KVM Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Sanity check that __kvm_faultin_pfn() doesn't create noslot pfns
Date: Tue,  7 May 2024 11:58:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240507155817.3951344-18-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507155817.3951344-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>

WARN if __kvm_faultin_pfn() generates a "no slot" pfn, and gracefully
handle the unexpected behavior instead of continuing on with dangerous
state, e.g. tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level() _only_ checks fault->slot,
and so could install a bogus PFN into the guest.

The existing code is functionally ok, because kvm_faultin_pfn() pre-checks
all of the cases that result in KVM_PFN_NOSLOT, but it is unnecessarily
unsafe as it relies on __gfn_to_pfn_memslot() getting the _exact_ same
memslot, i.e. not a re-retrieved pointer with KVM_MEMSLOT_INVALID set.
And checking only fault->slot would fall apart if KVM ever added a flag or
condition that forced emulation, similar to how KVM handles writes to
read-only memslots.

Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20240228024147.41573-17-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index d717d60c6f19..510eb1117012 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -4425,7 +4425,7 @@ static int kvm_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
 	if (unlikely(is_error_pfn(fault->pfn)))
 		return kvm_handle_error_pfn(vcpu, fault);
 
-	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fault->slot))
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!fault->slot || is_noslot_pfn(fault->pfn)))
 		return kvm_handle_noslot_fault(vcpu, fault, access);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.43.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-07 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-07 15:58 [PATCH v2 00/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Page fault and MMIO cleanups Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 01/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Exit to userspace with -EFAULT if private fault hits emulation Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  5:25   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 02/17] KVM: x86: Remove separate "bit" defines for page fault error code masks Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  5:29   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 03/17] KVM: x86: Define more SEV+ page fault error bits/flags for #NPF Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 04/17] KVM: x86: Move synthetic PFERR_* sanity checks to SVM's #NPF handler Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  5:50   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-13 17:31     ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-14  4:25       ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-14 15:32         ` Sean Christopherson
2024-05-15  1:03           ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 05/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass full 64-bit error code when handling page faults Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 06/17] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN if upper 32 bits of legacy #PF error code are non-zero Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 07/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Use synthetic page fault error code to indicate private faults Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  5:56   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 08/17] KVM: x86/mmu: check for invalid async page faults involving private memory Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 09/17] KVM: x86/mmu: WARN and skip MMIO cache on private, reserved page faults Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  6:15   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 10/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Move private vs. shared check above slot validity checks Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  6:22   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 11/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Don't force emulation of L2 accesses to non-APIC internal slots Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 12/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Explicitly disallow private accesses to emulated MMIO Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  6:26   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 13/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Move slot checks from __kvm_faultin_pfn() to kvm_faultin_pfn() Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  6:27   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 14/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle no-slot faults at the beginning of kvm_faultin_pfn() Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  6:28   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 15/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Set kvm_page_fault.hva to KVM_HVA_ERR_BAD for "no slot" faults Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  6:28   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` [PATCH 16/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Initialize kvm_page_fault's pfn and hva to error values Paolo Bonzini
2024-05-13  6:29   ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-05-07 15:58 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2024-05-13  6:40   ` [PATCH 17/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Sanity check that __kvm_faultin_pfn() doesn't create noslot pfns Xiaoyao Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240507155817.3951344-18-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).