From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com> To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>, Mohammed Billoo <mohammed.billoo@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mstar for v5.14 v2 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:03:49 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAFr9PXkeqryzutzpV6woskee_SwbDMJFgxPtspvTk0-VS6A5xA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210615152840.GD11724@lx2k> Hi Olof, On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 00:31, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > This time it seems like you based your branch on 5.14-rc5, which is a newer -rc > than what we have the rest of our trees on. The general rule of thumb is to > base it on the oldest meaningful rc for the release (rc1 or rc2, most of the > time). We normally base our tree on rc2 or so, in this case I went forward to > rc3 earlier. Sorry, I hadn't even thought of that but it makes sense. > (Maybe you had the same base last time around, and I missed it -- my tooling > failed out on the S-o-b checking before I noticed) Last one was rc5 too. > To avoid another roundtrip here, I'll apply the two patches directly, but > please keep it in mind in the future, especially once you have more material > for a cycle. Thanks for doing that and the hand holding. I think I can manage to get it right next time. :) I have one DTS patch I would like to get into 5.14 for the watchdog driver that was recently accepted. Is it still ok to send a PR for that one or is it too late now? I think I read the cut off is around rc6. Thanks, Daniel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com> To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Romain Perier <romain.perier@gmail.com>, Mohammed Billoo <mohammed.billoo@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: mstar for v5.14 v2 Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 01:03:49 +0900 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAFr9PXkeqryzutzpV6woskee_SwbDMJFgxPtspvTk0-VS6A5xA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20210615152840.GD11724@lx2k> Hi Olof, On Wed, 16 Jun 2021 at 00:31, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > This time it seems like you based your branch on 5.14-rc5, which is a newer -rc > than what we have the rest of our trees on. The general rule of thumb is to > base it on the oldest meaningful rc for the release (rc1 or rc2, most of the > time). We normally base our tree on rc2 or so, in this case I went forward to > rc3 earlier. Sorry, I hadn't even thought of that but it makes sense. > (Maybe you had the same base last time around, and I missed it -- my tooling > failed out on the S-o-b checking before I noticed) Last one was rc5 too. > To avoid another roundtrip here, I'll apply the two patches directly, but > please keep it in mind in the future, especially once you have more material > for a cycle. Thanks for doing that and the hand holding. I think I can manage to get it right next time. :) I have one DTS patch I would like to get into 5.14 for the watchdog driver that was recently accepted. Is it still ok to send a PR for that one or is it too late now? I think I read the cut off is around rc6. Thanks, Daniel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-15 16:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-12 17:39 [GIT PULL] ARM: mstar for v5.14 v2 Daniel Palmer 2021-06-12 17:39 ` Daniel Palmer 2021-06-15 15:28 ` Olof Johansson 2021-06-15 15:28 ` Olof Johansson 2021-06-15 16:03 ` Daniel Palmer [this message] 2021-06-15 16:03 ` Daniel Palmer 2021-06-15 16:03 ` Olof Johansson 2021-06-15 16:03 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAFr9PXkeqryzutzpV6woskee_SwbDMJFgxPtspvTk0-VS6A5xA@mail.gmail.com \ --to=daniel@0x0f.com \ --cc=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mohammed.billoo@gmail.com \ --cc=olof@lixom.net \ --cc=romain.perier@gmail.com \ --cc=soc@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.