olddoc user/dev discussion/patches/bugs/etc
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
To: Daniel Ferreira <subtileos@gmail.com>
Cc: olddoc-public@80x24.org, ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] olddoc 1.4.0 - old-fashioned RDoc generator
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:19:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170124231913.GA29936@whir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPL_2g25ir4ZBJo652ao1EYB59ZvFHhpGef1V14QOV2SeVXLeA@mail.gmail.com>

Daniel Ferreira <subtileos@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> I'm removing the documentation at each generation.
> 
> Replication steps:
> 
> 1. `$ rdoc`
> 2. `gem install olddoc`
> 3. `$ rm -rf doc`
> 4. `$ rdoc` # => Style has changed

Thanks. I was able to reproduce the problem and come up with
a patch below which seems to fix the problem:

----------------8<---------------
Subject: [PATCH] oldweb: apply LessHtml monkey patch late, at runtime

RDoc will load oldweb.rb regardless of whether it is used or
not, so do not apply our monkey patching to reduce HTML
generated by RDoc::Markup::ToHtml until we initialize Oldweb.

Thanks to Daniel Ferreira for noticing this in [ruby-talk:437390]:
  http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/437390
  <CAPL_2g25ir4ZBJo652ao1EYB59ZvFHhpGef1V14QOV2SeVXLeA@mail.gmail.com>

This still assumes any Ruby VM instance (currently synonymous
with an OS process in Ruby 2.4) will only use one RDoc template
in its lifetime and not switch between them.  More work will be
required to support switching between `oldweb' and other
templates within the same VM instance, but that's not a priority
for me.
---
 lib/oldweb.rb | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/oldweb.rb b/lib/oldweb.rb
index a5da1cc..95b7171 100644
--- a/lib/oldweb.rb
+++ b/lib/oldweb.rb
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ class Oldweb
     RDoc::Text::TO_HTML_CHARACTERS[Encoding::UTF_8] =
       RDoc::Text::TO_HTML_CHARACTERS[Encoding::ASCII]
 
+    less_html!
+
     @store = store
     @options = options
     @base_dir = Pathname.pwd.expand_path
@@ -298,12 +300,13 @@ class Oldweb
       @res << "</h#{level}>"
     end
   end
-end
 
-# :stopdoc:
-class RDoc::Markup::ToHtml # :nodoc:
-  remove_method :accept_heading
-  remove_method :accept_verbatim
-  include Oldweb::LessHtml
+  def less_html! # :nodoc:
+    klass = RDoc::Markup::ToHtml
+    return if klass.include?(Oldweb::LessHtml)
+    klass.__send__(:remove_method, :accept_heading)
+    klass.__send__(:remove_method, :accept_verbatim)
+    klass.__send__(:include, Oldweb::LessHtml)
+  end
 end
 # :startdoc:
---

> > I'm not sure what you mean by suffix, though.
> 
> Suffix would be:
> 
> `$ rdoc -f olddoc-light`
> `$ rdoc -f olddoc-dark`

Yeah, you're missing the point as Ryan alluded to in [ruby-talk:437398]
<8A8AAC2B-1615-4B26-939D-B118495F1BCF@zenspider.com>

I do not believe people should choose colors or fonts for other
people, only themselves.  I consider user interface elements
such as colors and fonts a personal preference for each and
every individual.  oldweb tries to get out-of-the-way as much as
possible.

So yeah, "light" and "dark" don't make sense for a webmaster or
designer to decide, and some mainstream browsers even have
plugins to support per-site color schemes via CSS.

> `$ rdoc -f olddoc-modern`

LOL

> Using `oldweb` demands extra overhead which in this case is avoidable IMO.

*shrug*  Naming things is one of the most difficult subjects
in computer science :)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-24 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-22 21:54 [ANN] olddoc 1.4.0 - old-fashioned RDoc generator Eric Wong
     [not found] ` <CAPL_2g2MtXeagzUN65ZaLxM+v7+QqkhJp-oN5t+RJNOG659Qsg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-01-23 12:50   ` Eric Wong
     [not found]     ` <CAPL_2g2gTQrosUyrLQPARMEqnZ4=q_+OZ2+hdVFkNXGtf9A2Nw@mail.gmail.com>
2017-01-23 15:01       ` Eric Wong
     [not found]         ` <CAPL_2g25ir4ZBJo652ao1EYB59ZvFHhpGef1V14QOV2SeVXLeA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-01-24 23:19           ` Eric Wong [this message]
     [not found]             ` <CAPL_2g0K8aWFB2g43NjSeaxLfbCRhf_ZrynTVa3YjjraaALMjg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-02-01 17:54               ` Eric Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://80x24.org/olddoc/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170124231913.GA29936@whir \
    --to=e@80x24.org \
    --cc=olddoc-public@80x24.org \
    --cc=ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org \
    --cc=subtileos@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/olddoc.git/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).