From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sam.saffron@gmail.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from mail-vs1-xe31.google.com (mail-vs1-xe31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e31])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C9621F4BD
	for <mwrap-public@80x24.org>; Tue,  8 Oct 2019 22:52:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe31.google.com with SMTP id p13so263234vso.0
        for <mwrap-public@80x24.org>; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 15:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=TrxsEIGbvJ6JBDE4+ide/tYyAHQQs9rkWOrTFURaqWA=;
        b=lN2Bbx6Is2SCa/4svmv0dBKQS2cryIueSwVUjXyYBnOyPwOqVQ+DfXAv57ufUChvmd
         ixm77MekzCaGJGnUjLvJ+0dPms7zXnJBlqmNgCOcYVB6g1eEb41EiJXhcWMXu+aita8E
         Wq1bv8zi4wDQ9Nk3GPtflGRzTuecyp5F4l8vZa+vXOYbe34pkcAKZxanxdRHRSPJJ34R
         AYh+tKTNjl/hoaTwsoI5A4cSDXZAXm85HFs5/wGjKRLJVzJF39aVMjfzVJTLO3ENfPB0
         uqpRO1ZxnLX51y2hQ7qWQnP1VqjG1mXIg/SFAWEV0us3D6L+KM1kTeB3z3wpZnExz42i
         V2RA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=TrxsEIGbvJ6JBDE4+ide/tYyAHQQs9rkWOrTFURaqWA=;
        b=Jkl4+DKvjqjrgr1nNDYtt/OsHoXwUspvbLrt2Dk8TY2odjViE4htYx7NkXQARk3TuG
         PH00dtxmS9woD5r6sBC/AybyJ/qKSWlYcZT758VVsshHzlmEWEWxOgJU4fRhWplnTjd/
         K6ejd1dTPr7ZBYdm0Gao5x4FSL0zUn/oOhurojJo8gInNdtxRuNs5EnMZ5TDQjjmmvM1
         /WGgR18TgsbtsxiTxxZnVWLpqDNLVUTYzPdPJ/qa/iCywtdAr1nHH4mdTdTaofmNGgLA
         o6B4bradGbWnA5DMcqV9xj0Op3rxM6JtJkw1NHr78bp7bI8Elw4W01r8SC2y43khHu5h
         n2vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWh0eGmqBzQhRClrbFp9pKI2LVo9MdV6MNYakQxbrRyPvjpLdgm
	upuDsd9GSw7W500CJo7q26Z0/czDbHpLknLPNhlrJjuw
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyxBBUhHLQjXAjnE8UysVoqYtF60ms0VrbWhHPSYJTlwufrnAiiFGxXZZ5vavQh10UxLMm/O+CL4SDRbTd6KpA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:52b:: with SMTP id m11mr134033vsa.162.1570575154483;
 Tue, 08 Oct 2019 15:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Sam Saffron <sam.saffron@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 09:52:22 +1100
Message-ID: <CAAtdryPc3bZ6Ufr=iu41SQd+b7T2WH6Hek0cvYy2GUbpK4hAHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: extend mwrap dump to include frees/allocations
To: mwrap-public@80x24.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-Id: <mwrap-public.80x24.org>

(allocations-frees) * (total_allocated / allocations) is a reasonable
estimate for leak per call site.

Currently mwrap dump does not include this info, I was thinking we
default sort this down by estimated leak size and included the missing
bits on info into the dump report?