LVS development archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ismael Luceno <iluceno@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Ismael Luceno" <iluceno@suse.de>,
	"Firo Yang" <firo.yang@suse.com>,
	"Andreas Taschner" <andreas.taschner@suse.com>,
	"Michal Kubeček" <mkubecek@suse.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@verge.net.au>,
	"Julian Anastasov" <ja@ssi.bg>,
	lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: [PATCH] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:44:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240418144434.16407-1-iluceno@suse.de> (raw)

It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
disabling GSO.

IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.

Co-developed-by: Firo Yang <firo.yang@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ismael Luceno <iluceno@suse.de>
Tested-by: Andreas Taschner <andreas.taschner@suse.com>
CC: Michal Kubeček <mkubecek@suse.com>
CC: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
CC: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
CC: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org
CC: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
CC: coreteam@netfilter.org
---
 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
index a0921adc31a9..3205b45ce161 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_sctp.c
@@ -126,7 +126,8 @@ sctp_snat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 	if (sctph->source != cp->vport || payload_csum ||
 	    skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
 		sctph->source = cp->vport;
-		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+		if (!skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
+			sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
 	} else {
 		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
 	}
@@ -174,7 +175,8 @@ sctp_dnat_handler(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ip_vs_protocol *pp,
 	    (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL &&
 	     !(skb_dst(skb)->dev->features & NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC))) {
 		sctph->dest = cp->dport;
-		sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
+		if (!skb_is_gso_sctp(skb))
+			sctp_nat_csum(skb, sctph, sctphoff);
 	} else if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
 		skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
 	}
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-18 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-18 14:44 Ismael Luceno [this message]
2024-04-21 11:01 ` [PATCH] ipvs: Fix checksumming on GSO of SCTP packets Julian Anastasov
2024-04-21 14:26   ` Ismael Luceno
2024-04-21 15:58     ` Julian Anastasov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240418144434.16407-1-iluceno@suse.de \
    --to=iluceno@suse.de \
    --cc=andreas.taschner@suse.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=firo.yang@suse.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).