QEMU-Devel Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
To: "Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	Programmingkid <programmingkidx@gmail.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU devel list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	incoming+qemu-project-qemu-11167699-3xhw7c0pviow7og92yv73e0tr-issue-404@incoming.gitlab.com,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: tb_flush() calls causing long Windows XP boot times
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 09:59:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e809eeed-c635-c48c-c6b6-9c2d5718b60d@ilande.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d0b277d-415f-0f4e-3f09-03445f89848f@linaro.org>

On 16/06/2021 02:58, Richard Henderson wrote:

> On 6/15/21 6:58 AM, Programmingkid wrote:
>>> Ahh I misread - so those are the addresses of the routines and not where
>>> it's sticking the breakpoint?
>>>
>>> I notice from a bit of googling that there is a boot debugger. I wonder
>>> if /nodebug in boot.ini stops this behaviour?
>>>
>>>   
>>> https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/performance/switch-options-for-boot-files 
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Alex Bennée
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I tried your suggestion of using /nodebug. It did not stop the tb_flush() function 
>> from being called.
> 
> We are not expecting zero calls to tb_flush (it is used for other things, including 
> buffer full), but we are hoping that it reduces the frequency of the calls.
> 
> I'm guessing you didn't immediately see the slowdown vanish, and so there was no 
> change to the frequency of the calls.
> 
> FWIW, if you switch to the qemu console, you can see how many flushes have occurred 
> with "info jit".

Looking at the diff of b55f54bc96 which first introduced the regression, presumably 
the difference is now that everything is being flushed rather than a specific address 
space when WinXP twiddles with the DB7 register:


diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index 67e520d18e..7f4074f95e 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -1019,14 +1019,13 @@ void tb_invalidate_phys_addr(AddressSpace *as, hwaddr addr, 
MemTxAttrs attrs)

  static void breakpoint_invalidate(CPUState *cpu, target_ulong pc)
  {
-    MemTxAttrs attrs;
-    hwaddr phys = cpu_get_phys_page_attrs_debug(cpu, pc, &attrs);
-    int asidx = cpu_asidx_from_attrs(cpu, attrs);
-    if (phys != -1) {
-        /* Locks grabbed by tb_invalidate_phys_addr */
-        tb_invalidate_phys_addr(cpu->cpu_ases[asidx].as,
-                                phys | (pc & ~TARGET_PAGE_MASK), attrs);
-    }
+    /*
+     * There may not be a virtual to physical translation for the pc
+     * right now, but there may exist cached TB for this pc.
+     * Flush the whole TB cache to force re-translation of such TBs.
+     * This is heavyweight, but we're debugging anyway.
+     */
+    tb_flush(cpu);
  }
  #endif


Unfortunately my x86-fu isn't really enough to understand what the solution should be 
in this case.


ATB,

Mark.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-16  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-10 12:59 tb_flush() calls causing long Windows XP boot times Programmingkid
2021-06-10 13:14 ` Peter Maydell
2021-06-10 13:24   ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2021-06-11 11:24     ` Alex Bennée
2021-06-11 15:01       ` Programmingkid
2021-06-11 17:13         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-11 18:22           ` Alex Bennée
2021-06-13 14:03             ` Mark Cave-Ayland
2021-06-14 14:37               ` Alex Bennée
2021-06-15 13:58                 ` Programmingkid
2021-06-16  1:58                   ` Richard Henderson
2021-06-16  8:59                     ` Mark Cave-Ayland [this message]
2021-06-16 12:53                       ` Alex Bennée
2021-06-16 13:06                         ` Peter Maydell
2021-06-16 15:30                           ` Alex Bennée
2021-06-16 13:21                       ` Alex Bennée
2021-06-16 12:12                     ` Programmingkid
2021-06-10 13:38   ` Programmingkid
2021-06-14 22:19 ` no-reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e809eeed-c635-c48c-c6b6-9c2d5718b60d@ilande.co.uk \
    --to=mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=incoming+qemu-project-qemu-11167699-3xhw7c0pviow7og92yv73e0tr-issue-404@incoming.gitlab.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=programmingkidx@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).