Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
	 Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,  Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	 Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] for-each-repo: optionally keep going on an error
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:02:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqfrvazobm.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39ee6386aab25f28d197a27010b2f80ccd45aab2.1713975300.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:14:58 +0000")

"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

> @@ -55,8 +58,14 @@ int cmd_for_each_repo(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  	else if (err)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; !result && i < values->nr; i++)
> -		result = run_command_on_repo(values->items[i].string, argc, argv);
> +	for (i = 0; i < values->nr; i++) {
> +		int ret = run_command_on_repo(values->items[i].string, argc, argv);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			if (!keep_going)
> +					return ret;
> +			result = 1;
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	return result;
>  }

Hmph, as I wish that more experienced folks to give a good structure
to the codebase from get-go so that future developers who may be
less experienced would avoid mistakes, with my maintainer's hat on,
I would have expected something more like:

	for (i = 0; i < values->nr; i++) {
		int ret = run_command_on_repo(...);
		if (!ret)
			continue;
		if (keep_going) {
                	result = 1;			
		} else {
                	result = ret;
                        break;
		}
	}

That way, clean-up actions, when they need to be added, can go
before the single "return result" without structural changes,
future-proofing the shape of the control flow.

The loop is simple enough that it is acceptable to leave as the
responsibility of future developers who wants to do something that
require resource allocation and release before returning, of course
;-).




  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17  8:28 [PATCH 0/2] Use a "best effort" strategy in scheduled maintenance Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-04-17  8:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] for-each-repo: optionally keep going on an error Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-04-17  8:36   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-17 15:38     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-17  8:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] maintenance: running maintenance should not stop on errors Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-04-17 15:41   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-17 15:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] Use a "best effort" strategy in scheduled maintenance Junio C Hamano
2024-04-18 12:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-04-18 12:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] for-each-repo: optionally keep going on an error Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-04-19  4:24     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-04-19 16:03       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-19 17:56         ` Jeff King
2024-04-22 21:39           ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-18 12:53   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] maintenance: running maintenance should not stop on errors Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-04-24 16:14   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Use a "best effort" strategy in scheduled maintenance Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-04-24 16:14     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] for-each-repo: optionally keep going on an error Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-04-24 17:02       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-04-24 16:14     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] maintenance: running maintenance should not stop on errors Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2024-04-25  6:36     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Use a "best effort" strategy in scheduled maintenance Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqfrvazobm.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).