* [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic
@ 2024-04-17 18:46 Jérôme Carretero
2024-04-18 3:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sasha Neftin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Carretero @ 2024-04-17 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, PaoloAbeni, Thomas Gleixner, John Stultz,
StephenBoyd
Cc: intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 361 bytes --]
Hi,
I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218740 because I'm
not quite sure the culprit is e1000e or some timer stuff.
I just verified that this happens on the latest master.
Let me know if I can (quickly) help,
--
Jérôme
PS: Sorry if I'm sending this to too many people, I did a
get_maintainer timer and e1000e code.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic
2024-04-17 18:46 [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic Jérôme Carretero
@ 2024-04-18 3:44 ` Sasha Neftin
2024-04-19 16:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable) Jérôme Carretero
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Neftin @ 2024-04-18 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Jérôme Carretero, Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen,
David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, PaoloAbeni,
Thomas Gleixner, John Stultz, StephenBoyd, lifshits, Vitaly,
Ruinskiy, Dima, Hui Wang
Cc: netdev, intel-wired-lan, linux-kernel
On 17/04/2024 21:46, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218740 because I'm
> not quite sure the culprit is e1000e or some timer stuff.
Hello Jérôme,
You hit on regression introduced by 6dbdd4de0362 (used the wrong timer
during code running in atomic contexts)
Please, incorporate
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/
in your latest kernel.
Thanks,
sasha
>
> I just verified that this happens on the latest master.
>
>
> Let me know if I can (quickly) help,
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)
2024-04-18 3:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sasha Neftin
@ 2024-04-19 16:20 ` Jérôme Carretero
2024-04-20 16:17 ` Sasha Neftin
2024-04-23 16:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Jérôme Carretero @ 2024-04-19 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Sasha Neftin, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: netdev, intel-wired-lan, linux-kernel, stable
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1144 bytes --]
Hi Sasha,
Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
(not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
so they should get the fix ASAP too.
Tested-by: Jérôme Carretero <cJ-ko@zougloub.eu>
Best regards,
--
Jérôme
On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 06:44 +0300, Sasha Neftin wrote:
> On 17/04/2024 21:46, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218740 because
> > I'm
> > not quite sure the culprit is e1000e or some timer stuff.
>
> Hello Jérôme,
>
> You hit on regression introduced by 6dbdd4de0362 (used the wrong
> timer
> during code running in atomic contexts)
> Please, incorporate
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/
>
> in your latest kernel.
>
> Thanks,
> sasha
>
> >
> > I just verified that this happens on the latest master.
> >
> >
> > Let me know if I can (quickly) help,
> >
> >
>
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 854 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)
2024-04-19 16:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable) Jérôme Carretero
@ 2024-04-20 16:17 ` Sasha Neftin
2024-04-23 16:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Neftin @ 2024-04-20 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Jérôme Carretero, Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: netdev, intel-wired-lan, linux-kernel, stable, Lifshits, Vitaly,
Meir, NaamaX, naamax.meir, Nguyen, Anthony L
On 19/04/2024 19:20, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
>
> Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
>
> Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
> (not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
> commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
> so they should get the fix ASAP too.
>
>
> Tested-by: Jérôme Carretero <cJ-ko@zougloub.eu>
Hello Jérôme,
Can you put your "Tested-by:" tag under
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/
?
(then we will forward it via fixes, hopefully v6.9 candidate will pick
up it)
Thanks,
Sasha
>
>
> Best regards,
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)
2024-04-19 16:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable) Jérôme Carretero
2024-04-20 16:17 ` Sasha Neftin
@ 2024-04-23 16:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-25 6:06 ` Sasha Neftin
2024-04-27 10:54 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
1 sibling, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2024-04-23 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Jérôme Carretero
Cc: Sasha Neftin, netdev, intel-wired-lan, linux-kernel, stable
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:20:05PM -0400, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
>
> Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
>
> Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
> (not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
> commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
> so they should get the fix ASAP too.
The fix needs to show up in Linus's tree, is it on its way there?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)
2024-04-23 16:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2024-04-25 6:06 ` Sasha Neftin
2024-04-27 10:54 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Neftin @ 2024-04-25 6:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Jérôme Carretero
Cc: netdev, intel-wired-lan, linux-kernel, stable, Ruinskiy, Dima,
Lifshits, Vitaly, Nguyen, Anthony L
On 23/04/2024 19:23, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:20:05PM -0400, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
>> Hi Sasha,
>>
>>
>> Thank you, sorry for the delay but I coudln't reboot.
>>
>> Adding Greg KH because I don't know if stable will receive my e-mail
>> (not subscribed) but the regression was integrated in stable:
>> commit 0a4e3c2d976aa4dd38951afd6267f74ef3fade0e
>> so they should get the fix ASAP too.
>
> The fix needs to show up in Linus's tree, is it on its way there?
yes. Routed via intel-wired-lan:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)
2024-04-23 16:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-25 6:06 ` Sasha Neftin
@ 2024-04-27 10:54 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2024-04-27 11:14 ` Greg KH
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Artem S. Tashkinov @ 2024-04-27 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gregkh; +Cc: intel-wired-lan, linux-kernel, stable
Hello,
This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-6.8
Why?
Regards,
Artem
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)
2024-04-27 10:54 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
@ 2024-04-27 11:14 ` Greg KH
2024-04-28 8:01 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2024-04-27 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Artem S. Tashkinov; +Cc: intel-wired-lan, linux-kernel, stable
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:54:23AM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:
What fix?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git/tree/queue-6.8
>
> Why?
What is the git id of the change in Linus's tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)
2024-04-27 11:14 ` Greg KH
@ 2024-04-28 8:01 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-29 17:13 ` Tony Nguyen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) @ 2024-04-28 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Greg KH, Artem S. Tashkinov; +Cc: intel-wired-lan, linux-kernel, stable
On 27.04.24 13:14, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:54:23AM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
>> This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:
> What fix?
FWIW, this one:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/
But sadly the review is still pending (and hence it's not yet eligible
for inclusion in stable afaics):
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ded3e7ae-6a7d-48b2-8acc-c125874ee09f@leemhuis.info/
HTH, Ciao, Thorsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable)
2024-04-28 8:01 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
@ 2024-04-29 17:13 ` Tony Nguyen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Tony Nguyen @ 2024-04-29 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Linux regressions mailing list, Greg KH, Artem S. Tashkinov
Cc: intel-wired-lan, linux-kernel, stable
On 4/28/2024 1:01 AM, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 27.04.24 13:14, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:54:23AM +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
>>> This fix is still not queued in 6.8 stable:
>> What fix?
>
> FWIW, this one:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240417190320.3159360-1-vitaly.lifshits@intel.com/
>
> But sadly the review is still pending (and hence it's not yet eligible
> for inclusion in stable afaics):
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ded3e7ae-6a7d-48b2-8acc-c125874ee09f@leemhuis.info/
The team that deals with this driver had holidays last week so that
delayed things a bit. I was able to touch base with them today and the
patch has been sent to netdev.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240429171040.1152516-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com/
Thanks,
Tony
> HTH, Ciao, Thorsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-29 17:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-17 18:46 [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic Jérôme Carretero
2024-04-18 3:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Sasha Neftin
2024-04-19 16:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [BUG] e1000e, scheduling while atomic (stable) Jérôme Carretero
2024-04-20 16:17 ` Sasha Neftin
2024-04-23 16:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-25 6:06 ` Sasha Neftin
2024-04-27 10:54 ` Artem S. Tashkinov
2024-04-27 11:14 ` Greg KH
2024-04-28 8:01 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-29 17:13 ` Tony Nguyen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).