Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] rebase: preserve interactive todo file on checkout failure
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 21:31:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq355u7ota.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZBzfZZWthdEM+gKK@ugly> (Oswald Buddenhagen's message of "Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:23:17 +0100")

Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:16:47PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> writes:
>>
>>> Creating a suitable todo file is a potentially labor-intensive process,
>>> so be less cavalier about discarding it when something goes wrong (e.g.,
>>> the user messed with the repo while editing the todo).
>>
>>Is there a reason why we do not always keep it?  Why is the file
>>sometimes precious but not precious at all in other times?
>>
> the unedited initial todo just isn't precious. that implies that in a
> non-interactive rebase, it is always worthless at the time of the
> initial reset.

I see.  Thanks for clarifying.

Just FYI, the primary purpose reviewers ask questions on the
proposed change is to help submitters polish their patch (both the
proposed log message text and the code) to clarify points they found
hard to understand and/or they suspect would be hard to understand
for other readers.  So please do not be happy by just receiving "I
see, thanks" and stop there.  Instead, please update the patch so
that future readers would not have to ask similar question again.

>>(and if you can reliably ensure that the file has contents
>>that are expected, that would be even better)?
>>
> i could grep for a shortened sha1 i would obtain from the branch. but
> given that the error scenario of a present but somehow corrupted todo
> seems implausible given the circumstances, that seems like overkill.

It is OK.  If it were easy to prepare the "todo should look like
this" golden copy, then doing test_cmp the actual file with it would
have been a simple way to ensure both existence of and sane contents
in the file at the same time, but if it isn't cheap to prepare such
an expected output, I agree with you that it is not worth the extra
effort.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24  4:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23 16:22 [PATCH 0/8] sequencer refactoring Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] rebase: simplify code related to imply_merge() Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:40   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 20:00     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-23 21:08       ` Felipe Contreras
2023-08-09 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 0/3] rebase refactoring Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-09 17:15         ` [PATCH v2 1/3] rebase: simplify code related to imply_merge() Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-09 17:15         ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rebase: handle --strategy via imply_merge() as well Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-09 17:15         ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rebase: move parse_opt_keep_empty() down Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-15 14:01           ` Phillip Wood
2023-10-20  9:36         ` [PATCH v3 0/3] rebase refactoring Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-20  9:36           ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rebase: simplify code related to imply_merge() Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-20  9:36           ` [PATCH v3 2/3] rebase: handle --strategy via imply_merge() as well Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-20 21:51             ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-20  9:36           ` [PATCH v3 3/3] rebase: move parse_opt_keep_empty() down Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-20 22:07           ` [PATCH v3 0/3] rebase refactoring Junio C Hamano
2023-10-23 15:43             ` Phillip Wood
2023-10-23 19:02               ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] rebase: move parse_opt_keep_empty() down Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:39   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] sequencer: pass around rebase action explicitly Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:27   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 21:27     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] sequencer: create enum for edit_todo_list() return value Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:27   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] rebase: preserve interactive todo file on checkout failure Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:31   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 22:38     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-24 14:15       ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-24 14:42         ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 20:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-23 23:23     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-24  4:31       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 6/8] sequencer: simplify allocation of result array in todo_list_rearrange_squash() Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:46   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 22:13     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 7/8] sequencer: pass `onto` to complete_action() as object-id Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:34   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 21:36     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-24 14:18       ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 8/8] rebase: improve resumption from incorrect initial todo list Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-26 14:28   ` Phillip Wood
2023-04-26 15:34     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-05-17 12:13       ` Phillip Wood
2023-08-24 16:46         ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] sequencer refactoring Phillip Wood
2023-03-25 11:08 ` Phillip Wood
2023-04-06 12:09   ` Phillip Wood
2023-05-17 13:10 ` Phillip Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq355u7ota.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).