From: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
"Karel Balej" <balejk@matfyz.cz>
Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: Fix setting period with #pwm-cells = <1> and of_pwm_single_xlate()
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:09:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e7ef1d2-ecc5-49c9-96e7-e479f0e5e3d8@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <v5jwouykt37up3bcjiigjgipzfdwgo5cguskunxjmyags43gql@dmrcrynj4zvj>
On 29.03.24 14:24, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:21:15PM +0100, Karel Balej wrote:
>> Just a nit: I am not sure if perhaps this being part of the report
>> thread is sufficient, but generally there should probably also be a
>> Closes: trailer for regzbot to automatically mark the report as resolved
>> among other reasons.
>
> I applied this patch and added
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/D05IVTPYH35N.2CLDG6LSILRSN@matfyz.cz
>
> to the Signoff area which should be good enough to make the regzbot
> recognize this as the matching fix.
Thx for that. FWIW, those tags are not only for regzbot: they are older,
as Linus wants them for good reasons[1]; that's why the docs also tell
people to place them[2] for many years now. But a lot of developer are
either not aware or ignore that.
Ciao, Thorsten
[1] for details, see:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjMmSZzMJ3Xnskdg4+GGz=5p5p+GSYyFBTh0f-DgvdBWg@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgs38ZrfPvy=nOwVkVzjpM3VFU1zobP37Fwd_h9iAD5JQ@mail.gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjxzafG-=J8oT30s7upn4RhBs6TX-uVFZ5rME+L5_DoJA@mail.gmail.com/
[2] see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
(http://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html) and
Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst
(https://docs.kernel.org/process/5.Posting.html)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-29 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 16:27 [REGRESSION] PWM vibrator does not probe with v6.9-rc1 Karel Balej
2024-03-29 10:35 ` [PATCH] pwm: Fix setting period with #pwm-cells = <1> and of_pwm_single_xlate() Uwe Kleine-König
2024-03-29 11:21 ` Karel Balej
2024-03-29 13:24 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-03-29 14:09 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e7ef1d2-ecc5-49c9-96e7-e479f0e5e3d8@leemhuis.info \
--to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=balejk@matfyz.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).