From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: "Shaikh, Azhar" <azhar.shaikh@intel.com>
Cc: "jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com"
<jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
"javierm@redhat.com" <javierm@redhat.com>,
"peterhuewe@gmx.de" <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Fix the driver cleanup code
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:30:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171221223049.GJ20015@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FFFAD06ADE1CA4381B3F0F7C6AF582898918B@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 09:54:26PM +0000, Shaikh, Azhar wrote:
> Yes, I checked this part. What I was referring to is any other
> callback function similar to clk_enable if gets added in future and
> then needs to Access ops even after it is set to NULL...
You can't call callback functions after tpm_unregister_chip, it isn't
allowed.
This is a special case where we know the specific implementation of
this specific callback is OK.
> But yes I get your point now.
>
> So do you mean something like this?
Yes
Jason
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-21 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-21 20:17 [PATCH] tpm: Fix the driver cleanup code Azhar Shaikh
2017-12-21 20:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-12-21 20:31 ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-12-21 20:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-12-21 21:54 ` Shaikh, Azhar
2017-12-21 22:30 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171221223049.GJ20015@ziepe.ca \
--to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=azhar.shaikh@intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).