trinity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: trinity@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] update perf_event_open() for Linux 3.19
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 15:46:32 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150204204632.GA2551@codemonkey.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1502041538420.5222@vincent-weaver-1.umelst.maine.edu>

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:41:17PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
 > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Dave Jones wrote:
 > 
 > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 12:01:23PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
 > > 
 > > 
 > >  > @@ -237,6 +238,7 @@ enum perf_event_read_format {
 > >  >  #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER2	80	/* add: branch_sample_type */
 > >  >  #define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER3	96	/* add: sample_regs_user */
 > >  >  					/* add: sample_stack_user */
 > >  > +#define PERF_ATTR_SIZE_VER4	104	/* add: sample_regs_intr */
 > > 
 > > I've not given this a lot of thought before, but I'm assuming these
 > > are the 64-bit struct sizes.  It might be interesting to also
 > > throw some 32-bit sizes in the mix.  Who knows what horrors
 > > lie in wait for the compat syscalls.
 > 
 > I might be misunderstanding, but I think the attr structure is defined in 
 > a way that it has the same size on 32 and 64 bit.

ah, ok. Yeah, now that I look at the struct definition, it's all
u32/u64's, so this is the same size on both archs.

	Dave

      reply	other threads:[~2015-02-04 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-03 17:01 [patch] update perf_event_open() for Linux 3.19 Vince Weaver
2015-02-04 20:31 ` Dave Jones
2015-02-04 20:41   ` Vince Weaver
2015-02-04 20:46     ` Dave Jones [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150204204632.GA2551@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=trinity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).