All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] dma-fence, i915: Stop allowing SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for dma_fence
Date: Wed,  9 Jun 2021 16:29:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210609212959.471209-1-jason@jlekstrand.net> (raw)

Ever since 0eafec6d3244 ("drm/i915: Enable lockless lookup of request
tracking via RCU"), the i915 driver has used SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU (it
was called SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU at the time) in order to allow RCU on
i915_request.  As nifty as SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU may be, it comes with
some serious disclaimers.  In particular, objects can get recycled while
RCU readers are still in-flight.  This can be ok if everyone who touches
these objects knows about the disclaimers and is careful.  However,
because we've chosen to use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for i915_request and
because i915_request contains a dma_fence, we've leaked
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU and its whole pile of disclaimers to every driver
in the kernel which may consume a dma_fence.

We've tried to keep it somewhat contained by doing most of the hard work
to prevent access of recycled objects via dma_fence_get_rcu_safe().
However, a quick grep of kernel sources says that, of the 30 instances
of dma_fence_get_rcu*, only 11 of them use dma_fence_get_rcu_safe().
It's likely there bear traps in DRM and related subsystems just waiting
for someone to accidentally step in them.

This patch series stops us using SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for i915_request
and, instead, does an RCU-safe slab free via rcu_call().  This should
let us keep most of the perf benefits of slab allocation while avoiding
the bear traps inherent in SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU.  It then removes support
for SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU from dma_fence entirely.

Note: The last patch is labled DONOTMERGE.  This was at Daniel Vetter's
request as we may want to let this bake for a couple releases before we
rip out dma_fence_get_rcu_safe entirely.

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Jason Ekstrand (5):
  drm/i915: Move intel_engine_free_request_pool to i915_request.c
  drm/i915: Use a simpler scheme for caching i915_request
  drm/i915: Stop using SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for i915_request
  dma-buf: Stop using SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU in selftests
  DONOTMERGE: dma-buf: Get rid of dma_fence_get_rcu_safe

 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c         |   8 +-
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c                |   4 +-
 drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c      |  24 +---
 drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c            |  27 +---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c |   8 --
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h        |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c       | 147 ++++++++++++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h       |   2 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c           |   4 +-
 include/drm/drm_syncobj.h                 |   4 +-
 include/linux/dma-fence.h                 |  50 --------
 include/linux/dma-resv.h                  |   4 +-
 13 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 180 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Jon Bloomfield" <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>,
	"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>,
	"Jason Ekstrand" <jason@jlekstrand.net>,
	"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] dma-fence, i915: Stop allowing SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for dma_fence
Date: Wed,  9 Jun 2021 16:29:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210609212959.471209-1-jason@jlekstrand.net> (raw)

Ever since 0eafec6d3244 ("drm/i915: Enable lockless lookup of request
tracking via RCU"), the i915 driver has used SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU (it
was called SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU at the time) in order to allow RCU on
i915_request.  As nifty as SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU may be, it comes with
some serious disclaimers.  In particular, objects can get recycled while
RCU readers are still in-flight.  This can be ok if everyone who touches
these objects knows about the disclaimers and is careful.  However,
because we've chosen to use SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for i915_request and
because i915_request contains a dma_fence, we've leaked
SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU and its whole pile of disclaimers to every driver
in the kernel which may consume a dma_fence.

We've tried to keep it somewhat contained by doing most of the hard work
to prevent access of recycled objects via dma_fence_get_rcu_safe().
However, a quick grep of kernel sources says that, of the 30 instances
of dma_fence_get_rcu*, only 11 of them use dma_fence_get_rcu_safe().
It's likely there bear traps in DRM and related subsystems just waiting
for someone to accidentally step in them.

This patch series stops us using SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for i915_request
and, instead, does an RCU-safe slab free via rcu_call().  This should
let us keep most of the perf benefits of slab allocation while avoiding
the bear traps inherent in SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU.  It then removes support
for SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU from dma_fence entirely.

Note: The last patch is labled DONOTMERGE.  This was at Daniel Vetter's
request as we may want to let this bake for a couple releases before we
rip out dma_fence_get_rcu_safe entirely.

Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand <jason@jlekstrand.net>
Cc: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>

Jason Ekstrand (5):
  drm/i915: Move intel_engine_free_request_pool to i915_request.c
  drm/i915: Use a simpler scheme for caching i915_request
  drm/i915: Stop using SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for i915_request
  dma-buf: Stop using SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU in selftests
  DONOTMERGE: dma-buf: Get rid of dma_fence_get_rcu_safe

 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence-chain.c         |   8 +-
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-resv.c                |   4 +-
 drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence-chain.c      |  24 +---
 drivers/dma-buf/st-dma-fence.c            |  27 +---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c |   8 --
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.h        |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c       | 147 ++++++++++++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.h       |   2 -
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c           |   4 +-
 include/drm/drm_syncobj.h                 |   4 +-
 include/linux/dma-fence.h                 |  50 --------
 include/linux/dma-resv.h                  |   4 +-
 13 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 180 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-09 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-09 21:29 Jason Ekstrand [this message]
2021-06-09 21:29 ` [PATCH 0/5] dma-fence, i915: Stop allowing SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for dma_fence Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-09 21:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915: Move intel_engine_free_request_pool to i915_request.c Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-09 21:29   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 10:03   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10 10:03     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10 13:57     ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 13:57       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 15:07       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10 15:07         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10 16:32         ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 16:32           ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-09 21:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Use a simpler scheme for caching i915_request Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-09 21:29   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 10:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10 10:08     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10 13:50     ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 13:50       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-09 21:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915: Stop using SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for i915_request Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-09 21:29   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-09 21:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] dma-buf: Stop using SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU in selftests Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-09 21:29   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-16 12:47   ` [Intel-gfx] " kernel test robot
2021-06-16 12:47     ` kernel test robot
2021-06-16 12:47     ` kernel test robot
2021-06-09 21:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/5] DONOTMERGE: dma-buf: Get rid of dma_fence_get_rcu_safe Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-09 21:29   ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10  6:51   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-06-10  6:51     ` Christian König
2021-06-10 13:59     ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 13:59       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 15:13       ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 15:13         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 16:24         ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 16:24           ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 16:37           ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 16:37             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 16:52             ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 16:52               ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 17:06               ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 17:06                 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 16:54             ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-06-10 16:54               ` Christian König
2021-06-10 17:11               ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 17:11                 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 18:12                 ` Christian König
2021-06-10 18:12                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Christian König
2021-06-16 16:38   ` kernel test robot
2021-06-16 16:38     ` kernel test robot
2021-06-16 16:38     ` kernel test robot
2021-06-09 21:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for dma-fence, i915: Stop allowing SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU for dma_fence Patchwork
2021-06-09 21:54 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-06-09 22:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2021-06-09 22:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: warning " Patchwork
2021-06-10  9:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/5] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10  9:29   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10  9:39   ` Christian König
2021-06-10  9:39     ` Christian König
2021-06-10 11:29     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 11:29       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 11:53       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 11:53         ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 13:07       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10 13:07         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2021-06-10 13:35       ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 13:35         ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 20:09         ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 20:09           ` Jason Ekstrand
2021-06-10 20:42           ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-10 20:42             ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-11  6:55             ` Christian König
2021-06-11  6:55               ` Christian König
2021-06-11  7:20               ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-11  7:20                 ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-11  7:42                 ` Christian König
2021-06-11  7:42                   ` Christian König
2021-06-11  9:33                   ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-11  9:33                     ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-11 10:03                     ` Christian König
2021-06-11 10:03                       ` Christian König
2021-06-11 15:08                       ` Daniel Vetter
2021-06-11 15:08                         ` Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210609212959.471209-1-jason@jlekstrand.net \
    --to=jason@jlekstrand.net \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.