Linux-Media Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
	Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>,
	"open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:INTEL DRM DISPLAY FOR XE AND I915 DRIVERS"
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:INTEL GVT-g DRIVERS (Intel GPU Virtualization)"
	<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS"
	<amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
	<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"open list:I2C SUBSYSTEM HOST DRIVERS"
	<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:BTTV VIDEO4LINUX DRIVER" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:FRAMEBUFFER LAYER" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Zhi Wang <zhiwang@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915: Make I2C terminology more inclusive
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 14:04:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4f1e429c-794b-457c-ab1d-85eb97dc81c3@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZjU8NB-71xWI2X73@intel.com>

On 5/3/2024 12:34 PM, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2024 at 06:13:24PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
>> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
>> in the specification.
>>
>> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> 
> It looks like the ack is not needed since we are merging this through
> drm-intel-next. But I'm planing to merge this only after seeing the
> main drivers/i2c accepting the new terminology. So we don't have a
> risk of that getting push back and new names there and we having
> to rename it once again.

Just to be explicit, did you want me to remove the Acked-by in v3, or will you when you pull
the patch into drm-intel-next?

> 
> (more below)
> 
>> Acked-by: Zhi Wang <zhiwang@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> 
> Jani, what bits were you concerned that were not necessarily i2c?
> I believe although not necessarily/directly i2c, I believe they
> are related and could benefit from the massive single shot renable.
> or do you have any better split to suggest here?
> 
> (more below)
> 
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7017.c     | 14 ++++-----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ch7xxx.c     | 18 +++++------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ivch.c       | 16 +++++-----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_ns2501.c     | 18 +++++------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_sil164.c     | 18 +++++------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/dvo_tfp410.c     | 18 +++++------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c     | 22 +++++++-------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c      |  2 +-
>>  .../gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_core.h |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi.h      |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c  | 20 ++++++-------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo.c      | 14 ++++-----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dvo_dev.h  |  2 +-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c    |  4 +--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_sdvo.c     | 30 +++++++++----------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vbt_defs.h |  4 +--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.c               | 28 ++++++++---------
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/edid.h               |  4 +--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/opregion.c           |  2 +-
>>  19 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
>>

<snip>

>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> index c17462b4c2ac..64db211148a8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
>> @@ -4332,7 +4332,7 @@ static int intel_ddi_compute_config_late(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>  									connector->tile_group->id);
>>  
>>  	/*
>> -	 * EDP Transcoders cannot be ensalved
>> +	 * EDP Transcoders cannot be slaves
> 
>                                      ^ here
> perhaps you meant 'targeted' ?
> 
>>  	 * make them a master always when present

<snip>

This is not actually I2C related as far as I could tell when I was making the change, so this was more of a typo fix.

If we want to improve this, a quick check with the eDP v1.5a spec suggests using primary/secondary instead,
though in a global fashion rather than specifically for eDP transcoders. There is also source/sink terminology
in the spec related to DP encoders.

Which would be a more acceptable change here?

Thanks,
Easwar

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-03 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-03 18:13 [PATCH v2 00/12] Make I2C terminology more inclusive for I2C Algobit and consumers Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/amdgpu, drm/radeon: Make I2C terminology more inclusive Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-07 18:16   ` Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-08 14:53     ` Alex Deucher
2024-05-08 20:12       ` Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-08 21:12         ` Alex Deucher
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/gma500: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 19:34   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-03 21:04     ` Easwar Hariharan [this message]
2024-05-03 21:14       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-05-06  9:06         ` Jani Nikula
2024-05-06  9:17     ` Andi Shyti
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] media: au0828: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] media: cobalt: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] media: cx18: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] media: cx25821: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] media: ivtv: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] media: cx23885: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] sfc: falcon: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] fbdev/smscufx: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-06  9:21   ` Thomas Zimmermann
2024-05-03 18:13 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] fbdev/viafb: " Easwar Hariharan
2024-05-06  9:22   ` Thomas Zimmermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4f1e429c-794b-457c-ab1d-85eb97dc81c3@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=eahariha@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhiwang@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).