From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: "Eduardo Habkost" <eduardo@habkost.net>,
"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
"Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Marcelo Tosatti" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
Zhuocheng Ding <zhuocheng.ding@intel.com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>, Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 17/21] tests: Add test case of APIC ID for module level parsing
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 23:49:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240424154929.1487382-18-zhao1.liu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240424154929.1487382-1-zhao1.liu@intel.com>
From: Zhuocheng Ding <zhuocheng.ding@intel.com>
After i386 supports module level, it's time to add the test for module
level's parsing.
Signed-off-by: Zhuocheng Ding <zhuocheng.ding@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c
index f21b8a5d95c2..55b731ccae55 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-x86-topo.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void)
topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1};
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 0);
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 0);
+ g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 0);
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0);
topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 1, 1};
@@ -74,13 +75,22 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void)
topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 33, 2};
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_width(&topo_info), ==, 6);
- topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 30, 2};
+ topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2};
+ g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3);
+ topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 7, 30, 2};
+ g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3);
+ topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 8, 30, 2};
+ g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 3);
+ topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 9, 30, 2};
+ g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_width(&topo_info), ==, 4);
+
+ topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 6, 30, 2};
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 0);
- topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 1, 30, 2};
+ topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {2, 6, 30, 2};
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 1);
- topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 1, 30, 2};
+ topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {3, 6, 30, 2};
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2);
- topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 1, 30, 2};
+ topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {4, 6, 30, 2};
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_width(&topo_info), ==, 2);
/* build a weird topology and see if IDs are calculated correctly
@@ -91,6 +101,7 @@ static void test_topo_bits(void)
topo_info = (X86CPUTopoInfo) {1, 1, 6, 3};
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_smt_width(&topo_info), ==, 2);
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_core_offset(&topo_info), ==, 2);
+ g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_module_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5);
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_die_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5);
g_assert_cmpuint(apicid_pkg_offset(&topo_info), ==, 5);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-24 15:49 [PATCH v11 00/21] i386: Introduce smp.modules and clean up cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 01/21] hw/core/machine: Introduce the module as a CPU topology level Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 02/21] hw/core/machine: Support modules in -smp Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 03/21] hw/core: Introduce module-id as the topology subindex Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 04/21] hw/core: Support module-id in numa configuration Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 05/21] i386/cpu: Fix i/d-cache topology to core level for Intel CPU Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 06/21] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID info to encode cache topo in CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 07/21] i386/cpu: Use APIC ID info get NumSharingCache for CPUID[0x8000001D].EAX[bits 25:14] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 08/21] i386/cpu: Consolidate the use of topo_info in cpu_x86_cpuid() Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 09/21] i386/cpu: Introduce bitmap to cache available CPU topology levels Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 10/21] i386: Split topology types of CPUID[0x1F] from the definitions of CPUID[0xB] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 11/21] i386/cpu: Decouple CPUID[0x1F] subleaf with specific topology level Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 12/21] i386: Introduce module level cpu topology to CPUX86State Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 13/21] i386: Support modules_per_die in X86CPUTopoInfo Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 14/21] i386: Expose module level in CPUID[0x1F] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 15/21] i386: Support module_id in X86CPUTopoIDs Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 16/21] i386/cpu: Introduce module-id to X86CPU Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 18/21] hw/i386/pc: Support smp.modules for x86 PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 19/21] i386: Add cache topology info in CPUCacheInfo Zhao Liu
2024-04-30 6:14 ` Tejus GK
2024-05-06 7:32 ` Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 20/21] i386/cpu: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode CPUID[4] Zhao Liu
2024-04-24 15:49 ` [PATCH v11 21/21] i386/cpu: Use CPUCacheInfo.share_level to encode CPUID[0x8000001D].EAX[bits 25:14] Zhao Liu
2024-04-25 8:06 ` [PATCH v11 00/21] i386: Introduce smp.modules and clean up cache topology Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2024-04-25 13:30 ` Zhao Liu
2024-05-15 14:48 ` Zhao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240424154929.1487382-18-zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=eduardo@habkost.net \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yongwei.ma@intel.com \
--cc=zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com \
--cc=zhuocheng.ding@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).