From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
<linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>, <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>,
<ying.huang@intel.com>, <feng.tang@intel.com>,
<fengwei.yin@intel.com>, <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [linus:master] [smb] 55c7788c37: filebench.sum_operations/s -5.8% regression
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 10:07:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202402220939.82e05c80-oliver.sang@intel.com> (raw)
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a -5.8% regression of filebench.sum_operations/s on:
commit: 55c7788c37242702868bfac7861cdf0c358d6c3d ("smb: client: set correct d_type for reparse points under DFS mounts")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
testcase: filebench
test machine: 128 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8358 CPU @ 2.60GHz (Ice Lake) with 128G memory
parameters:
disk: 1HDD
fs: xfs
fs2: cifs
test: listdirs.f
cpufreq_governor: performance
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202402220939.82e05c80-oliver.sang@intel.com
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240222/202402220939.82e05c80-oliver.sang@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs2/fs/kconfig/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-12/performance/1HDD/cifs/xfs/x86_64-rhel-8.3/debian-11.1-x86_64-20220510.cgz/lkp-icl-2sp6/listdirs.f/filebench
commit:
45be0882c5 ("smb3: add missing null server pointer check")
55c7788c37 ("smb: client: set correct d_type for reparse points under DFS mounts")
45be0882c5f91e1b 55c7788c37242702868bfac7861
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
2.52 -0.1 2.42 turbostat.C1E%
37127 -4.2% 35586 vmstat.system.cs
37311 -4.3% 35707 perf-stat.i.context-switches
37139 -4.3% 35545 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
883301 -1.0% 874098 proc-vmstat.numa_local
2284791 -2.7% 2222575 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
2193531 -2.7% 2135398 proc-vmstat.pgfree
9.95 -5.6% 9.39 filebench.sum_bytes_mb/s
294200 -5.8% 277276 filebench.sum_operations
4903 -5.8% 4620 filebench.sum_operations/s
3.26 +6.1% 3.45 filebench.sum_time_ms/op
1685851 -5.0% 1601112 filebench.time.voluntary_context_switches
0.00 +0.7 0.68 ± 19% perf-profile.calltrace.cycles-pp.listxattr
0.00 +0.1 0.08 ± 27% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.strcasecmp_m_handle
0.00 +0.1 0.08 ± 33% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.next_codepoint_handle
0.11 ± 31% +0.1 0.20 ± 25% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.next_codepoint_handle_ext
0.00 +0.1 0.11 ± 29% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.xfs_attr_list
0.00 +0.1 0.13 ± 27% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.xfs_vn_listxattr
0.93 ± 20% +0.5 1.40 ± 16% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.user_path_at_empty
0.00 +0.6 0.63 ± 21% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.path_listxattr
0.01 ±212% +0.9 0.90 ± 21% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.listxattr
0.10 ± 31% +0.1 0.17 ± 27% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.next_codepoint_handle_ext
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2024-02-22 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202402220939.82e05c80-oliver.sang@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.com \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).