LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V3 4/6] x86/pkru: Make PKRU=0 actually work
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 22:06:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YL/Nuuu8zvKvh3D0@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tum8xj4x.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:15:42PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> But if nothing touched the FPU between T1 scheduling out and back in,
> then the fpregs_state is still valid which means switch_fpu_return()
> does nothing and just clears TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD. Back to user space with
> DEFAULT_PKRU loaded. -> FAIL #2!

Ah ok.

> Why? It was clearly wrong and I can reproduce it with a hack which
> forces a schedule to a kernel thread and it fails all the way back to
> user space.

Oh, I was speculating about some weird luserspace's behavior of clearing
PKRU and then relying on the buggy behavior of getting PKRU restored to
DEFAULT_PKRU.

I know, it is nuts but it is user-visible change. And yeah, probably
nothing does that...

> I chased that because I observed sporadic failures when forcing PKRU to
> init state and then observed the default key being written. I had some
> extra trace_printks there to analyze something completely different :)

As you do. :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-08 14:36 [patch V3 0/6] x86/fpu: Mop up XSAVES and related damage Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-08 14:36 ` [patch V3 1/6] x86/fpu: Prevent state corruption in __fpu__restore_sig() Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-09 14:46   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-08 14:36 ` [patch V3 2/6] x86/fpu: Invalidate FPU state after a failed XRSTOR from a user buffer Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-09 14:46   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-08 14:36 ` [patch V3 3/6] x86/process: Check PF_KTHREAD and not current->mm for kernel threads Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-09 14:46   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-10 17:10   ` [patch V3 3/6] " Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-10 20:54     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-11  1:04       ` Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-08 14:36 ` [patch V3 4/6] x86/pkru: Make PKRU=0 actually work Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-08 15:40   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-06-08 19:15     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-08 20:06       ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2021-06-08 16:06   ` Dave Hansen
2021-06-08 19:06     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-08 21:37   ` Babu Moger
2021-06-09 14:46   ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/pkru: Write hardware init value to PKRU when xstate is init tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-08 14:36 ` [patch V3 5/6] x86/fpu: Add address range checks to copy_user_to_xstate() Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-09 12:56   ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-08 14:36 ` [patch V3 6/6] selftests/x86: Test signal frame XSTATE header corruption handling Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-09  8:38   ` David Edmondson
2021-06-09 12:56   ` [tip: x86/fpu] " tip-bot2 for Andy Lutomirski
2021-06-08 16:08 ` [patch V3 0/6] x86/fpu: Mop up XSAVES and related damage Dave Hansen
2021-06-08 18:46 ` Rik van Riel
2021-06-09 19:18 ` [PATCH] x86/fpu: Reset state for all signal restore failures Thomas Gleixner
2021-06-10  6:39   ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YL/Nuuu8zvKvh3D0@zn.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).