xenomai.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@sigma-star.at>,
	Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>,
	Xenomai <xenomai@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: dovetail: Permit to declare a trap handled
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 13:59:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc20fdf7-0bf7-43cb-8ff2-6a8dd261f879@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFLxGvy0dQtnfjsgvAyv=8m4JubED7UTwdcvF_8eTkBc5+i+iQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 28.03.24 08:28, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Jan,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 5:12 PM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
>>>> Yes, I do have some first hacks here as well. ARM and ARM64 is not yet
>>>> ready for this, unfortunately.
>>>
>>> Can you please share your hacks?
>>> What is missing? I'll happily continue your work.
>>>
>>
>> Just refreshed [1], and the kernel side hacks are attached (mixture of
>> Johannes and my WIP changes). Blocker is really the level of kernel
>> enabling we need/want for non-x86. Those changes can be many. Also a
>> problem is the information forwarding from the exception handler to the
>> oob callback - missing in many cases, see also the dances needed in
>> xnarch_setup_trap_info().
> 
> In commit 7e13c6997 ("rt-signal: kernel refactorings") I see the
> following change:
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cobalt/dovetail/kevents.c b/kernel/cobalt/dovetail/kevents.c
> index 5394c85d0..275a9f726 100644
> --- a/kernel/cobalt/dovetail/kevents.c
> +++ b/kernel/cobalt/dovetail/kevents.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ void handle_oob_trap_entry(unsigned int trapnr,
> struct pt_regs *regs)
>                xnsched_run();
>        }
> 
> -       if (xnthread_handle_rt_signals(trapnr, regs) == 0)
> +       if (xnthread_test_state(thread, XNUSER) &&
> +           xnthread_handle_rt_signals(trapnr, regs))
>                return;
> 
>        /*
> 
> I guess the idea behind is making sure we handle only faults from user mode.
> But isn't XNUSER also present if a thread is executing a cobalt syscall?
> So, I think instead of just testing for XNUSER we need to check using
> user_mode(regs) too.
> 
> What do you think?
> 

I think the idea was to exclude kernel threads, but I'm not 100% sure
anymore. I agree that testing for user_mode should have that effect as
well and exclude kernel oopses - if we don't filter them elsewhere already.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Technology
Linux Expert Center


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-08  7:11 [RFC][PATCH] x86: dovetail: Permit to declare a trap handled Jan Kiszka
2022-07-08  7:12 ` Jan Kiszka
2022-11-09  7:31   ` Johannes Kirchmair
2022-11-09  9:28     ` Jan Kiszka
2022-11-09 10:06       ` Philippe Gerum
2022-11-09 10:38         ` Jan Kiszka
2022-11-09 11:42           ` Johannes Kirchmair
2022-11-10  9:00             ` Philippe Gerum
2024-02-12 15:04               ` Richard Weinberger
2024-02-12 15:12                 ` Jan Kiszka
2024-02-12 15:14                   ` Richard Weinberger
2024-02-12 16:12                     ` Jan Kiszka
2024-03-28  7:28                       ` Richard Weinberger
2024-04-08 11:59                         ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2022-11-09  7:36 ` Johannes Kirchmair
2022-11-09  9:29   ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc20fdf7-0bf7-43cb-8ff2-6a8dd261f879@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@sigma-star.at \
    --cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
    --cc=xenomai@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).