From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,osalvador@suse.de,nao.horiguchi@gmail.com,linmiaohe@huawei.com,jane.chu@oracle.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [to-be-updated] mm-memory-failure-try-to-send-sigbus-even-if-unmap-failed.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 10:24:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508172405.8D35CC32781@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm/memory-failure: try to send SIGBUS even if unmap failed
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-memory-failure-try-to-send-sigbus-even-if-unmap-failed.patch
This patch was dropped because an updated version will be merged
------------------------------------------------------
From: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Subject: mm/memory-failure: try to send SIGBUS even if unmap failed
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 17:24:56 -0600
Patch series "Enhance soft hwpoison handling and injection".
This series aim at the following enhancement -
1. Let one hwpoison injector, that is, madvise(MADV_HWPOISON) to behave
more like as if a real UE occurred. Because the other two injectors
such as hwpoison-inject and the 'einj' on x86 can't, and it seems to
me we need a better simulation to real UE scenario.
2. For years, if the kernel is unable to unmap a hwpoisoned page, it send
a SIGKILL instead of SIGBUS to prevent user process from potentially
accessing the page again. But in doing so, the user process also lose
important information: vaddr, for recovery. Fortunately, the kernel
already has code to kill process re-accessing a hwpoisoned page, so
remove the '!unmap_success' check.
3. Right now, if a thp page under GUP longterm pin is hwpoisoned, and
kernel cannot split the thp page, memory-failure simply ignores
the UE and returns. That's not ideal, it could deliver a SIGBUS with
useful information for userspace recovery.
This patch (of 3):
For years when it comes down to kill a process due to hwpoison, a SIGBUS
is delivered only if unmap has been successful. Otherwise, a SIGKILL is
delivered. And the reason for that is to prevent the involved process
from accessing the hwpoisoned page again.
Since then a lot has changed, a hwpoisoned page is marked and upon being
re-accessed, the process will be killed immediately. So let's take out
the '!unmap_success' factor and try to deliver SIGBUS if possible.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240501232458.3919593-1-jane.chu@oracle.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240501232458.3919593-2-jane.chu@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c~mm-memory-failure-try-to-send-sigbus-even-if-unmap-failed
+++ a/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -517,19 +517,14 @@ void add_to_kill_ksm(struct task_struct
* Also when FAIL is set do a force kill because something went
* wrong earlier.
*/
-static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill, bool fail,
+static void kill_procs(struct list_head *to_kill, int forcekill,
unsigned long pfn, int flags)
{
struct to_kill *tk, *next;
list_for_each_entry_safe(tk, next, to_kill, nd) {
if (forcekill) {
- /*
- * In case something went wrong with munmapping
- * make sure the process doesn't catch the
- * signal and then access the memory. Just kill it.
- */
- if (fail || tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
+ if (tk->addr == -EFAULT) {
pr_err("%#lx: forcibly killing %s:%d because of failure to unmap corrupted page\n",
pfn, tk->tsk->comm, tk->tsk->pid);
do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV,
@@ -1660,7 +1655,7 @@ static bool hwpoison_user_mappings(struc
*/
forcekill = folio_test_dirty(folio) || (flags & MF_MUST_KILL) ||
!unmap_success;
- kill_procs(&tokill, forcekill, !unmap_success, pfn, flags);
+ kill_procs(&tokill, forcekill, pfn, flags);
return unmap_success;
}
@@ -1724,7 +1719,7 @@ static void unmap_and_kill(struct list_h
unmap_mapping_range(mapping, start, size, 0);
}
- kill_procs(to_kill, flags & MF_MUST_KILL, false, pfn, flags);
+ kill_procs(to_kill, flags & MF_MUST_KILL, pfn, flags);
}
/*
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from jane.chu@oracle.com are
mm-madvise-add-mf_action_required-to-madvisemadv_hwpoison.patch
mm-memory-failure-send-sigbus-in-the-event-of-thp-split-fail.patch
reply other threads:[~2024-05-08 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240508172405.8D35CC32781@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jane.chu@oracle.com \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).