KVM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
	<pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	<konrad.wilk@oracle.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <seanjc@google.com>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <nik.borisov@suse.com>,
	<kpsingh@kernel.org>, <longman@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Set BHI_NO in guest when host is not affected by BHI
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 23:56:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZhgIN4LIu2K5vf5y@chao-email> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABgObfa_mkk-c3NZ623WzYDxw59NcYB_tEQ8tFX4CECHW3JxQQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 05:20:30PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 5:13 PM Alexandre Chartre
><alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> wrote:
>> I think that Andrew's concern is that if there is no eIBRS on the host then
>> we do not set X86_BUG_BHI on the host because we know the kernel which is
>> running and this kernel has some mitigations (other than the explicit BHI
>> mitigations) and these mitigations are enough to prevent BHI. But still
>> the cpu is affected by BHI.
>
>Hmm, then I'm confused. It's what I wrote before: "The (Linux or
>otherwise) guest will make its own determinations as to whether BHI
>mitigations are necessary. If the guest uses eIBRS, it will run with
>mitigations" but you said machines without eIBRS are fine.
>
>If instead they are only fine _with Linux_, then yeah we cannot set
>BHI_NO in general. What we can do is define a new bit that is in the
>KVM leaves. The new bit is effectively !eIBRS, except that it is
>defined in such a way that, in a mixed migration pool, both eIBRS and
>the new bit will be 0.

This looks a good solution.

We can also introduce a new bit indicating the effectiveness of the short
BHB-clearing sequence. KVM advertises this bit for all pre-SPR/ADL parts.
Only if the bit is 1, guests will use the short BHB-clearing sequence.
Otherwise guests should use the long sequence. In a mixed migration pool,
the VMM shouldn't expose the bit to guests.

>
>Paolo
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-11 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-11  7:24 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Set BHI_NO in guest when host is not affected by BHI Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-11  7:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-04-11  7:49   ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-11  7:51 ` Greg KH
2024-04-11  8:00   ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-11  7:51 ` Nikolay Borisov
2024-04-11  8:43 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-04-11  9:33   ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-11  9:38     ` Andrew Cooper
2024-04-11 11:14       ` Chao Gao
2024-04-11 13:20         ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-15 15:14           ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-15 17:17             ` Dave Hansen
2024-04-16  8:41               ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-25 20:45                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2024-04-11 13:22     ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-11 13:32       ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-11 14:13         ` Andrew Cooper
2024-04-11 14:33           ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-11 14:46             ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-11 15:12               ` Alexandre Chartre
2024-04-11 15:20                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-04-11 15:56                   ` Chao Gao [this message]
2024-04-11 20:50                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2024-04-12  3:24                       ` Chao Gao
2024-04-12 16:33                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZhgIN4LIu2K5vf5y@chao-email \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).