All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gdt@linuxppc.org>
To: Kevin Buettner <kev@primenet.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org,
	Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>,
	"Kevin B. Hendricks" <kbhend@business.wm.edu>
Subject: Re: gdb broken under linuxppc r5 tools
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 05:20:54 -0600 (MDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <XFMail.990802052054.gdt@linuxppc.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <990801202455.ZM22552@redrock.lan>



On 01-Aug-99 Kevin Buettner wrote:
> 
> On Aug 1,  9:03pm, Franz Sirl wrote:
> 
>> Am Son, 01 Aug 1999 schrieb Kevin B. Hendricks:
>> >Hey,
>> >
>> >Does anyone know what's up with gdb lately?  It used to be quite stable but
>> >since I upgraded to the glibc, binutils, egcs, gdb from Linuxppc R5 cd, I
>> >can't seem to set any breakpoints in shared libraries (or they show up
>> >someplace else at random).  Functions are missing (or don't show up) and if
>> >I try to disassemble one function in a shared library, I often get another.
>> >
>> >I really need a working stable gdb.
>> >
>> >Has anyone else run into this.  If so, exactly what versions of gdb, glibc,
>> >binutils, egcs are stable together, especially when working with shared
>> >libraries?
>> 
>> Well, you've hit one of our weakest points here. AFAIK there's currently
>> nobody
>> taking care of gdb on Linux/PPC. In fact we are lucky that Kevin Buettner's
>> old
>> patch could be converted to 4.17.x. Unfortunately it's still not integrated
>> into gdb's mainline due to copyright issues, so we have to reintegrate the
>> patch
>> in every new version :-(.
>> 
>> So, is someone willing to take care of gdb on Linux/PPC?
> 
> Kevin, Franz, et.al,
> 
> Earlier this year, Metrowerks and I signed the copyright assignments
> required by the FSF.  Beginning August 9, I will be starting work at
> Cygnus as a GDB engineer.  One of the things that I'll work on is a
> merge of my patches into the current gdb mainline.  It'll be my goal
> to get a solid, usable gdb up and running on Linux/PPC again.
> 

Kevin B.,

Firstly, congratulations and welcome to the fold :-)

Secondly, while you're in there, can you look at my patches for GDB-4.18.
I've made a useable GDB for this version, with no input from any of the
4.17 patches BTW.  They might be easier to make into a "clean" set for
the latest version.  You can find my patches in the RPM I uploaded to
  ftp://ftp.linuxppc.org/users/gdt/redhat/SRPMS

When you get something ready, let me know and I'll help check it out.

Thanks.

[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list.  Replies are ]]
[[ not  forced  back  to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting.   ]]

  parent reply	other threads:[~1999-08-02 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-08-01 13:01 current recommended versions of glibc/egcs/binutils for R5? R Shapiro
1999-08-01 13:58 ` Franz Sirl
1999-08-01 18:38   ` gdb broken under linuxppc r5 tools Kevin B. Hendricks
1999-08-01 19:03     ` Franz Sirl
1999-08-01 20:12       ` kbhend
1999-08-01 20:24       ` Kevin Buettner
1999-08-01 20:54         ` Franz Sirl
1999-08-02 11:20         ` Gary Thomas [this message]
1999-08-02 15:21         ` kbhend
1999-08-02 15:50           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1999-08-02 16:01         ` kbhend
1999-08-22 15:09   ` bug in glibc 2.1.2 new semaphore functions in libpthread? Kevin Hendricks
1999-08-24 21:09     ` Franz Sirl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=XFMail.990802052054.gdt@linuxppc.org \
    --to=gdt@linuxppc.org \
    --cc=kev@primenet.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.