From: Federico Parola <federico.parola@polito.it>
To: xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Why choosing AF_XDP (busy polling) over DPDK
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:08:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c094424-4ace-86a3-ffc9-0142b62b7d27@polito.it> (raw)
Hello everyone,
in a context in which all traffic is sent to user space, and the main
concern is performance (so AF_XDP busy polling is the best candidate),
is there a reason to choose AF_XDP instead of DPDK for packet I/O, given
that the latter is still much faster?
Best regards,
Federico Parola
next reply other threads:[~2022-12-14 8:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-14 8:08 Federico Parola [this message]
2022-12-14 9:00 ` Why choosing AF_XDP (busy polling) over DPDK Magnus Karlsson
2022-12-14 15:16 ` Federico Parola
2022-12-14 15:31 ` Magnus Karlsson
2022-12-19 7:41 ` Federico Parola
2022-12-14 19:46 ` Andrey Slastenov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c094424-4ace-86a3-ffc9-0142b62b7d27@polito.it \
--to=federico.parola@polito.it \
--cc=xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).