From: "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference at ttm_device_init+0xb4
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:40:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <713eaa19-33b9-40fe-a3a5-69e45d671399@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122193453.6096d45f@gandalf.local.home>
On 1/22/2024 7:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:29:41 -0500
> "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> In one of my previous revisions of this patch when I was experimenting,
>> I used something like below. Wonder if that could work in your case
>> and/or in general.
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>>
>> index 43e27ab77f95..4c3902b94be4 100644
>>
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>>
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>>
>> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ int ttm_device_init(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct
>> ttm_device_funcs *funcs,
>>
>> bool use_dma_alloc, bool use_dma32){
>>
>> struct ttm_global *glob = &ttm_glob;
>>
>> +bool node_has_cpu = false;
>>
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (WARN_ON(vma_manager == NULL))
>>
>> @@ -213,7 +214,12 @@ int ttm_device_init(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct
>> ttm_device_funcs *funcs,
>>
>> bdev->funcs = funcs;
>>
>> ttm_sys_man_init(bdev);
>>
>> -ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, NUMA_NO_NODE, use_dma_alloc, use_dma32);
>>
>> +
>>
>> +node_has_cpu = node_state(dev->numa_node, N_CPU);
> Considering that qxl_ttm_init() passes in dev = NULL, the above would blow
> up just the same.
I agree, I think we need something like you suggested i.e.
+ ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, dev ? dev_to_node(dev) : NUMA_NO_NODE,
+ use_dma_alloc, use_dma32);
I am not quite sure if the above node_has_cpu change will be a better
solution in general, along with the NULL pointer check as you suggested.
If you prefer that, then I can send a fix otherwise, your fix looks good
to me.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>> +if (node_has_cpu)
>>
>> +ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, dev->numa_node, use_dma_alloc, use_dma32);
>>
>> +else
>>
>> +ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, NUMA_NO_NODE, use_dma_alloc,
>>
>> +use_dma32);
>>
>> bdev->vma_manager = vma_manager;
>>
>> spin_lock_init(&bdev->lru_lock);
>>
>>
>>> -- Steve
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: "Felix Kuehling" <Felix.Kuehling@amd.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference at ttm_device_init+0xb4
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:40:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <713eaa19-33b9-40fe-a3a5-69e45d671399@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122193453.6096d45f@gandalf.local.home>
On 1/22/2024 7:34 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:29:41 -0500
> "Bhardwaj, Rajneesh" <rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> In one of my previous revisions of this patch when I was experimenting,
>> I used something like below. Wonder if that could work in your case
>> and/or in general.
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>>
>> index 43e27ab77f95..4c3902b94be4 100644
>>
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>>
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
>>
>> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ int ttm_device_init(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct
>> ttm_device_funcs *funcs,
>>
>> bool use_dma_alloc, bool use_dma32){
>>
>> struct ttm_global *glob = &ttm_glob;
>>
>> +bool node_has_cpu = false;
>>
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (WARN_ON(vma_manager == NULL))
>>
>> @@ -213,7 +214,12 @@ int ttm_device_init(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct
>> ttm_device_funcs *funcs,
>>
>> bdev->funcs = funcs;
>>
>> ttm_sys_man_init(bdev);
>>
>> -ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, NUMA_NO_NODE, use_dma_alloc, use_dma32);
>>
>> +
>>
>> +node_has_cpu = node_state(dev->numa_node, N_CPU);
> Considering that qxl_ttm_init() passes in dev = NULL, the above would blow
> up just the same.
I agree, I think we need something like you suggested i.e.
+ ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, dev ? dev_to_node(dev) : NUMA_NO_NODE,
+ use_dma_alloc, use_dma32);
I am not quite sure if the above node_has_cpu change will be a better
solution in general, along with the NULL pointer check as you suggested.
If you prefer that, then I can send a fix otherwise, your fix looks good
to me.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>> +if (node_has_cpu)
>>
>> +ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, dev->numa_node, use_dma_alloc, use_dma32);
>>
>> +else
>>
>> +ttm_pool_init(&bdev->pool, dev, NUMA_NO_NODE, use_dma_alloc,
>>
>> +use_dma32);
>>
>> bdev->vma_manager = vma_manager;
>>
>> spin_lock_init(&bdev->lru_lock);
>>
>>
>>> -- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-23 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 23:06 [BUG] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference at ttm_device_init+0xb4 Steven Rostedt
2024-01-22 23:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-22 23:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-22 23:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-22 23:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-22 23:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-23 0:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-23 0:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-23 0:56 ` Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
2024-01-23 1:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-23 1:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-23 1:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-23 1:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-23 2:21 ` Dave Airlie
2024-01-23 2:21 ` Dave Airlie
2024-01-23 2:32 ` Dave Airlie
2024-01-23 2:32 ` Dave Airlie
2024-01-23 2:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-23 2:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-23 9:43 ` Christian König
2024-01-23 9:43 ` Christian König
2024-01-23 14:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-23 14:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-23 1:06 ` Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
2024-01-23 1:06 ` Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
2024-01-23 0:29 ` Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
2024-01-23 0:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-23 0:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-23 0:40 ` Bhardwaj, Rajneesh [this message]
2024-01-23 0:40 ` Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=713eaa19-33b9-40fe-a3a5-69e45d671399@amd.com \
--to=rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com \
--cc=Felix.Kuehling@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.