From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58396C47094 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0096C61376 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:46:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0096C61376 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52630 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrL18-0000cO-59 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:46:42 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrKvG-0004cn-6j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:40:38 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:26908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lrKvC-0008Mv-1r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:40:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1623332433; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mbbrwV9Qwr8m0szI3eufiqo8Qihr9CJRbJ2okfyJiY0=; b=EvS5Nl8Z+oE+W/k/WiAxJr+WdVGWLTQdLPvzYquJFWzk3W25TCWD/ZiOyQ+/2qGi2zkBtK Nw/911FALinE41F3OD37q/NVbpMwD11dQOoPEiTtFiAUNRjBbDu4F8nfoqutmPp69ciZt3 K0l6ukgP7mq2DORiDMQzvBAGfKYK5v8= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-529-yBGK3skzPumb2bE2Xh8XCA-1; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 09:40:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yBGK3skzPumb2bE2Xh8XCA-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id e9-20020a5d6d090000b0290119e91be97dso924742wrq.1 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 06:40:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mbbrwV9Qwr8m0szI3eufiqo8Qihr9CJRbJ2okfyJiY0=; b=B/JQb/rVPWLXEW5Wx6vbCA+E3SgU2tRMSJEhevRZ7pGuGU/Yu2DAyB1bys4ZxoDEHP 0ut38gWNO0yjHpcPX3PzyP/BUCm5lZAZBO+QmmnmoWTTC5zyUH1qN70LjUPNTQ/6REPI UW2xbu5DlUxghnP2PbRxtlLJivWQw/v2i7kX8+7irrGFe3ctQ3dfOXONfW3QM2HUcTTD auSP4rcF5bCCg8NVigUSfk/tVJDHVLJeQ2oeLDnknlhzWG2YLYIvzEcw+pkoi3zeu+yw +htrtU3lTb4kS+o5ec3NQDId4Ckwoles9V2236q11xpC21AjO/CCZNvg0wGd6Y80xJWa s+Jw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530YR/b8b8y02u30irgNTnW7B+ohtrGHf2LJztEZzAWE6uGeVoXJ 1U3Mv3FfjRTWtS6EAYS0PfX94quMFpVMP5s2clqNvsjEBxq9mYCy4qXPr+9HBnALjeWAScU72lK VrS0ictGPCl+jK34= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1847:: with SMTP id c7mr5599482wri.368.1623332429087; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 06:40:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxgXRug6E3CdIevURcFBmUdzP6NHD0XfDhnkoVr/5u86e+EDpjr2oJMfScJ1IflxaKEhNinNg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1847:: with SMTP id c7mr5599465wri.368.1623332428936; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 06:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:63a7:c72e:ea0e:6045? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:63a7:c72e:ea0e:6045]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b15sm4391462wrr.27.2021.06.10.06.40.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 06:40:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] block: file-posix queue To: Maxim Levitsky , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20210603133722.218465-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 15:40:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.199, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 07/06/21 15:52, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > I used to have a patch series that was about to fix the block limits of the scsi-block, > which I think is similar to this patch series. > > Sorry that I kind of forgot about it for too much time. > > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg768261.html > > I'll need some time to swap-in this area so that I could compare our > patches to see if we missed something. They are indeed very similar; the only substantial change is that my patches also clamp max_hw_transfer to max_transfer. I picked up patch 5 from your old submission and queued it, since it's a SCSI change. Paolo