From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:48:07 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZgGqx0Lg9FH217Wc@p14s> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240308144708.62362-4-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:47:07PM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > To prepare for the support of TEE remoteproc, create sub-functions > that can be used in both cases, with and without TEE support. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > index 88623df7d0c3..8cd838df4e92 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > @@ -209,6 +209,54 @@ static int stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(struct rproc *rproc, const unsigned char *name) > return -EINVAL; > } > > +static void stm32_rproc_request_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > + int err, dummy_data, idx; > + > + /* Request shutdown of the remote processor */ > + if (rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE && rproc->state != RPROC_CRASHED) { > + idx = stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(rproc, STM32_MBX_SHUTDOWN); > + if (idx >= 0 && ddata->mb[idx].chan) { > + /* A dummy data is sent to allow to block on transmit. */ > + err = mbox_send_message(ddata->mb[idx].chan, > + &dummy_data); Why is this changed from the original implementation? > + if (err < 0) > + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "warning: remote FW shutdown without ack\n"); > + } > + } > +} > + > +static int stm32_rproc_release(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > + unsigned int err = 0; > + > + /* To allow platform Standby power mode, set remote proc Deep Sleep. */ > + if (ddata->pdds.map) { > + err = regmap_update_bits(ddata->pdds.map, ddata->pdds.reg, > + ddata->pdds.mask, 1); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to set pdds\n"); > + return err; > + } > + } > + > + /* Update coprocessor state to OFF if available. */ > + if (ddata->m4_state.map) { > + err = regmap_update_bits(ddata->m4_state.map, > + ddata->m4_state.reg, > + ddata->m4_state.mask, > + M4_STATE_OFF); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to set copro state\n"); > + return err; > + } > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; > @@ -519,17 +567,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) > static int stm32_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > - int err, idx; > + int err; > > - /* request shutdown of the remote processor */ > - if (rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE && rproc->state != RPROC_CRASHED) { > - idx = stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(rproc, STM32_MBX_SHUTDOWN); > - if (idx >= 0 && ddata->mb[idx].chan) { > - err = mbox_send_message(ddata->mb[idx].chan, "detach"); > - if (err < 0) > - dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "warning: remote FW shutdown without ack\n"); > - } > - } > + stm32_rproc_request_shutdown(rproc); > > err = stm32_rproc_set_hold_boot(rproc, true); > if (err) > @@ -541,29 +581,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > return err; > } > > - /* to allow platform Standby power mode, set remote proc Deep Sleep */ > - if (ddata->pdds.map) { > - err = regmap_update_bits(ddata->pdds.map, ddata->pdds.reg, > - ddata->pdds.mask, 1); > - if (err) { > - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to set pdds\n"); > - return err; > - } > - } > - > - /* update coprocessor state to OFF if available */ > - if (ddata->m4_state.map) { > - err = regmap_update_bits(ddata->m4_state.map, > - ddata->m4_state.reg, > - ddata->m4_state.mask, > - M4_STATE_OFF); > - if (err) { > - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to set copro state\n"); > - return err; > - } > - } > - > - return 0; > + return stm32_rproc_release(rproc); > } > > static void stm32_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) > -- > 2.25.1 >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:48:07 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <ZgGqx0Lg9FH217Wc@p14s> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240308144708.62362-4-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 03:47:07PM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: > To prepare for the support of TEE remoteproc, create sub-functions > that can be used in both cases, with and without TEE support. > > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > index 88623df7d0c3..8cd838df4e92 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c > @@ -209,6 +209,54 @@ static int stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(struct rproc *rproc, const unsigned char *name) > return -EINVAL; > } > > +static void stm32_rproc_request_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > + int err, dummy_data, idx; > + > + /* Request shutdown of the remote processor */ > + if (rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE && rproc->state != RPROC_CRASHED) { > + idx = stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(rproc, STM32_MBX_SHUTDOWN); > + if (idx >= 0 && ddata->mb[idx].chan) { > + /* A dummy data is sent to allow to block on transmit. */ > + err = mbox_send_message(ddata->mb[idx].chan, > + &dummy_data); Why is this changed from the original implementation? > + if (err < 0) > + dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "warning: remote FW shutdown without ack\n"); > + } > + } > +} > + > +static int stm32_rproc_release(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > + unsigned int err = 0; > + > + /* To allow platform Standby power mode, set remote proc Deep Sleep. */ > + if (ddata->pdds.map) { > + err = regmap_update_bits(ddata->pdds.map, ddata->pdds.reg, > + ddata->pdds.mask, 1); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to set pdds\n"); > + return err; > + } > + } > + > + /* Update coprocessor state to OFF if available. */ > + if (ddata->m4_state.map) { > + err = regmap_update_bits(ddata->m4_state.map, > + ddata->m4_state.reg, > + ddata->m4_state.mask, > + M4_STATE_OFF); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to set copro state\n"); > + return err; > + } > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; > @@ -519,17 +567,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) > static int stm32_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv; > - int err, idx; > + int err; > > - /* request shutdown of the remote processor */ > - if (rproc->state != RPROC_OFFLINE && rproc->state != RPROC_CRASHED) { > - idx = stm32_rproc_mbox_idx(rproc, STM32_MBX_SHUTDOWN); > - if (idx >= 0 && ddata->mb[idx].chan) { > - err = mbox_send_message(ddata->mb[idx].chan, "detach"); > - if (err < 0) > - dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "warning: remote FW shutdown without ack\n"); > - } > - } > + stm32_rproc_request_shutdown(rproc); > > err = stm32_rproc_set_hold_boot(rproc, true); > if (err) > @@ -541,29 +581,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > return err; > } > > - /* to allow platform Standby power mode, set remote proc Deep Sleep */ > - if (ddata->pdds.map) { > - err = regmap_update_bits(ddata->pdds.map, ddata->pdds.reg, > - ddata->pdds.mask, 1); > - if (err) { > - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to set pdds\n"); > - return err; > - } > - } > - > - /* update coprocessor state to OFF if available */ > - if (ddata->m4_state.map) { > - err = regmap_update_bits(ddata->m4_state.map, > - ddata->m4_state.reg, > - ddata->m4_state.mask, > - M4_STATE_OFF); > - if (err) { > - dev_err(&rproc->dev, "failed to set copro state\n"); > - return err; > - } > - } > - > - return 0; > + return stm32_rproc_release(rproc); > } > > static void stm32_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid) > -- > 2.25.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-25 16:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-03-08 14:47 [PATCH v4 0/4] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-08 14:47 ` Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] remoteproc: Add TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-08 14:47 ` Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-10 3:18 ` kernel test robot 2024-03-10 3:18 ` kernel test robot 2024-03-25 16:46 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-25 16:46 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-26 19:18 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2024-03-26 19:18 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2024-03-27 17:07 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-27 17:07 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-29 8:58 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2024-03-29 8:58 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2024-04-01 15:54 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-04-01 15:54 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for " Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-08 14:47 ` Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-08 14:47 ` Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-25 16:48 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message] 2024-03-25 16:48 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-08 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-08 14:47 ` Arnaud Pouliquen 2024-03-25 16:51 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-25 16:51 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-26 19:31 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2024-03-26 19:31 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2024-03-27 17:14 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-27 17:14 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-03-29 10:57 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2024-03-29 10:57 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2024-04-01 15:46 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-04-01 15:46 ` Mathieu Poirier 2024-04-03 7:04 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN 2024-04-03 7:04 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=ZgGqx0Lg9FH217Wc@p14s \ --to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \ --cc=andersson@kernel.org \ --cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \ --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \ --cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.