Nouveau Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
To: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>,
	kherbst@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com, dakr@redhat.com,
	airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] driver: gpu: Fixing warning directly dereferencing a rcu pointer
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:24:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f229d1ed-b71e-434a-acca-06ee81826260@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231113081040.2947143-1-singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>

Hey,

Den 2023-11-13 kl. 09:10, skrev Abhinav Singh:
> This patch fixes a sparse warning with this message
> "warning:dereference of noderef expression". In this context it means we
> are dereferencing a __rcu tagged pointer directly.
>
> We should not be directly dereferencing a rcu pointer, rather we should
> be using rcu helper function rcu_dereferece() inside rcu read critical
> section to get a normal pointer which can be dereferenced.
>
> I tested with qemu with this command
> qemu-system-x86_64 \
> 	-m 2G \
> 	-smp 2 \
> 	-kernel bzImage \
> 	-append "console=ttyS0 root=/dev/sda earlyprintk=serial net.ifnames=0" \
> 	-drive file=bullseye.img,format=raw \
> 	-net user,host=10.0.2.10,hostfwd=tcp:127.0.0.1:10021-:22 \
> 	-net nic,model=e1000 \
> 	-enable-kvm \
> 	-nographic \
> 	-pidfile vm.pid \
> 	2>&1 | tee vm.log
> with lockdep enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c
> index 5b71a5a5cd85..e62bad1ac720 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv04_fence.c
> @@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ struct nv04_fence_priv {
>   static int
>   nv04_fence_emit(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
>   {
> -	struct nvif_push *push = fence->channel->chan.push;
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	struct nvif_push *push = rcu_dereference(fence->channel)->chan.push;
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>   	int ret = PUSH_WAIT(push, 2);
>   	if (ret == 0) {
>   		PUSH_NVSQ(push, NV_SW, 0x0150, fence->base.seqno);

I'm not an expert in nouveau fence channel lifetime, but I'm pretty sure 
this should probably be a rcu_dereference_protected, since a fence 
likely can't lose its channel before its command to signal is submitted.

But in case it's not, I would at least advise to check for 
fence->channel lifetime before submitting a patch like this. At least 
the original code warned about it not being 100% correct.

Cheers,

~Maarten


  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-13  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-13  8:10 [PATCH] driver: gpu: Fixing warning directly dereferencing a rcu pointer Abhinav Singh
2023-11-13  8:24 ` Maarten Lankhorst [this message]
2023-11-13 17:10   ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-13 18:37     ` [PATCH v2] drivers: gpu: Fixing warning directly dereferencing a rcu pointer v2 Abhinav Singh
2023-11-13 18:42     ` [PATCH v2] driver: gpu: Fixing warning directly dereferencing a rcu pointer Abhinav Singh
2023-11-13 18:49       ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-13 18:55         ` Abhinav Singh
2023-11-13 19:00           ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-13 19:13             ` [PATCH v3] " Abhinav Singh
2023-11-13 19:31               ` Abhinav Singh
2023-11-21  1:20               ` [Nouveau] " Danilo Krummrich
2023-11-21  8:59                 ` Abhinav Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f229d1ed-b71e-434a-acca-06ee81826260@linux.intel.com \
    --to=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lyude@redhat.com \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).