RadioTap Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: radiotap-S783fYmB3Ccdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-wireless
	<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [Query] Decryption and Monitor Mode
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 01:22:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABPxzY++gCivs1u8nDtAeB5=p+ZkGHXmOnqud1hkh=TWB5Xprg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

In our internal tests we make use of monitor mode heavily for all the
debugging, especially with security related issues (as packets are
already decrypted).

But as the decryption is done in HW (most cases), the HW decrypts the
packet but still retains the Security Header and sends to the host (at
least in our solution), we remove that header while giving the packet
to network stack but while giving it to the monitor mode we do not
strip off that and also protection=1.

With this wireshark is not able to decode the packets, even thought
they are decrypted. I propose 2 solutions

Radiotap and Wireshark:

1) Add 2 flags to the radiotap RX Flags (HW Decrypted the packet,
Packet has security Header (for some chipsets which consume the
security header as well..??).)

Based on these the wireshark dissector decodes the packet accordingly.

mac80211:

2) Remove the security header information in the monitor path as well
based on the existing RX_FLAGS.


Solutions 2 looks more elegant and simple, any comments?

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Chaitanya T K.

             reply	other threads:[~2013-11-05 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-05 19:52 Krishna Chaitanya [this message]
     [not found] ` <CABPxzY++gCivs1u8nDtAeB5=p+ZkGHXmOnqud1hkh=TWB5Xprg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-06  7:59   ` [Query] Decryption and Monitor Mode Johannes Berg
     [not found] ` <1383724794.14307.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
     [not found]   ` <1383724794.14307.2.camel-8Nb76shvtaUJvtFkdXX2HixXY32XiHfO@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-06 10:15     ` Krishna Chaitanya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABPxzY++gCivs1u8nDtAeB5=p+ZkGHXmOnqud1hkh=TWB5Xprg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=chaitanya.mgit-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=radiotap-S783fYmB3Ccdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).