From: "Kevin Buettner" <kev@primenet.com>
To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <kbhend@business.wm.edu>,
Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: gdb broken under linuxppc r5 tools
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 20:24:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <990801202455.ZM22552@redrock.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> "Re: gdb broken under linuxppc r5 tools" (Aug 1, 9:03pm)
On Aug 1, 9:03pm, Franz Sirl wrote:
> Am Son, 01 Aug 1999 schrieb Kevin B. Hendricks:
> >Hey,
> >
> >Does anyone know what's up with gdb lately? It used to be quite stable but
> >since I upgraded to the glibc, binutils, egcs, gdb from Linuxppc R5 cd, I
> >can't seem to set any breakpoints in shared libraries (or they show up
> >someplace else at random). Functions are missing (or don't show up) and if
> >I try to disassemble one function in a shared library, I often get another.
> >
> >I really need a working stable gdb.
> >
> >Has anyone else run into this. If so, exactly what versions of gdb, glibc,
> >binutils, egcs are stable together, especially when working with shared
> >libraries?
>
> Well, you've hit one of our weakest points here. AFAIK there's currently nobody
> taking care of gdb on Linux/PPC. In fact we are lucky that Kevin Buettner's old
> patch could be converted to 4.17.x. Unfortunately it's still not integrated
> into gdb's mainline due to copyright issues, so we have to reintegrate the patch
> in every new version :-(.
>
> So, is someone willing to take care of gdb on Linux/PPC?
Kevin, Franz, et.al,
Earlier this year, Metrowerks and I signed the copyright assignments
required by the FSF. Beginning August 9, I will be starting work at
Cygnus as a GDB engineer. One of the things that I'll work on is a
merge of my patches into the current gdb mainline. It'll be my goal
to get a solid, usable gdb up and running on Linux/PPC again.
Kevin
--
Kevin Buettner
kev@primenet.com
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-08-01 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-08-01 13:01 current recommended versions of glibc/egcs/binutils for R5? R Shapiro
1999-08-01 13:58 ` Franz Sirl
1999-08-01 18:38 ` gdb broken under linuxppc r5 tools Kevin B. Hendricks
1999-08-01 19:03 ` Franz Sirl
1999-08-01 20:12 ` kbhend
1999-08-01 20:24 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
1999-08-01 20:54 ` Franz Sirl
1999-08-02 11:20 ` Gary Thomas
1999-08-02 15:21 ` kbhend
1999-08-02 15:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1999-08-02 16:01 ` kbhend
1999-08-22 15:09 ` bug in glibc 2.1.2 new semaphore functions in libpthread? Kevin Hendricks
1999-08-24 21:09 ` Franz Sirl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=990801202455.ZM22552@redrock.lan \
--to=kev@primenet.com \
--cc=Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com \
--cc=kbhend@business.wm.edu \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.