Regressions List Tracking
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
	Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: gcc-8: arm64/kvm/pauth.: Error: unknown architectural extension `pauth'
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:58:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v849t373.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZiYqV-5BWmPwgqbU@FVFF77S0Q05N>

On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:13:59 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 02:04:43PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > The arm64 defconfig build failed with gcc-8 and passed with gcc-13.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Build log:
> > ---
> > /tmp/ccSUNNZy.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/ccSUNNZy.s:3159: Error: unknown architectural extension `pauth'
> > make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:244: arch/arm64/kvm/pauth.o] Error 1
> > 
> > Steps to reproduce:
> > ---
> > # tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch arm64 --toolchain gcc-8
> > --kconfig defconfig
> 
> I think the key thing here is GCC 8; the associated assembler won't necessarily
> have ARMv8.3-A support, since all the relevant bits got added around GCC 9.
> 
> Looking at the commits, I think this is broken since its introduction in commit:
> 
>   6ccc971ee2c61a1f  ("KVM: arm64: nv: Add emulation for ERETAx instructions")
> 
> ... where the pauth.c file only depends on ARM64_PTR_AUTH (which doesn't imply
> AS_HAS_ARMV8_3), but in the file we do:
> 
>   asm volatile(ARM64_ASM_PREAMBLE ".arch_extension pauth\n"
>                "pacga %0, %1, %2" : "=r" (pac) : "r" (ptr), "r" (mod));
> 
> Given the minimum supported toolchain comes with an assembler that doesn't
> necessarily support ARMv8.3, I reckon we'll either have to make NV pauth
> support depend upon AS_HAS_ARMV8_3, or manually assemble the PACGA instruction.
> 
> I suspect the latter is the better option.

This is what I've done [1]. It certainly isn't pretty, but this counts
as an incentive to drop some of the old stuff in the near-ish future.

I've pushed this out to -next, and hopefully the breakage will be
solved tomorrow.

	M.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240422224849.2238222-1-maz@kernel.org

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-22 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-22  8:34 gcc-8: arm64/kvm/pauth.: Error: unknown architectural extension `pauth' Naresh Kamboju
2024-04-22  9:13 ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-22  9:25   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-22  9:40     ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-22 12:11       ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-22 17:20         ` Mark Rutland
2024-04-22 18:44           ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-04-22 22:58   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v849t373.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).