Virtualization Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	"Joel Granados" <j.granados@samsung.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/9] iommufd: Add iommufd fault object
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 07:57:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BN9PR11MB5276F21755C883FE7EC784228CEC2@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a03d3bf6-0610-427c-bf2a-5f6c410e220e@linux.intel.com>

> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2024 6:05 PM
> 
> On 2024/5/8 8:11, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 10:57:06PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h b/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h
> >> index ae65e0b85d69..1a0450a83bd0 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-priv.h
> >> @@ -36,6 +36,10 @@ struct iommu_attach_handle {
> >>   			struct device	*dev;
> >>   			refcount_t	users;
> >>   		};
> >> +		/* attach data for IOMMUFD */
> >> +		struct {
> >> +			void		*idev;
> >> +		};
> > We can use a proper type here, just forward declare it.
> >
> > But this sequence in the other patch:
> >
> > +       ret = iommu_attach_group(hwpt->domain, idev->igroup->group);
> > +       if (ret) {
> > +               iommufd_fault_iopf_disable(idev);
> > +               return ret;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       handle = iommu_attach_handle_get(idev->igroup->group,
> IOMMU_NO_PASID, 0);
> > +       handle->idev = idev;
> >
> > Is why I was imagining the caller would allocate, because now we have
> > the issue that a fault capable domain was installed into the IOMMU
> > before it's handle could be fully setup, so we have a race where a
> > fault could come in right between those things. Then what happens?
> > I suppose we can retry the fault and by the time it comes back the
> > race should resolve. A bit ugly I suppose.
> 
> You are right. It makes more sense if the attached data is allocated and
> managed by the caller. I will go in this direction and update my series.
> I will also consider other review comments you have given in other
> places.
> 

Does this direction imply a new iommu_attach_group_handle() helper
to pass in the caller-allocated handle pointer or exposing a new
iommu_group_set_handle() to set the handle to the group pasid_array 
and then having iomm_attach_group() to update the domain info in
the handle?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-15  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-30 14:57 [PATCH v5 0/9] IOMMUFD: Deliver IO page faults to user space Lu Baolu
2024-04-30 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] iommu: Introduce domain attachment handle Lu Baolu
2024-05-15  7:17   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-19 10:07     ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-30 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] iommu: Replace sva_iommu with iommu_attach_handle Lu Baolu
2024-05-07 23:58   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-15  7:21   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-19 10:14     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-20  3:18       ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-30 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] iommu: Add attachment handle to struct iopf_group Lu Baolu
2024-05-08  0:04   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-10  3:14     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-10 13:38       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-10 14:30         ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-10 16:28           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-15  7:28             ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-15  7:31   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-19 14:03     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-20  3:20       ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-30 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] iommufd: Add fault and response message definitions Lu Baolu
2024-05-15  7:43   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-19 14:37     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-20  3:24       ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-20  3:33         ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-20  4:59           ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-24 14:15             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-27  1:27               ` Tian, Kevin
2024-04-30 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] iommufd: Add iommufd fault object Lu Baolu
2024-05-08  0:11   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-08 10:05     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-15  7:57       ` Tian, Kevin [this message]
2024-05-20  0:41         ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-20  3:26           ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-20  3:28             ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-08  0:22   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-10  9:13     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-15  8:37   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-20  1:15     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-20  1:24     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-24 14:16       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-20  1:33     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-20  3:33       ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-20  1:38     ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-30 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] iommufd: Fault-capable hwpt attach/detach/replace Lu Baolu
2024-05-08  0:18   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-10  3:20     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-10 13:39       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-15  8:43   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-20  2:10     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-20  3:35       ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-20  3:55         ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-30 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] iommufd: Associate fault object with iommufd_hw_pgtable Lu Baolu
2024-05-08  0:25   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-10  3:23     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-15  8:50   ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-20  2:18     ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-20  3:39       ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-20  4:00         ` Baolu Lu
2024-05-24 14:24         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-05-27  1:33           ` Tian, Kevin
2024-05-27  3:16             ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-30 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] iommufd/selftest: Add IOPF support for mock device Lu Baolu
2024-04-30 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for IOPF test Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BN9PR11MB5276F21755C883FE7EC784228CEC2@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).