diff options
author | Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> | 2023-04-22 10:33:42 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> | 2023-04-22 19:33:08 +0000 |
commit | 10f31b26e010243ab919dbafeb6f95c6e30640e9 (patch) | |
tree | fa793044a409f009c69d741bf34fb4ea42f9178a /script | |
parent | c23413abbe1db6e96af4a028f69613d1340e880c (diff) | |
download | public-inbox-10f31b26e010243ab919dbafeb6f95c6e30640e9.tar.gz |
With my partial git.kernel.org mirror, this brings a full prune down from ~75 minutes to under 5 minutes using git 2.19+. This speedup even applies to users on slow storage (rotational HDD). First off, xapian-delve(1) is nearly 10x faster for dumping boolean terms by prefix than the equivalent Perl code with Xapian bindings. This performance difference is critical since we need to check over 5 million commits for pruning a partial git.kernel.org mirror. We can use sed(1) and sort(1) to massage delve output into something suitable for the first comm(1) input. For the second comm(1) input, the output of `git cat-file --batch-check --batch-all-objects' against all indexed git repos with awk(1) filtering provides the necessary output for generating a list of indexed-but-no-longer accessible commits. sed(1) and awk(1) are POSIX standard tools which can be roughly 2x faster than equivalent Perl for simple filters, while sort(1) is designed to handle larger-than-memory datasets efficiently (unlike the `sort' perlop). With slow storage and git <2.19, the switch to --batch-all-objects actually results in a performance regression since having git perform sorting results in worse disk locality than the previous sequential iteration by Xapian docid. git 2.19+ users with `--unordered' support benefits from improved storage locality; and speedups from storage locality dwarfs the extra overhead of an extra external sort(1) invocation. Even with consumer-grade SATA-II SSDs, the combo of --unordered and sort(1) provides a noticeable speedup since SSD latency remains a factor for --batch-all-objects. git <2.19 users must upgrade git to get acceptable performance on slow storage and giant indexes, but git 2.19 was released nearly 5 years ago so it's probably a reasonable requirement for performance. The only remaining downside of this change for all users the extra temporary disk space for sort(1) and comm(1); but the speedup provided with git 2.19+ is well worth it.
Diffstat (limited to 'script')
-rwxr-xr-x | script/public-inbox-cindex | 1 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/script/public-inbox-cindex b/script/public-inbox-cindex index 4c9136cf..2f7796e7 100755 --- a/script/public-inbox-cindex +++ b/script/public-inbox-cindex @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ GetOptions($opt, qw(quiet|q verbose|v+ reindex jobs|j=i fsync|sync! dangerous indexlevel|index-level|L=s batch_size|batch-size=s max_size|max-size=s project-list=s exclude=s@ + sort-parallel=s sort-compress-program=s sort-buffer-size=s d=s update|u scan! prune dry-run|n C=s@ help|h)) or die $help; if ($opt->{help}) { print $help; exit 0 }; |