All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Edgar Bernardi Righi" <edgar.righi@lsitec.org.br>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] clk: actions: Fix AHPPREDIV-H-AHB clock chain on Owl S500 SoC
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:10:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210610201025.GA1497285@BV030612LT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210610143413.GC315240@thinkpad>

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 08:04:13PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 04:16:42PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > There are a few issues with the setup of the Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC's
> > clock chain involving AHPPREDIV, H and AHB clocks:
> > 
> > * AHBPREDIV clock is defined as a muxer only, although it also acts as
> >   a divider.
> > * H clock is using a wrong divider register offset
> > * AHB is defined as a multi-rate factor clock, but it is actually just
> >   a fixed pass clock.
> > 
> > Let's provide the following fixes:
> > 
> > * Change AHBPREDIV clock to an ungated OWL_COMP_DIV definition.
> > * Use the correct register shift value in the OWL_DIVIDER definition
> >   for H clock
> > * Drop the unneeded 'ahb_factor_table[]' and change AHB clock to an
> >   ungated OWL_COMP_FIXED_FACTOR definition.

[...]

> >  /* composite clocks */
> > +static OWL_COMP_DIV(ahbprediv_clk, "ahbprediv_clk", ahbprediv_clk_mux_p,
> > +			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_BUSCLK1, 8, 3),
> > +			{ 0 },
> > +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_BUSCLK1, 12, 2, 0, NULL),
> > +			0);
> > +
> > +static OWL_COMP_FIXED_FACTOR(ahb_clk, "ahb_clk", "h_clk",
> > +			{ 0 },
> > +			1, 1, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> 
> I think you swapped the flags between "ahbprediv_clk" and "ahb_clk"...

Thanks for noticing this, I fixed it in v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1623354574.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com/

> > +
> >  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(vce_clk, "vce_clk", hde_clk_mux_p,
> >  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 4, 2),
> >  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 26, 0),
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: "Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Edgar Bernardi Righi" <edgar.righi@lsitec.org.br>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-actions@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] clk: actions: Fix AHPPREDIV-H-AHB clock chain on Owl S500 SoC
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 23:10:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210610201025.GA1497285@BV030612LT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210610143413.GC315240@thinkpad>

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 08:04:13PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 04:16:42PM +0300, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> > There are a few issues with the setup of the Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC's
> > clock chain involving AHPPREDIV, H and AHB clocks:
> > 
> > * AHBPREDIV clock is defined as a muxer only, although it also acts as
> >   a divider.
> > * H clock is using a wrong divider register offset
> > * AHB is defined as a multi-rate factor clock, but it is actually just
> >   a fixed pass clock.
> > 
> > Let's provide the following fixes:
> > 
> > * Change AHBPREDIV clock to an ungated OWL_COMP_DIV definition.
> > * Use the correct register shift value in the OWL_DIVIDER definition
> >   for H clock
> > * Drop the unneeded 'ahb_factor_table[]' and change AHB clock to an
> >   ungated OWL_COMP_FIXED_FACTOR definition.

[...]

> >  /* composite clocks */
> > +static OWL_COMP_DIV(ahbprediv_clk, "ahbprediv_clk", ahbprediv_clk_mux_p,
> > +			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_BUSCLK1, 8, 3),
> > +			{ 0 },
> > +			OWL_DIVIDER_HW(CMU_BUSCLK1, 12, 2, 0, NULL),
> > +			0);
> > +
> > +static OWL_COMP_FIXED_FACTOR(ahb_clk, "ahb_clk", "h_clk",
> > +			{ 0 },
> > +			1, 1, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT);
> 
> I think you swapped the flags between "ahbprediv_clk" and "ahb_clk"...

Thanks for noticing this, I fixed it in v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1623354574.git.cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com/

> > +
> >  static OWL_COMP_FACTOR(vce_clk, "vce_clk", hde_clk_mux_p,
> >  			OWL_MUX_HW(CMU_VCECLK, 4, 2),
> >  			OWL_GATE_HW(CMU_DEVCLKEN0, 26, 0),
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-10 20:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-27 13:16 [PATCH v2 0/6] Improve clock support for Actions S500 SoC Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] clk: actions: Fix UART clock dividers on Owl " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] clk: actions: Fix SD clocks factor table " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-06-10 14:29   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-10 14:29     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-27 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] clk: actions: Fix bisp_factor_table based clocks " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-06-10 14:32   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-10 14:32     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-27 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] clk: actions: Fix AHPPREDIV-H-AHB clock chain " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-06-10 14:34   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-10 14:34     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-10 20:10     ` Cristian Ciocaltea [this message]
2021-06-10 20:10       ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] dt-bindings: clock: Add NIC and ETHERNET bindings for Actions " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-06-10 14:34   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-10 14:34     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-05-27 13:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] clk: actions: Add NIC and ETHERNET clock support " Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-05-27 13:16   ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2021-06-10 14:35   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-06-10 14:35     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210610201025.GA1497285@BV030612LT \
    --to=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edgar.righi@lsitec.org.br \
    --cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.