Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@univ-lyon1.fr>
Subject: Re: Can we clarify the purpose of `git diff -s`?
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 12:17:06 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <645d3122bd1d2_26011a2947a@chronos.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqwn1ewyzx.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > I entirely agree with your conclusion: obviously, -s (--silent) and
> > --no-patch are to be different for UI to be even remotely intuitive, and
> > I'd vote for immediate fix of --no-patch semantics even though it's a
> > backward-incompatible change.

> While it is very clear that the intent of the author was to make it
> a synonym for "-s" and not a "feature-wise enable/disable" option,

I disgree, it's very clear the intention was to negate --patch, he
explicitely said so multiple times:

 * This follows the usual convention of having a --no-foo option to
   negate --foo.
 * to cancel the effect of `--patch`.

In particular, the purpose was to make silencing the output of `git diff`
more accessible, the cover letter makes it abundantly clear [1]:

====
  > Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@googlemail.com> writes:
  >
  >> However I sometimes also get:
  >> sb@sb:~/OSS/git$ git show --format="%ad" 0da7a53
  >> Fri Jul 12 10:49:34 2013 -0700
  >>
  >> diff --git a/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.4.txt
  >> b/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.4.txt
  >> index 0e50df8..4250e5a 100644
  >> --- a/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.4.txt
  >> +++ b/Documentation/RelNotes/1.8.4.txt
  >
  > "git show" will show the diff by default. For merge commits, it shows
  > the --cc diff which is often empty, hence the behavior you see.
  >
  > You want to use "git show -s", which suppresses the patch output.

  ... and this "git show -s" is extraordinarily hard to discover, as it
  is only documented in "git log --help". Google has been my friend
  here, but we should really improve that.

  This patch series does essentially two things:

  * Add a --no-patch synonym for -s. I'm actually wondering why the
    option wasn't called this way from the beginning.

  * Reorganize the doc so that "git show" actually mentions it.
====

Making it a synonym of `-s` was a means, not an end.

> I do not think it will break established use cases too badly to fix
> the behaviour of "-s" so that it does not get stuck.  We saw an
> existing breakage in one test,

It's curious that your patch breaks one test case, while my approach
breaks *zero* cases.

> but asking the owners of scripts that make the same mistake of
> assuming "-s" gets stuck for some but not other options to fix that
> assumption based on an earlier faulty implementation is much easier.

"The users are using the interface wrong" is an euphemism for "I want to
break backwards-compatibility".

According to Linus Torvalds if your users are relying on a bug in your
interface, that bug is now a feature.

If we want to break backwards-compatibility then let's do so.

> So, no, I do not think we can immediately "fix".  I do not think
> anybody knows if it can be done "immediately" or needs a careful
> planning to transition, and I offhand do not know if it is even
> possible to transition without fallout.

I know it can be done immediately, because my patch series already did
it.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/1373893639-13413-1-git-send-email-Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr/

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-05-11 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-11  3:14 Can we clarify the purpose of `git diff -s`? Felipe Contreras
2023-05-11 11:59 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-11 16:26   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-11 17:37   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-11 18:04     ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-11 18:27       ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-11 18:36       ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-11 18:17     ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2023-05-11 17:41   ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-11 18:31     ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-11 19:10       ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-11 19:32         ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-11 19:54           ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-11 20:24             ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-11 20:59               ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-11 22:49                 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-11 23:28                   ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-12  8:40                     ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-12 19:19                       ` Felipe Contreras
     [not found]   ` <5bb24e0208dd4a8ca5f6697d578f3ae0@SAMBXP02.univ-lyon1.fr>
2023-05-12  8:15     ` Matthieu Moy
2023-05-12 17:03       ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-12 18:21         ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-12 19:21           ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-12 19:34             ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-12 20:28             ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-12 20:47               ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-12 21:01                 ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-12 21:47                   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-12 21:48                     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-12 23:21                     ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-12 21:41                 ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-12 22:17                   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-05-12 22:47                     ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-12 23:07                   ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-13 14:58                     ` Philip Oakley
2023-05-13 17:45                       ` Sergey Organov
2023-05-12 19:47           ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-12 19:34         ` Felipe Contreras
2023-05-12 19:17       ` Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=645d3122bd1d2_26011a2947a@chronos.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=matthieu.moy@univ-lyon1.fr \
    --cc=sorganov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).