KVM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	<kevin.tian@intel.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <seanjc@google.com>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <luto@kernel.org>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<bp@alien8.de>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
	<joro@8bytes.org>, <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] iommufd: Flush CPU caches on DMA pages in non-coherent domains
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 16:03:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zj3UuHQe4XgdDmDs@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240509141332.GP4650@nvidia.com>

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 11:13:32AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 02:22:12PM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c
> > index 33d142f8057d..e3099d732c5c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c
> > @@ -14,12 +14,18 @@ void iommufd_hwpt_paging_destroy(struct iommufd_object *obj)
> >  		container_of(obj, struct iommufd_hwpt_paging, common.obj);
> >  
> >  	if (!list_empty(&hwpt_paging->hwpt_item)) {
> > +		struct io_pagetable *iopt = &hwpt_paging->ioas->iopt;
> >  		mutex_lock(&hwpt_paging->ioas->mutex);
> >  		list_del(&hwpt_paging->hwpt_item);
> >  		mutex_unlock(&hwpt_paging->ioas->mutex);
> >  
> > -		iopt_table_remove_domain(&hwpt_paging->ioas->iopt,
> > -					 hwpt_paging->common.domain);
> > +		iopt_table_remove_domain(iopt, hwpt_paging->common.domain);
> > +
> > +		if (!hwpt_paging->enforce_cache_coherency) {
> > +			down_write(&iopt->domains_rwsem);
> > +			iopt->noncoherent_domain_cnt--;
> > +			up_write(&iopt->domains_rwsem);
> 
> I think it would be nicer to put this in iopt_table_remove_domain()
> since we already have the lock there anyhow. It would be OK to pass
> int he hwpt. Same remark for the incr side
Ok. Passed hwpt to the two funcions.

int iopt_table_add_domain(struct io_pagetable *iopt,
                          struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt);

void iopt_table_remove_domain(struct io_pagetable *iopt,
                              struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt);

> 
> > @@ -176,6 +182,12 @@ iommufd_hwpt_paging_alloc(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, struct iommufd_ioas *ioas,
> >  			goto out_abort;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	if (!hwpt_paging->enforce_cache_coherency) {
> > +		down_write(&ioas->iopt.domains_rwsem);
> > +		ioas->iopt.noncoherent_domain_cnt++;
> > +		up_write(&ioas->iopt.domains_rwsem);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	rc = iopt_table_add_domain(&ioas->iopt, hwpt->domain);
> 
> iopt_table_add_domain also already gets the required locks too
Right.

> 
> >  	if (rc)
> >  		goto out_detach;
> > @@ -183,6 +195,9 @@ iommufd_hwpt_paging_alloc(struct iommufd_ctx *ictx, struct iommufd_ioas *ioas,
> >  	return hwpt_paging;
> >  
> >  out_detach:
> > +	down_write(&ioas->iopt.domains_rwsem);
> > +	ioas->iopt.noncoherent_domain_cnt--;
> > +	up_write(&ioas->iopt.domains_rwsem);
> 
> And then you don't need this error unwind
Yes :)

> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/io_pagetable.h b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/io_pagetable.h
> > index 0ec3509b7e33..557da8fb83d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommufd/io_pagetable.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommufd/io_pagetable.h
> > @@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ struct iopt_pages {
> >  	void __user *uptr;
> >  	bool writable:1;
> >  	u8 account_mode;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * CPU cache flush is required before mapping the pages to or after
> > +	 * unmapping it from a noncoherent domain
> > +	 */
> > +	bool cache_flush_required:1;
> 
> Move this up a line so it packs with the other bool bitfield.
Yes, thanks!

> >  static void batch_clear(struct pfn_batch *batch)
> >  {
> >  	batch->total_pfns = 0;
> > @@ -637,10 +648,18 @@ static void batch_unpin(struct pfn_batch *batch, struct iopt_pages *pages,
> >  	while (npages) {
> >  		size_t to_unpin = min_t(size_t, npages,
> >  					batch->npfns[cur] - first_page_off);
> > +		unsigned long pfn = batch->pfns[cur] + first_page_off;
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Lazily flushing CPU caches when a page is about to be
> > +		 * unpinned if the page was mapped into a noncoherent domain
> > +		 */
> > +		if (pages->cache_flush_required)
> > +			arch_clean_nonsnoop_dma(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> > +						to_unpin << PAGE_SHIFT);
> >  
> >  		unpin_user_page_range_dirty_lock(
> > -			pfn_to_page(batch->pfns[cur] + first_page_off),
> > -			to_unpin, pages->writable);
> > +			pfn_to_page(pfn), to_unpin, pages->writable);
> >  		iopt_pages_sub_npinned(pages, to_unpin);
> >  		cur++;
> >  		first_page_off = 0;
> 
> Make sense
> 
> > @@ -1358,10 +1377,17 @@ int iopt_area_fill_domain(struct iopt_area *area, struct iommu_domain *domain)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long done_end_index;
> >  	struct pfn_reader pfns;
> > +	bool cache_flush_required;
> >  	int rc;
> >  
> >  	lockdep_assert_held(&area->pages->mutex);
> >  
> > +	cache_flush_required = area->iopt->noncoherent_domain_cnt &&
> > +			       !area->pages->cache_flush_required;
> > +
> > +	if (cache_flush_required)
> > +		area->pages->cache_flush_required = true;
> > +
> >  	rc = pfn_reader_first(&pfns, area->pages, iopt_area_index(area),
> >  			      iopt_area_last_index(area));
> >  	if (rc)
> > @@ -1369,6 +1395,9 @@ int iopt_area_fill_domain(struct iopt_area *area, struct iommu_domain *domain)
> >  
> >  	while (!pfn_reader_done(&pfns)) {
> >  		done_end_index = pfns.batch_start_index;
> > +		if (cache_flush_required)
> > +			iopt_cache_flush_pfn_batch(&pfns.batch);
> > +
> 
> This is a bit unfortunate, it means we are going to flush for every
> domain, even though it is not required. I don't see any easy way out
> of that :(
Yes. Do you think it's possible to add an op get_cache_coherency_enforced
to iommu_domain_ops?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-10  8:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07  6:18 [PATCH 0/5] Enforce CPU cache flush for non-coherent device assignment Yan Zhao
2024-05-07  6:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] x86/pat: Let pat_pfn_immune_to_uc_mtrr() check MTRR for untracked PAT range Yan Zhao
2024-05-07  8:26   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-07  9:12     ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-08 22:14       ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-09  3:36         ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-16  7:42       ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-16 14:07         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-20  2:36           ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-07  6:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: x86/mmu: Fine-grained check of whether a invalid & RAM PFN is MMIO Yan Zhao
2024-05-07  8:39   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-07  9:19     ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-07  6:20 ` [PATCH 3/5] x86/mm: Introduce and export interface arch_clean_nonsnoop_dma() Yan Zhao
2024-05-07  8:51   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-07  9:40     ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-20 14:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-21 15:49     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-21 16:00       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-22  3:41         ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-28  6:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-01 19:46           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-07  6:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] vfio/type1: Flush CPU caches on DMA pages in non-coherent domains Yan Zhao
2024-05-09 18:10   ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-10 10:31     ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-10 16:57       ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-13  7:11         ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-16  7:53           ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-16  8:34           ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-16 20:31             ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-17 17:11               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-20  2:52                 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-21 16:07                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-21 16:21                     ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-21 16:34                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-21 18:19                         ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-21 18:37                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-22  6:24                             ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-22 12:29                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-22 14:43                                 ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-22 16:52                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-22 18:22                                     ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-22 23:26                                 ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-22 23:32                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-22 23:40                                     ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-23 14:58                                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-23 22:47                                         ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-24  0:30                                           ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-24 13:50                                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-22  3:33                           ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-22  3:24                         ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-22 12:26                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-24  3:07                             ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-16 20:50           ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-17  3:11             ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-17  4:44               ` Alex Williamson
2024-05-17  5:00                 ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-07  6:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] iommufd: " Yan Zhao
2024-05-09 14:13   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-10  8:03     ` Yan Zhao [this message]
2024-05-10 13:29       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-13  7:43         ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-14 15:11           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-15  7:06             ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-15 20:43               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-16  2:32                 ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-16  8:38                   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-16  9:48                     ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-17 17:04                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-20  2:45                     ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-21 16:04                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-22  3:17                         ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-22  6:29                           ` Yan Zhao
2024-05-22 17:01                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-27  7:15                               ` Yan Zhao
2024-06-01 16:48                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zj3UuHQe4XgdDmDs@yzhao56-desk.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).