RCU Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v2 10/11] rcu: Add atomic write enforcement for rcu stalls
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 17:00:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZRRDiAUJMHAgiDnD@alley> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230919230856.661435-11-john.ogness@linutronix.de>

On Wed 2023-09-20 01:14:55, John Ogness wrote:
> Invoke the atomic write enforcement functions for rcu stalls to
> ensure that the information gets out to the consoles.
> 
> It is important to note that if there are any legacy consoles
> registered, they will be attempting to directly print from the
> printk-caller context, which may jeopardize the reliability of
> the atomic consoles. Optimally there should be no legacy
> consoles registered.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> index 6f06dc12904a..0a58f8b233d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/kvm_para.h>
> +#include <linux/console.h>
>  
>  //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>  //
> @@ -582,6 +583,7 @@ static void rcu_check_gp_kthread_expired_fqs_timer(void)
>  
>  static void print_other_cpu_stall(unsigned long gp_seq, unsigned long gps)
>  {
> +	enum nbcon_prio prev_prio;
>  	int cpu;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	unsigned long gpa;
> @@ -597,6 +599,8 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(unsigned long gp_seq, unsigned long gps)
>  	if (rcu_stall_is_suppressed())
>  		return;
>  
> +	prev_prio = nbcon_atomic_enter(NBCON_PRIO_EMERGENCY);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * OK, time to rat on our buddy...
>  	 * See Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst for info on how to debug
> @@ -651,6 +655,8 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(unsigned long gp_seq, unsigned long gps)
>  	panic_on_rcu_stall();
>  
>  	rcu_force_quiescent_state();  /* Kick them all. */
> +
> +	nbcon_atomic_exit(NBCON_PRIO_EMERGENCY, prev_prio);

The locations looks reasonable to me. I just hope that we would
use another API: nbcon_emergency_enter()/exit() in the end.

Note that the new API it would allow to flush the messages in
the emergency context immediately from printk().

In that case, we would to handle nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace()
some special way.

This function would be called from the emergency context but
the nmi_cpu_backtrace() callbacks would be called on other
CPUs in normal context.

For this case I would add something like:

void nbcon_flush_all_emergency(void)
{
	emum nbcon_prio = nbcon_get_default_prio();

	if (nbcon_prio >= NBCON_PRIO_EMERGENCY)
		nbcon_flush_all();
}

, where the POC of nbcon_get_default_prio() and nbcon_flush_all()
was in the replay to the 7th patch, see
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZRLBxsXPCym2NC5Q@alley/


Best Regards,
Petr

      reply	other threads:[~2023-09-27 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-19 23:08 [PATCH printk v2 00/11] wire up nbcon atomic printing John Ogness
2023-09-19 23:08 ` [PATCH printk v2 10/11] rcu: Add atomic write enforcement for rcu stalls John Ogness
2023-09-27 15:00   ` Petr Mladek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZRRDiAUJMHAgiDnD@alley \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).