From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: asutoshd@codeaurora.org, nguyenb@codeaurora.org,
hongwus@codeaurora.org, ziqichen@codeaurora.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/9] scsi: ufs: Simplify error handling preparation
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 13:58:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f6ea52f-308e-8252-5a19-3911eb9b99b1@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0ae504bccc428fa674a183608174bdd@codeaurora.org>
On 6/10/21 8:01 PM, Can Guo wrote:
> Previously, without commit cb7e6f05fce67c965194ac04467e1ba7bc70b069,
> ufshcd_resume() may turn off pwr and clk due to UFS error, e.g., link
> transition failure and SSU error/abort (and these UFS error would
> invoke error handling). When error handling kicks start, it should
> re-enable the pwr and clk before proceeding. Now, commit
> cb7e6f05fce67c965194ac04467e1ba7bc70b069 makes ufshcd_resume()
> purely control pwr and clk, meaning if ufshcd_resume() fails, there
> is nothing we can do about it - pwr or clk enabling must have failed,
> and it is not because of UFS error. This is why I am removing the
> re-enabling pwr/clk in error handling prepare.
Why are link transition failures handled in the error handler instead of
in the context where these errors are detected (ufshcd_resume())? Is it
even possible to recover from a link transition failure or does this
perhaps indicate a broken UFS controller?
>> but what I really wonder is why we don't just do recovery directly
>> in __ufshcd_wl_suspend() and __ufshcd_wl_resume() and strip all
>> the PM complexity out of ufshcd_err_handling()?
+1
> For system suspend/resume, since error handling has the same nature
> like user access, so we are using host_sem to avoid concurrency of
> error handling and system suspend/resume.
Why is host_sem used for that purpose instead of lock_system_sleep() and
unlock_system_sleep()?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-10 4:43 [PATCH v3 0/9] Complementary changes for error handling Can Guo
2021-06-10 4:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] scsi: ufs: Differentiate status between hba pm ops and wl pm ops Can Guo
2021-06-10 11:15 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-11 0:53 ` Can Guo
2021-06-11 20:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-12 6:20 ` Can Guo
2021-06-16 17:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 1:32 ` Can Guo
2021-06-10 4:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] scsi: ufs: Update the return value of supplier " Can Guo
2021-06-10 4:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] scsi: ufs: Enable IRQ after enabling clocks in error handling preparation Can Guo
2021-06-10 4:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] scsi: ufs: Complete the cmd before returning in queuecommand Can Guo
2021-06-11 20:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-12 7:38 ` Can Guo
2021-06-12 15:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-13 13:30 ` Can Guo
2021-06-10 4:43 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] scsi: ufs: Simplify error handling preparation Can Guo
2021-06-10 12:30 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-11 3:01 ` Can Guo
2021-06-11 20:58 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-06-12 6:46 ` Can Guo
2021-06-12 9:49 ` Can Guo
2021-06-10 4:43 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] scsi: ufs: Update ufshcd_recover_pm_error() Can Guo
2021-06-10 4:43 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] scsi: ufs: Let host_sem cover the entire system suspend/resume Can Guo
2021-06-10 13:32 ` Adrian Hunter
2021-06-11 3:06 ` Can Guo
2021-06-11 21:00 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-12 6:46 ` Can Guo
2021-06-10 4:43 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] scsi: ufs: Update the fast abort path in ufshcd_abort() for PM requests Can Guo
2021-06-11 21:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-12 7:07 ` Can Guo
2021-06-12 16:50 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-13 14:42 ` Can Guo
2021-06-14 18:49 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-15 2:36 ` Can Guo
2021-06-15 3:17 ` Can Guo
2021-06-15 18:25 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-16 4:00 ` Can Guo
2021-06-16 4:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-16 8:47 ` Can Guo
2021-06-16 17:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-23 1:34 ` Can Guo
2021-06-10 4:43 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] scsi: ufs: Apply more limitations to user access Can Guo
2021-06-11 21:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-06-12 7:13 ` Can Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4f6ea52f-308e-8252-5a19-3911eb9b99b1@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hongwus@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=nguyenb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=ziqichen@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.