From: Olaf Skibbe <news@kravcenko.com>
To: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
1042753@bugs.debian.org, Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>,
Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nouveau bug in linux/6.1.38-2
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 14:46:54 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a5084b7-732b-6658-653e-7ece4c0768c9@kravcenko.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACO55ttcUEUjdVgx4y7pv26VAGeHS5q1wVKWrMw5=o9QLaJLZw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 14:15, Karol Herbst wrote:
> mind retrying with only fb725beca62d and 62aecf23f3d1 reverted?
I will do this later this day (takes some time, it is a slow machine).
> Would be weird if the other two commits are causing it. If that's the
> case, it's a bit worrying that reverting either of the those causes
> issues, but maybe there is a good reason for it. Anyway, mind figuring
> out which of the two you need reverted to fix your issue? Thanks!
I can do this. But if I build two kernels anyway, isn't it faster to
build each with only one of the patches applied? Or do you expect the
patches to interact (so that the bug would only be present when both are
applied)?
Cheers,
Olaf
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Olaf Skibbe <news@kravcenko.com>
To: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, 1042753@bugs.debian.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: nouveau bug in linux/6.1.38-2
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 14:46:54 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a5084b7-732b-6658-653e-7ece4c0768c9@kravcenko.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACO55ttcUEUjdVgx4y7pv26VAGeHS5q1wVKWrMw5=o9QLaJLZw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 14:15, Karol Herbst wrote:
> mind retrying with only fb725beca62d and 62aecf23f3d1 reverted?
I will do this later this day (takes some time, it is a slow machine).
> Would be weird if the other two commits are causing it. If that's the
> case, it's a bit worrying that reverting either of the those causes
> issues, but maybe there is a good reason for it. Anyway, mind figuring
> out which of the two you need reverted to fix your issue? Thanks!
I can do this. But if I build two kernels anyway, isn't it faster to
build each with only one of the patches applied? Or do you expect the
patches to interact (so that the bug would only be present when both are
applied)?
Cheers,
Olaf
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Olaf Skibbe <news@kravcenko.com>
To: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux kernel regressions list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, 1042753@bugs.debian.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] nouveau bug in linux/6.1.38-2
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 14:46:54 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a5084b7-732b-6658-653e-7ece4c0768c9@kravcenko.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACO55ttcUEUjdVgx4y7pv26VAGeHS5q1wVKWrMw5=o9QLaJLZw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 14:15, Karol Herbst wrote:
> mind retrying with only fb725beca62d and 62aecf23f3d1 reverted?
I will do this later this day (takes some time, it is a slow machine).
> Would be weird if the other two commits are causing it. If that's the
> case, it's a bit worrying that reverting either of the those causes
> issues, but maybe there is a good reason for it. Anyway, mind figuring
> out which of the two you need reverted to fix your issue? Thanks!
I can do this. But if I build two kernels anyway, isn't it faster to
build each with only one of the patches applied? Or do you expect the
patches to interact (so that the bug would only be present when both are
applied)?
Cheers,
Olaf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-02 21:28 nouveau bug in linux/6.1.38-2 Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-02 21:28 ` [Nouveau] " Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-04 12:02 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-08-04 12:02 ` [Nouveau] " Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-08-04 12:02 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-08-04 12:15 ` Karol Herbst
2023-08-04 12:15 ` Karol Herbst
2023-08-04 12:15 ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2023-08-04 12:46 ` Olaf Skibbe [this message]
2023-08-04 12:46 ` Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-04 12:46 ` Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-04 12:51 ` Karol Herbst
2023-08-04 12:51 ` Karol Herbst
2023-08-04 12:51 ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2023-08-04 13:11 ` Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-04 13:11 ` [Nouveau] " Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-04 13:11 ` Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-04 13:38 ` Bug#1042753: " Diederik de Haas
2023-08-04 13:38 ` [Nouveau] " Diederik de Haas
2023-08-04 13:38 ` Diederik de Haas
2023-08-04 18:08 ` Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-04 18:08 ` [Nouveau] " Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-04 18:08 ` Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-04 23:09 ` Karol Herbst
2023-08-04 23:09 ` Karol Herbst
2023-08-04 23:09 ` [Nouveau] " Karol Herbst
2023-08-05 9:44 ` Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-05 9:44 ` [Nouveau] " Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-05 9:44 ` Olaf Skibbe
2023-08-31 9:40 ` [Nouveau] " Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2023-08-31 9:40 ` Linux regression tracking #update (Thorsten Leemhuis)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a5084b7-732b-6658-653e-7ece4c0768c9@kravcenko.com \
--to=news@kravcenko.com \
--cc=1042753@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.