All the mail mirrored from lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm mailing list <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kmannth@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 2019] New: Bug from the mm subsystem involving X  (fwd)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:58:01 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041539470.2086@home.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51080000.1075936626@flay>



On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> 
> So there have been alot of X issue with Red Hat and 2.6 kernels.  I managed to
> get the system to panic and I decide it was time to open this bug.  I got this
> on boot up. 

Hmm. Compiler? Why would AS-3 in particular have problems?

> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0264d000
>  printing eip:
> c0147af4
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000 [#1]
> CPU:    7
> EIP:    0060:[<c0147af4>]    Not tainted
> EFLAGS: 00013206
> EIP is at remap_page_range+0x193/0x26c
> eax: 0264d000   ebx: 000f5200   ecx: 00000001   edx: dad0fa80
> esi: 001fe000   edi: d87c9ff0   ebp: f5200000   esp: d8835ee4
> ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
> Process X (pid: 1285, threadinfo=d8834000 task=d9474ce0)
> Stack: d961d580 001ff000 001ff000 40000000 f5002000 001fe000 d9578000 d961d580
>        401ff000 d9576508 00000000 f5200000 d961d580 00000001 c0247055 d87d62c0
>        401fe000 b5002000 00001000 00000027 d9388e80 00001000 c014a7fd d9388e80
> Call Trace:
>  [<c0247055>] mmap_mem+0x71/0xd4
>  [<c014a7fd>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x362/0x70d
>  [<c0156f65>] filp_open+0x67/0x69
>  [<c0111c4d>] sys_mmap2+0x7a/0xaa
>  [<c010aced>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71
> 
> Code: 8b 00 a9 00 08 00 00 74 10 89 d8 8b 54 24 4c c1 e8 14 09 ea

This _seems_ to be the code

		...
                if (!pfn_valid(pfn) || PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
                        set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, prot));
		...

in particular, it disassembles to

	0x8048490 <insn>:       mov    (%eax),%eax
	0x8048492 <insn+2>:     test   $0x800,%eax
	0x8048497 <insn+7>:     je     0x80484a9
	0x8048499 <insn+9>:     mov    %ebx,%eax
	0x804849b <insn+11>:    mov    0x4c(%esp,1),%edx
	0x804849f <insn+15>:    shr    $0x14,%eax

which seems to be the "PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn))" test.

This implies that you have either:
 - a buggy "pfn_valid()" macro (do you use CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM?)
 - or a buggy compiler (it sure ain't the compiler I use, since that one 
   will generate a "testb $8,%ah" instead)

It might help if you disassembled the code (in your kernel) around that 
point, since that might give a clue about it.

Quite honestly, to me it looks like the address being remapped is likely 
in %ebp (0xf5200000), and that pfn is in %ebx (0x000f5200), and that your 
pfn_valid() is buggered, causing a totally bogus "struct page *" from 
"pfn_to_page()".

		Linus

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm mailing list <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kmannth@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 2019] New: Bug from the mm subsystem involving X  (fwd)
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:58:01 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041539470.2086@home.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51080000.1075936626@flay>


On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> 
> So there have been alot of X issue with Red Hat and 2.6 kernels.  I managed to
> get the system to panic and I decide it was time to open this bug.  I got this
> on boot up. 

Hmm. Compiler? Why would AS-3 in particular have problems?

> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0264d000
>  printing eip:
> c0147af4
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000 [#1]
> CPU:    7
> EIP:    0060:[<c0147af4>]    Not tainted
> EFLAGS: 00013206
> EIP is at remap_page_range+0x193/0x26c
> eax: 0264d000   ebx: 000f5200   ecx: 00000001   edx: dad0fa80
> esi: 001fe000   edi: d87c9ff0   ebp: f5200000   esp: d8835ee4
> ds: 007b   es: 007b   ss: 0068
> Process X (pid: 1285, threadinfo=d8834000 task=d9474ce0)
> Stack: d961d580 001ff000 001ff000 40000000 f5002000 001fe000 d9578000 d961d580
>        401ff000 d9576508 00000000 f5200000 d961d580 00000001 c0247055 d87d62c0
>        401fe000 b5002000 00001000 00000027 d9388e80 00001000 c014a7fd d9388e80
> Call Trace:
>  [<c0247055>] mmap_mem+0x71/0xd4
>  [<c014a7fd>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x362/0x70d
>  [<c0156f65>] filp_open+0x67/0x69
>  [<c0111c4d>] sys_mmap2+0x7a/0xaa
>  [<c010aced>] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71
> 
> Code: 8b 00 a9 00 08 00 00 74 10 89 d8 8b 54 24 4c c1 e8 14 09 ea

This _seems_ to be the code

		...
                if (!pfn_valid(pfn) || PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn)))
                        set_pte(pte, pfn_pte(pfn, prot));
		...

in particular, it disassembles to

	0x8048490 <insn>:       mov    (%eax),%eax
	0x8048492 <insn+2>:     test   $0x800,%eax
	0x8048497 <insn+7>:     je     0x80484a9
	0x8048499 <insn+9>:     mov    %ebx,%eax
	0x804849b <insn+11>:    mov    0x4c(%esp,1),%edx
	0x804849f <insn+15>:    shr    $0x14,%eax

which seems to be the "PageReserved(pfn_to_page(pfn))" test.

This implies that you have either:
 - a buggy "pfn_valid()" macro (do you use CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM?)
 - or a buggy compiler (it sure ain't the compiler I use, since that one 
   will generate a "testb $8,%ah" instead)

It might help if you disassembled the code (in your kernel) around that 
point, since that might give a clue about it.

Quite honestly, to me it looks like the address being remapped is likely 
in %ebp (0xf5200000), and that pfn is in %ebx (0x000f5200), and that your 
pfn_valid() is buggered, causing a totally bogus "struct page *" from 
"pfn_to_page()".

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-05  0:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-04 23:17 [Bugme-new] [Bug 2019] New: Bug from the mm subsystem involving X (fwd) Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-04 23:17 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-04 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2004-02-04 23:58   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05  0:12   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-05  0:12     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-05  0:36     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-05  0:36       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-05  0:43       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05  0:43         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05  0:56         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-05  0:56           ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-05  1:29           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05  1:29             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05  1:56             ` Keith Mannthey
2004-02-05  1:56               ` Keith Mannthey
2004-02-05  2:04               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05  2:04                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05  2:33                 ` Keith Mannthey
2004-02-05  2:33                   ` Keith Mannthey
2004-02-05  2:47                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-05  2:47                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-06  7:17                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06  7:17                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06  7:19                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06  7:19                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06  9:57                   ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-06  9:57                     ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-06 15:49                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 15:49                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 17:22                       ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-06 17:22                         ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-06 19:59                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 19:59                           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 20:16                           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-06 20:16                             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-06 21:18                             ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 21:18                               ` Martin J. Bligh
     [not found] <51080000.1075936626@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041539470.2086@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]   ` <60330000.1075939958@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]     ` <64260000.1075941399@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]       ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041639420.2086@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]         ` <20040204165620.3d608798.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]           ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041719300.2086@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]             ` <1075946211.13163.18962.camel@dyn318004bld.beaverton.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]               ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041800320.2086@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]                 ` <98220000.1076051821@[10.10.2.4].suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]                   ` <1076061476.27855.1144.camel@nighthawk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]                     ` <5450000.1076082574@[10.10.2.4].suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]                       ` <1076088169.29478.2928.camel@nighthawk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]                         ` <218650000.1076097590@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]                           ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402061215030.30672@home.osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]                             ` <220850000.1076102320@flay.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-07  3:54                               ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-07  4:49                                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-07  5:21                                   ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-07  6:37                                   ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-07  7:31                                     ` Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041539470.2086@home.osdl.org \
    --to=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=kmannth@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.