Git Mailing List Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] rebase: preserve interactive todo file on checkout failure
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 00:23:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBzfZZWthdEM+gKK@ugly> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8rfn8bps.fsf@gitster.g>

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:16:47PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de> writes:
>
>> Creating a suitable todo file is a potentially labor-intensive process,
>> so be less cavalier about discarding it when something goes wrong (e.g.,
>> the user messed with the repo while editing the todo).
>
>Is there a reason why we do not always keep it?  Why is the file
>sometimes precious but not precious at all in other times?
>
the unedited initial todo just isn't precious. that implies that in a 
non-interactive rebase, it is always worthless at the time of the 
initial reset.

>Tying the previous bit to "-i was explicitly given" feels a bit
>unintuitive---when the sequencer machinery was implicitly chosen,
>and gives the control back to the user, should a user be forbidden
>to muck with the todo list?
>
that would be an --edit-todo and --continue during a mid-rebase stop.  
rather different case.

>No // comments, please.
>
(apparently with a special exception for examples in the apidocs, 
presumably because escaping nested comments would be just too ugly.)

>> -	test_path_is_missing .git/rebase-merge &&
>> +	test_path_is_dir .git/rebase-merge &&
>
>Are we happy to just see that the directory still exists?  I thought
>the original motivation explained in the proposed log message was to
>keep the todo list file, so shouldn't you be checking if the file is
>there
>
fair point.

>(and if you can reliably ensure that the file has contents
>that are expected, that would be even better)?
>
i could grep for a shortened sha1 i would obtain from the branch. but 
given that the error scenario of a present but somehow corrupted todo 
seems implausible given the circumstances, that seems like overkill.

>Also, as the keeping of the todo list is now conditional, we should
>have another test that checks that the file is gone when that
>condition ("INTERACTIVE_EXPLICIT"?) does not trigger, I think.
>
that would be for t3400-rebase.sh.
i suppose we could extend 'Show verbose error when HEAD could not be 
detached'.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-23 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23 16:22 [PATCH 0/8] sequencer refactoring Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/8] rebase: simplify code related to imply_merge() Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:40   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 20:00     ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-23 21:08       ` Felipe Contreras
2023-08-09 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 0/3] rebase refactoring Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-09 17:15         ` [PATCH v2 1/3] rebase: simplify code related to imply_merge() Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-09 17:15         ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rebase: handle --strategy via imply_merge() as well Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-09 17:15         ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rebase: move parse_opt_keep_empty() down Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-08-15 14:01           ` Phillip Wood
2023-10-20  9:36         ` [PATCH v3 0/3] rebase refactoring Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-20  9:36           ` [PATCH v3 1/3] rebase: simplify code related to imply_merge() Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-20  9:36           ` [PATCH v3 2/3] rebase: handle --strategy via imply_merge() as well Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-20 21:51             ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-20  9:36           ` [PATCH v3 3/3] rebase: move parse_opt_keep_empty() down Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-10-20 22:07           ` [PATCH v3 0/3] rebase refactoring Junio C Hamano
2023-10-23 15:43             ` Phillip Wood
2023-10-23 19:02               ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] rebase: move parse_opt_keep_empty() down Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:39   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 3/8] sequencer: pass around rebase action explicitly Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:27   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 21:27     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 4/8] sequencer: create enum for edit_todo_list() return value Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:27   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 5/8] rebase: preserve interactive todo file on checkout failure Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:31   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 22:38     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-24 14:15       ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-24 14:42         ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 20:16   ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-23 23:23     ` Oswald Buddenhagen [this message]
2023-03-24  4:31       ` Junio C Hamano
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 6/8] sequencer: simplify allocation of result array in todo_list_rearrange_squash() Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:46   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 22:13     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 7/8] sequencer: pass `onto` to complete_action() as object-id Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:34   ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 21:36     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-24 14:18       ` Phillip Wood
2023-03-23 16:22 ` [PATCH 8/8] rebase: improve resumption from incorrect initial todo list Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-26 14:28   ` Phillip Wood
2023-04-26 15:34     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-05-17 12:13       ` Phillip Wood
2023-08-24 16:46         ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2023-03-23 19:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] sequencer refactoring Phillip Wood
2023-03-25 11:08 ` Phillip Wood
2023-04-06 12:09   ` Phillip Wood
2023-05-17 13:10 ` Phillip Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBzfZZWthdEM+gKK@ugly \
    --to=oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).