From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Daniel Diaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Arthur Grillo" <arthurgrillo@riseup.net>,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
"Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Linux Kernel Functional Testing" <lkft@linaro.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/14] net: kunit: Suppress lock warning noise at end of dev_addr_lists tests
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:52:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325175248.1499046-7-linux@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325175248.1499046-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
dev_addr_lists_test generates lock warning noise at the end of tests
if lock debugging is enabled. There are two sets of warnings.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 689 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:923 __mutex_unlock_slowpath.constprop.0+0x13c/0x368
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner_task(owner) != __get_current())
WARNING: kunit_try_catch/1336 still has locks held!
KUnit test cleanup is not guaranteed to run in the same thread as the test
itself. For this test, this means that rtnl_lock() and rtnl_unlock() may
be called from different threads. This triggers the warnings.
Suppress the warnings because they are irrelevant for the test and just
confusing.
The first warning can be suppressed by using START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING()
and END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING() around the call to rtnl_unlock(). To suppress
the second warning, it is necessary to set debug_locks_silent while the
rtnl lock is held.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
- Rebased to v6.9-rc1
- Added Tested-by:, Acked-by:, and Reviewed-by: tags
net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
index 4dbd0dc6aea2..b427dd1a3c93 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Can't register netdev %d", err);
}
+ debug_locks_silent = 1;
rtnl_lock();
return 0;
}
@@ -56,8 +58,12 @@ static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
static void dev_addr_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
{
struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
+ START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
rtnl_unlock();
+ END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
+ debug_locks_silent = 0;
unregister_netdev(netdev);
free_netdev(netdev);
}
--
2.39.2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Daniel Diaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Arthur Grillo" <arthurgrillo@riseup.net>,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
"Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Linux Kernel Functional Testing" <lkft@linaro.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/14] net: kunit: Suppress lock warning noise at end of dev_addr_lists tests
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:52:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325175248.1499046-7-linux@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325175248.1499046-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
dev_addr_lists_test generates lock warning noise at the end of tests
if lock debugging is enabled. There are two sets of warnings.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 689 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:923 __mutex_unlock_slowpath.constprop.0+0x13c/0x368
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner_task(owner) != __get_current())
WARNING: kunit_try_catch/1336 still has locks held!
KUnit test cleanup is not guaranteed to run in the same thread as the test
itself. For this test, this means that rtnl_lock() and rtnl_unlock() may
be called from different threads. This triggers the warnings.
Suppress the warnings because they are irrelevant for the test and just
confusing.
The first warning can be suppressed by using START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING()
and END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING() around the call to rtnl_unlock(). To suppress
the second warning, it is necessary to set debug_locks_silent while the
rtnl lock is held.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
- Rebased to v6.9-rc1
- Added Tested-by:, Acked-by:, and Reviewed-by: tags
net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
index 4dbd0dc6aea2..b427dd1a3c93 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Can't register netdev %d", err);
}
+ debug_locks_silent = 1;
rtnl_lock();
return 0;
}
@@ -56,8 +58,12 @@ static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
static void dev_addr_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
{
struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
+ START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
rtnl_unlock();
+ END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
+ debug_locks_silent = 0;
unregister_netdev(netdev);
free_netdev(netdev);
}
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Daniel Diaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Arthur Grillo" <arthurgrillo@riseup.net>,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
"Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Linux Kernel Functional Testing" <lkft@linaro.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/14] net: kunit: Suppress lock warning noise at end of dev_addr_lists tests
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:52:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325175248.1499046-7-linux@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325175248.1499046-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
dev_addr_lists_test generates lock warning noise at the end of tests
if lock debugging is enabled. There are two sets of warnings.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 689 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:923 __mutex_unlock_slowpath.constprop.0+0x13c/0x368
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner_task(owner) != __get_current())
WARNING: kunit_try_catch/1336 still has locks held!
KUnit test cleanup is not guaranteed to run in the same thread as the test
itself. For this test, this means that rtnl_lock() and rtnl_unlock() may
be called from different threads. This triggers the warnings.
Suppress the warnings because they are irrelevant for the test and just
confusing.
The first warning can be suppressed by using START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING()
and END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING() around the call to rtnl_unlock(). To suppress
the second warning, it is necessary to set debug_locks_silent while the
rtnl lock is held.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
- Rebased to v6.9-rc1
- Added Tested-by:, Acked-by:, and Reviewed-by: tags
net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
index 4dbd0dc6aea2..b427dd1a3c93 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Can't register netdev %d", err);
}
+ debug_locks_silent = 1;
rtnl_lock();
return 0;
}
@@ -56,8 +58,12 @@ static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
static void dev_addr_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
{
struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
+ START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
rtnl_unlock();
+ END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
+ debug_locks_silent = 0;
unregister_netdev(netdev);
free_netdev(netdev);
}
--
2.39.2
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Brendan Higgins" <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Arthur Grillo" <arthurgrillo@riseup.net>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Daniel Diaz" <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
"Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
"Maíra Canal" <mcanal@igalia.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Functional Testing" <lkft@linaro.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"David Gow" <davidgow@google.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-parisc@vg
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/14] net: kunit: Suppress lock warning noise at end of dev_addr_lists tests
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 10:52:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240325175248.1499046-7-linux@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240325175248.1499046-1-linux@roeck-us.net>
dev_addr_lists_test generates lock warning noise at the end of tests
if lock debugging is enabled. There are two sets of warnings.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 689 at kernel/locking/mutex.c:923 __mutex_unlock_slowpath.constprop.0+0x13c/0x368
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(__owner_task(owner) != __get_current())
WARNING: kunit_try_catch/1336 still has locks held!
KUnit test cleanup is not guaranteed to run in the same thread as the test
itself. For this test, this means that rtnl_lock() and rtnl_unlock() may
be called from different threads. This triggers the warnings.
Suppress the warnings because they are irrelevant for the test and just
confusing.
The first warning can be suppressed by using START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING()
and END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING() around the call to rtnl_unlock(). To suppress
the second warning, it is necessary to set debug_locks_silent while the
rtnl lock is held.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
---
- Rebased to v6.9-rc1
- Added Tested-by:, Acked-by:, and Reviewed-by: tags
net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
index 4dbd0dc6aea2..b427dd1a3c93 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists_test.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/debug_locks.h>
#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Can't register netdev %d", err);
}
+ debug_locks_silent = 1;
rtnl_lock();
return 0;
}
@@ -56,8 +58,12 @@ static int dev_addr_test_init(struct kunit *test)
static void dev_addr_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
{
struct net_device *netdev = test->priv;
+ DEFINE_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
+ START_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
rtnl_unlock();
+ END_SUPPRESSED_WARNING(__mutex_unlock_slowpath);
+ debug_locks_silent = 0;
unregister_netdev(netdev);
free_netdev(netdev);
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-25 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 17:52 [PATCH v2 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] bug/kunit: Core " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] kunit: bug: Count suppressed " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] kunit: Add test cases for backtrace warning suppression Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] kunit: Add documentation for warning backtrace suppression API Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] drm: Suppress intentional warning backtraces in scaling unit tests Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 19:05 ` Maíra Canal
2024-03-25 19:05 ` Maíra Canal
2024-03-25 19:05 ` Maíra Canal
2024-03-25 19:05 ` Maíra Canal
2024-03-25 19:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 19:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 19:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 19:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-26 1:09 ` Maíra Canal
2024-03-26 1:09 ` Maíra Canal
2024-03-26 1:09 ` Maíra Canal
2024-03-26 1:09 ` Maíra Canal
2024-03-26 5:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-26 5:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-26 5:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-26 5:02 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] net: kunit: Suppress lock warning noise at end of dev_addr_lists tests Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] x86: Add support for suppressing warning backtraces Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] arm64: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] loongarch: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] parisc: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] s390: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] sh: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-27 14:44 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-27 14:44 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-27 14:44 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-27 14:44 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-27 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-27 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-27 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-27 15:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-27 19:39 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-27 19:39 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-27 19:39 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-27 19:39 ` Simon Horman
2024-03-29 15:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-29 15:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-29 15:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-29 15:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] riscv: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] powerpc: " Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-03-25 17:52 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240325175248.1499046-7-linux@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arthurgrillo@riseup.net \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.diaz@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkft@linaro.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mcanal@igalia.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.