From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next] fs: dlm: fix nfs async lock callback handling
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 17:56:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230606215626.327239-1-aahringo@redhat.com> (raw)
This patch is fixing the current the callback handling if it's a nfs
async lock request signaled if fl_lmops is set.
When using `stress-ng --fcntl 32` on the kernel log there are several
messages like:
[11185.123533] dlm: dlm_plock_callback: vfs lock error 5d5127 file 000000002dd10f4d fl 000000007d13afae
[11185.127135] dlm: dlm_plock_callback: vfs lock error 5d5127 file 000000002dd10f4d fl 00000000a6046fa0
[11185.142668] dlm: dlm_plock_callback: vfs lock error 5d5127 file 000000002dd10f4d fl 000000001d13dfa5
The commit 40595cdc93ed ("nfs: block notification on fs with its
own ->lock") using only trylocks in an asynchronous polling behaviour. The
behaviour before was however differently by evaluating F_SETLKW or F_SETLK
and evaluating FL_SLEEP which was the case before commit 40595cdc93ed
("nfs: block notification on fs with its own ->lock"). This behaviour
seems to be broken before. This patch will fix the behaviour for the
special nfs case before commit 40595cdc93ed ("nfs: block notification on
fs with its own ->lock").
There is still a TODO of solving the case when an nfs locking request
got interrupted.
Fixes: 40595cdc93ed ("nfs: block notification on fs with its own ->lock")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
---
fs/dlm/plock.c | 22 +---------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
index 70a4752ed913..6f0ecb2176b0 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
@@ -217,27 +217,7 @@ static int dlm_plock_callback(struct plock_op *op)
fl = op_data->fl;
notify = op_data->callback;
- if (op->info.rv) {
- notify(fl, op->info.rv);
- goto out;
- }
-
- /* got fs lock; bookkeep locally as well: */
- flc->fl_flags &= ~FL_SLEEP;
- if (posix_lock_file(file, flc, NULL)) {
- /*
- * This can only happen in the case of kmalloc() failure.
- * The filesystem's own lock is the authoritative lock,
- * so a failure to get the lock locally is not a disaster.
- * As long as the fs cannot reliably cancel locks (especially
- * in a low-memory situation), we're better off ignoring
- * this failure than trying to recover.
- */
- log_print("dlm_plock_callback: vfs lock error %llx file %p fl %p",
- (unsigned long long)op->info.number, file, fl);
- }
-
- rv = notify(fl, 0);
+ rv = notify(fl, op->info.rv);
if (rv) {
/* XXX: We need to cancel the fs lock here: */
log_print("dlm_plock_callback: lock granted after lock request "
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-06 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-06 21:56 Alexander Aring [this message]
2023-06-06 21:58 ` [Cluster-devel] [PATCH dlm/next] fs: dlm: fix nfs async lock callback handling Alexander Aring
2023-06-07 7:35 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230606215626.327239-1-aahringo@redhat.com \
--to=aahringo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).