QEMU-Devel Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jamin Lin <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>
To: "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Andrew Jeffery" <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>,
	"Joel Stanley" <joel@jms.id.au>,
	"Alistair Francis" <alistair@alistair23.me>,
	"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
	"Beraldo Leal" <bleal@redhat.com>,
	"open list:ASPEED BMCs" <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	"open list:All patches CC here" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Troy Lee <troy_lee@aspeedtech.com>,
	Yunlin Tang <yunlin.tang@aspeedtech.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 08/16] aspeed/smc: support 64 bits dma dram address
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:00:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SEYPR06MB50377414AEA2C2CAEF28A5E8FC0D2@SEYPR06MB5037.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b6d5078-121d-4370-86fc-4bb25ad4e72f@kaod.org>

Hi Cedric,
> 
> Hello Jamin,
> 
> On 4/16/24 11:18, Jamin Lin wrote:
> > AST2700 support the maximum dram size is 8GiB and has a "DMA DRAM
> Side
> > Address High Part(0x7C)"
> > register to support 64 bits dma dram address.
> > Add helper routines functions to compute the dma dram address, new
> > features and update trace-event to support 64 bits dram address.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Troy Lee <troy_lee@aspeedtech.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jamin Lin <jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com>
> > ---
> >   hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c | 66
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >   hw/ssi/trace-events |  2 +-
> >   2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c b/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c index
> > 71abc7a2d8..a67cac3d0f 100644
> > --- a/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c
> > +++ b/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c
> > @@ -132,6 +132,9 @@
> >   #define   FMC_WDT2_CTRL_BOOT_SOURCE      BIT(4) /* O: primary
> 1: alternate */
> >   #define   FMC_WDT2_CTRL_EN               BIT(0)
> >
> > +/* DMA DRAM Side Address High Part (AST2700) */
> > +#define R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH   (0x7c / 4)
> > +
> >   /* DMA Control/Status Register */
> >   #define R_DMA_CTRL        (0x80 / 4)
> >   #define   DMA_CTRL_REQUEST      (1 << 31)
> > @@ -187,6 +190,7 @@
> >    *   0x1FFFFFF: 32M bytes
> >    */
> >   #define DMA_DRAM_ADDR(asc, val)   ((val) & (asc)->dma_dram_mask)
> > +#define DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH(val)   ((val) & 0xf)
> >   #define DMA_FLASH_ADDR(asc, val)  ((val) & (asc)->dma_flash_mask)
> >   #define DMA_LENGTH(val)         ((val) & 0x01FFFFFF)
> >
> > @@ -207,6 +211,7 @@ static const AspeedSegments
> aspeed_2500_spi2_segments[];
> >   #define ASPEED_SMC_FEATURE_DMA       0x1
> >   #define ASPEED_SMC_FEATURE_DMA_GRANT 0x2
> >   #define ASPEED_SMC_FEATURE_WDT_CONTROL 0x4
> > +#define ASPEED_SMC_FEATURE_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH 0x08
> >
> >   static inline bool aspeed_smc_has_dma(const AspeedSMCClass *asc)
> >   {
> > @@ -218,6 +223,11 @@ static inline bool
> aspeed_smc_has_wdt_control(const AspeedSMCClass *asc)
> >       return !!(asc->features & ASPEED_SMC_FEATURE_WDT_CONTROL);
> >   }
> >
> > +static inline bool aspeed_smc_has_dma_dram_addr_high(const
> > +AspeedSMCClass *asc)
> 
> To ease the reading, I would call the helper aspeed_smc_has_dma64()
Will fix it
> 
> > +{
> > +    return !!(asc->features &
> ASPEED_SMC_FEATURE_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH);
> > +}
> > +
> >   #define aspeed_smc_error(fmt, ...)
> \
> >       qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "%s: " fmt "\n", __func__, ##
> > __VA_ARGS__)
> >
> > @@ -747,6 +757,9 @@ static uint64_t aspeed_smc_read(void *opaque,
> hwaddr addr, unsigned int size)
> >           (aspeed_smc_has_dma(asc) && addr == R_DMA_CTRL) ||
> >           (aspeed_smc_has_dma(asc) && addr == R_DMA_FLASH_ADDR)
> ||
> >           (aspeed_smc_has_dma(asc) && addr == R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR)
> ||
> > +        (aspeed_smc_has_dma(asc) &&
> > +         aspeed_smc_has_dma_dram_addr_high(asc) &&
> > +         addr == R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH) ||
> >           (aspeed_smc_has_dma(asc) && addr == R_DMA_LEN) ||
> >           (aspeed_smc_has_dma(asc) && addr == R_DMA_CHECKSUM)
> ||
> >           (addr >= R_SEG_ADDR0 &&
> > @@ -847,6 +860,23 @@ static bool
> aspeed_smc_inject_read_failure(AspeedSMCState *s)
> >       }
> >   }
> >
> > +static uint64_t aspeed_smc_dma_dram_addr(AspeedSMCState *s) {
> > +    AspeedSMCClass *asc = ASPEED_SMC_GET_CLASS(s);
> > +    uint64_t dram_addr_high;
> > +    uint64_t dma_dram_addr;
> > +
> > +    if (aspeed_smc_has_dma_dram_addr_high(asc)) {
> > +        dram_addr_high = s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH];
> > +        dram_addr_high <<= 32;
> > +        dma_dram_addr = dram_addr_high |
> s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR];
> 
> Here is a proposal to shorten the routine :
> 
>          return ((uint64_t) s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH] << 32) |
>              s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR];
> 
> 
> > +    } else {
> > +        dma_dram_addr = s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR];
> 
> and
>          return s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR];
> 
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return dma_dram_addr;
> > +}
> > +
Thanks for your suggestion. Will fix.
> >   static uint32_t aspeed_smc_dma_len(AspeedSMCState *s)
> >   {
> >       AspeedSMCClass *asc = ASPEED_SMC_GET_CLASS(s); @@ -914,24
> > +944,34 @@ static void aspeed_smc_dma_checksum(AspeedSMCState *s)
> >
> >   static void aspeed_smc_dma_rw(AspeedSMCState *s)
> >   {
> > +    AspeedSMCClass *asc = ASPEED_SMC_GET_CLASS(s);
> > +    uint64_t dram_addr_high;
> 
> This variable doesn't look very useful
Will try to remove it.
> 
> > +    uint64_t dma_dram_addr;
> > +    uint64_t dram_addr;
> 
> and dram_addr is redundant with dma_dram_addr. Please use only one.
Please see my below description and please give us any suggestion.
> 
> 
> >       MemTxResult result;
> >       uint32_t dma_len;
> >       uint32_t data;
> >
> >       dma_len = aspeed_smc_dma_len(s);
> > +    dma_dram_addr = aspeed_smc_dma_dram_addr(s);
> > +
> > +    if (aspeed_smc_has_dma_dram_addr_high(asc)) {
> > +        dram_addr = dma_dram_addr - s->dram_mr->container->addr;
> 
> Why do you truncate the address again ? It should already be done with
> 
> #define DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH(val)   ((val) & 0xf)
> 
The reason is that our firmware set the real address in SMC registers.
For example: If users want to move data from flash to the DRAM at address 0,
It set R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH 4 and R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR 0 because the
dram base address is 0x 4 00000000 for AST2700.

According to the design of QEMU, the dram container base address is 0x4 00000000(s->dram_mr).
Therefore, in the above example, the data should be moved to the dram container at address 0.

I created two variables to save the different base address.
A dma_dram_addr is used to save the real address.
A dram_addr is used to save the address for dram container(s->dram_as)

Example:
dma_dram_addr is 0x4 00000000  
(uint64) s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH] << 32) |s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR]
dram_addr is 0
dram_addr = 0x400000000(real address) - 0x400000000(dram container base address) to get the address for dram contained for moving
dram_addr = dma_dram_addr - s->dram_mr->container->addr;

Finally, the following APIs could work properly.
data = address_space_ldl_le(&s->dram_as, dram_addr,
                       MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, &result);
Thanks-Jamin
> > +    } else {
> > +        dram_addr = dma_dram_addr;
> > +    }
> >
> >       trace_aspeed_smc_dma_rw(s->regs[R_DMA_CTRL] &
> DMA_CTRL_WRITE ?
> >                               "write" : "read",
> >                               s->regs[R_DMA_FLASH_ADDR],
> > -                            s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR],
> > +                            dram_addr,
> >                               dma_len);
> >       while (dma_len) {
> >           if (s->regs[R_DMA_CTRL] & DMA_CTRL_WRITE) {
> > -            data = address_space_ldl_le(&s->dram_as,
> s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR],
> > +            data = address_space_ldl_le(&s->dram_as, dram_addr,
> >
> MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, &result);
> >               if (result != MEMTX_OK) {
> > -                aspeed_smc_error("DRAM read failed @%08x",
> > -                                 s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR]);
> > +                aspeed_smc_error("DRAM read failed @%" PRIx64,
> > + dram_addr);
> >                   return;
> >               }
> >
> > @@ -951,11 +991,10 @@ static void aspeed_smc_dma_rw(AspeedSMCState
> *s)
> >                   return;
> >               }
> >
> > -            address_space_stl_le(&s->dram_as,
> s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR],
> > +            address_space_stl_le(&s->dram_as, dram_addr,
> >                                    data,
> MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, &result);
> >               if (result != MEMTX_OK) {
> > -                aspeed_smc_error("DRAM write failed @%08x",
> > -                                 s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR]);
> > +                aspeed_smc_error("DRAM write failed @%" PRIx64,
> > + dram_addr);
> >                   return;
> >               }
> >           }
> > @@ -964,8 +1003,15 @@ static void aspeed_smc_dma_rw(AspeedSMCState
> *s)
> >            * When the DMA is on-going, the DMA registers are updated
> >            * with the current working addresses and length.
> >            */
> > +        dram_addr += 4;
> > +        dma_dram_addr += 4;
> > +        if (aspeed_smc_has_dma_dram_addr_high(asc)) {
> > +            dram_addr_high = dma_dram_addr >> 32;
> > +            s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH] = dram_addr_high;
> 
>              s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH] = dma_dram_addr >>
> 32;
> 
> > +        }
> > +
> > +        s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR] = dma_dram_addr & 0xffffffff;
> 
> use DMA_DRAM_ADDR() may be instead.
> 
> >           s->regs[R_DMA_FLASH_ADDR] += 4;
> > -        s->regs[R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR] += 4;
> >           dma_len -= 4;
> >           s->regs[R_DMA_LEN] = dma_len;
> >           s->regs[R_DMA_CHECKSUM] += data; @@ -1118,6 +1164,10
> @@
> > static void aspeed_smc_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t data,
> >       } else if (aspeed_smc_has_dma(asc) && addr == R_DMA_LEN &&
> >                  aspeed_smc_dma_granted(s)) {
> >           s->regs[addr] = DMA_LENGTH(value);
> > +    } else if (aspeed_smc_has_dma(asc) &&
> > +               aspeed_smc_has_dma_dram_addr_high(asc) &&
> > +               addr == R_DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH) {
> > +        s->regs[addr] = DMA_DRAM_ADDR_HIGH(value);
> >       } else {
> >           qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "%s: not implemented: 0x%"
> HWADDR_PRIx "\n",
> >                         __func__, addr); diff --git
> > a/hw/ssi/trace-events b/hw/ssi/trace-events index
> > 2d5bd2b83d..7b5ad6a939 100644
> > --- a/hw/ssi/trace-events
> > +++ b/hw/ssi/trace-events
> > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ aspeed_smc_do_snoop(int cs, int index, int dummies, int
> data) "CS%d index:0x%x d
> >   aspeed_smc_flash_write(int cs, uint64_t addr,  uint32_t size, uint64_t
> data, int mode) "CS%d @0x%" PRIx64 " size %u: 0x%" PRIx64" mode:%d"
> >   aspeed_smc_read(uint64_t addr,  uint32_t size, uint64_t data) "@0x%"
> PRIx64 " size %u: 0x%" PRIx64
> >   aspeed_smc_dma_checksum(uint32_t addr, uint32_t data) "0x%08x:
> 0x%08x"
> > -aspeed_smc_dma_rw(const char *dir, uint32_t flash_addr, uint32_t
> dram_addr, uint32_t size) "%s flash:@0x%08x dram:@0x%08x size:0x%08x"
> > +aspeed_smc_dma_rw(const char *dir, uint32_t flash_addr, uint64_t
> dram_addr, uint32_t size) "%s flash:@0x%08x dram:@0x%" PRIx64 "
> size:0x%08x"
> >   aspeed_smc_write(uint64_t addr,  uint32_t size, uint64_t data) "@0x%"
> PRIx64 " size %u: 0x%" PRIx64
> >   aspeed_smc_flash_select(int cs, const char *prefix) "CS%d %sselect"
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-19  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-16  9:18 [PATCH v3 00/16] Add AST2700 support Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] aspeed/wdt: " Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] aspeed/sli: " Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16 15:29   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] aspeed/sdmc: remove redundant macros Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16 15:30   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] aspeed/sdmc: fix coding style Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16 15:30   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] aspeed/sdmc: Add AST2700 support Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16 15:34   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] aspeed/smc: correct device description Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16 15:34   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] aspeed/smc: fix dma moving incorrect data length issue Jamin Lin via
2024-04-19 13:41   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-30  7:22     ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-30  8:51       ` Jamin Lin
2024-05-03 14:35         ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-15  4:05           ` Jamin Lin
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] aspeed/smc: support 64 bits dma dram address Jamin Lin via
2024-04-18 16:09   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-19  6:00     ` Jamin Lin [this message]
2024-04-30  7:26       ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-30  7:56         ` Jamin Lin
2024-05-03 14:20           ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-15  8:56             ` Jamin Lin
2024-05-07 14:19   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-15  9:01     ` Jamin Lin
2024-05-17  7:57       ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-20  2:40         ` Jamin Lin
2024-05-27  6:46           ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-27  6:48             ` Jamin Lin
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] aspeed/smc: Add AST2700 support Jamin Lin via
2024-04-18 16:14   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] aspeed/scu: " Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] aspeed/intc: " Jamin Lin via
2024-05-07 13:33   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-21  6:40     ` Jamin Lin
2024-05-21  7:44       ` Jamin Lin
2024-04-16  9:18 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] aspeed/soc: " Jamin Lin via
2024-04-19  7:10   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-19  7:58     ` Jamin Lin
2024-05-17  7:58       ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-17  9:13         ` Jamin Lin
2024-05-07 13:06   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16  9:19 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] aspeed: Add an AST2700 eval board Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16  9:19 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] aspeed/soc: fix incorrect dram size for AST2700 Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16  9:19 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] test/avocado/machine_aspeed.py: Add AST2700 test case Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16 16:44   ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-04-16  9:19 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] docs:aspeed: Add AST2700 Evaluation board Jamin Lin via
2024-04-16 15:54   ` Cédric Le Goater

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SEYPR06MB50377414AEA2C2CAEF28A5E8FC0D2@SEYPR06MB5037.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=jamin_lin@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=alistair@alistair23.me \
    --cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=bleal@redhat.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=troy_lee@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    --cc=yunlin.tang@aspeedtech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).