($INBOX_DIR/description missing)
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com
To: docs@lists.yoctoproject.org
Cc: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
Subject: [PATCH] dev-manual: packages: clarify shared PR service constraint
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 22:16:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240221211648.104003-1-michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com> (raw)

From: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>

Explicit the problems previous described as "obvious".

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com>
---
 documentation/dev-manual/packages.rst | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/documentation/dev-manual/packages.rst b/documentation/dev-manual/packages.rst
index 0e991e409a..d90ff7110e 100644
--- a/documentation/dev-manual/packages.rst
+++ b/documentation/dev-manual/packages.rst
@@ -205,9 +205,14 @@ history, see the
    The OpenEmbedded build system does not maintain :term:`PR` information as
    part of the shared state (sstate) packages. If you maintain an sstate
    feed, it's expected that either all your building systems that
-   contribute to the sstate feed use a shared PR Service, or you do not
-   run a PR Service on any of your building systems. Having some systems
-   use a PR Service while others do not leads to obvious problems.
+   contribute to the sstate feed use a shared PR service, or you do not
+   run a PR Service on any of your building systems.
+
+   That's because if you had multiple machines sharing a PR service but
+   not their sstate feed, you could end up with "diverging" hashes for
+   the same output artefacts. When presented to the share PR service,
+   each would be considered as new and would increase the revision
+   number, causing many unnecessary package upgrades.
 
    For more information on shared state, see the
    ":ref:`overview-manual/concepts:shared state cache`"
-- 
2.34.1



             reply	other threads:[~2024-02-21 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 21:16 michael.opdenacker [this message]
2024-03-04 11:19 ` [docs] [PATCH] dev-manual: packages: clarify shared PR service constraint Quentin Schulz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240221211648.104003-1-michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com \
    --to=michael.opdenacker@bootlin.com \
    --cc=docs@lists.yoctoproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).