Linux maintainer tooling and workflows
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Konstantin Ryabitsev" <konstantin.ryabitsev@linux.dev>
To: "Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>, "Uros Bizjak" <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tools@linux.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hyperv: Use atomic_try_cmpxchg() to micro-optimize hv_nmi_unknown()
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 16:52:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddeefd4d0323df0948565fea2ffb55793fdcc8dc@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZV163ePuUQyyeKUj@liuwe-devbox-debian-v2>

November 21, 2023 at 10:51 PM, "Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org> wrote:
> Uros, just so you know, DKIM verification failed when I used b4 to apply
> this patch. You may want to check your email setup.

This is not actually Uros's fault. Recently, Gmail started adding a forced expiration field to their DKIM signatures, via the x= field:

    DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699981249; x=1700586049; darn=vger.kernel.org;
                                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This gives the signature an enforced validity of only 7 days. Since the original message was sent on November 14 and you're retrieving it on November 21, this causes the DKIM check to fail.

I need to figure out how to make b4 ignore the x= field, because it's not relevant for our purposes, but the library we're using for DKIM doesn't currently have any mechanism to do so. I will open an RFE with them in the hopes that we can get this implemented.

Regards,
-K

           reply	other threads:[~2023-11-22 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <CAFULd4Z3DZh0SoEyNHfz3=DM2CkDGtNP_f1gVx64NJkzmWp-Pw@mail.gmail.com>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ddeefd4d0323df0948565fea2ffb55793fdcc8dc@linux.dev \
    --to=konstantin.ryabitsev@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tools@linux.kernel.org \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).