* Re: [PATCH] pm: remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2
[not found] <20090521082754.1020.73349.sendpatchset@rx1.opensource.se>
@ 2009-05-23 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-23 21:25 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-05-23 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Magnus Damm, Greg KH; +Cc: linux-pm, stern, akpm, pavel, LKML
On Thursday 21 May 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
> From: Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>
>
> Remove the ->suspend_late() and ->resume_early() callbacks
> from struct bus_type V2. These callbacks are legacy stuff
> at this point and since there seem to be no in-tree users
> we may as well remove them. New users should use dev_pm_ops.
I'd like to apply this patch as is.
Greg, is it fine with you?
Best,
Rafael
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>
> ---
>
> Changes since V1:
> - Documentation/power/devices.txt changes
>
> Documentation/power/devices.txt | 34 +++++-----------------------------
> drivers/base/power/main.c | 7 -------
> include/linux/device.h | 2 --
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> --- 0001/Documentation/power/devices.txt
> +++ work/Documentation/power/devices.txt 2009-05-21 17:19:48.000000000 +0900
> @@ -75,9 +75,6 @@ may need to apply in domain-specific way
> struct bus_type {
> ...
> int (*suspend)(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state);
> - int (*suspend_late)(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state);
> -
> - int (*resume_early)(struct device *dev);
> int (*resume)(struct device *dev);
> };
>
> @@ -226,20 +223,7 @@ The phases are seen by driver notificati
>
> This call should handle parts of device suspend logic that require
> sleeping. It probably does work to quiesce the device which hasn't
> - been abstracted into class.suspend() or bus.suspend_late().
> -
> - 3 bus.suspend_late(dev, message) is called with IRQs disabled, and
> - with only one CPU active. Until the bus.resume_early() phase
> - completes (see later), IRQs are not enabled again. This method
> - won't be exposed by all busses; for message based busses like USB,
> - I2C, or SPI, device interactions normally require IRQs. This bus
> - call may be morphed into a driver call with bus-specific parameters.
> -
> - This call might save low level hardware state that might otherwise
> - be lost in the upcoming low power state, and actually put the
> - device into a low power state ... so that in some cases the device
> - may stay partly usable until this late. This "late" call may also
> - help when coping with hardware that behaves badly.
> + been abstracted into class.suspend().
>
> The pm_message_t parameter is currently used to refine those semantics
> (described later).
> @@ -351,19 +335,11 @@ devices processing each phase's calls be
>
> The phases are seen by driver notifications issued in this order:
>
> - 1 bus.resume_early(dev) is called with IRQs disabled, and with
> - only one CPU active. As with bus.suspend_late(), this method
> - won't be supported on busses that require IRQs in order to
> - interact with devices.
> -
> - This reverses the effects of bus.suspend_late().
> -
> - 2 bus.resume(dev) is called next. This may be morphed into a device
> - driver call with bus-specific parameters; implementations may sleep.
> -
> - This reverses the effects of bus.suspend().
> + 1 bus.resume(dev) reverses the effects of bus.suspend(). This may
> + be morphed into a device driver call with bus-specific parameters;
> + implementations may sleep.
>
> - 3 class.resume(dev) is called for devices associated with a class
> + 2 class.resume(dev) is called for devices associated with a class
> that has such a method. Implementations may sleep.
>
> This reverses the effects of class.suspend(), and would usually
> --- 0001/drivers/base/power/main.c
> +++ work/drivers/base/power/main.c 2009-05-21 17:19:42.000000000 +0900
> @@ -334,9 +334,6 @@ static int __device_resume_noirq(struct
> if (dev->bus->pm) {
> pm_dev_dbg(dev, state, "EARLY ");
> error = pm_noirq_op(dev, dev->bus->pm, state);
> - } else if (dev->bus->resume_early) {
> - pm_dev_dbg(dev, state, "legacy EARLY ");
> - error = dev->bus->resume_early(dev);
> }
> End:
> TRACE_RESUME(error);
> @@ -591,10 +588,6 @@ static int __device_suspend_noirq(struct
> if (dev->bus->pm) {
> pm_dev_dbg(dev, state, "LATE ");
> error = pm_noirq_op(dev, dev->bus->pm, state);
> - } else if (dev->bus->suspend_late) {
> - pm_dev_dbg(dev, state, "legacy LATE ");
> - error = dev->bus->suspend_late(dev, state);
> - suspend_report_result(dev->bus->suspend_late, error);
> }
> return error;
> }
> --- 0001/include/linux/device.h
> +++ work/include/linux/device.h 2009-05-21 17:19:42.000000000 +0900
> @@ -62,8 +62,6 @@ struct bus_type {
> void (*shutdown)(struct device *dev);
>
> int (*suspend)(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state);
> - int (*suspend_late)(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state);
> - int (*resume_early)(struct device *dev);
> int (*resume)(struct device *dev);
>
> struct dev_pm_ops *pm;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pm: remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2
2009-05-23 20:58 ` [PATCH] pm: remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-05-23 21:25 ` Greg KH
2009-05-23 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2009-05-23 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Magnus Damm, linux-pm, stern, akpm, pavel, LKML
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 21 May 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > From: Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>
> >
> > Remove the ->suspend_late() and ->resume_early() callbacks
> > from struct bus_type V2. These callbacks are legacy stuff
> > at this point and since there seem to be no in-tree users
> > we may as well remove them. New users should use dev_pm_ops.
>
> I'd like to apply this patch as is.
>
> Greg, is it fine with you?
Yes, please feel free to apply this to your tree:
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
or do you want me to take it in mine? If so, no problem, just let me
know, and resend it.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pm: remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2
2009-05-23 21:25 ` Greg KH
@ 2009-05-23 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-24 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-05-23 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Greg KH; +Cc: Magnus Damm, linux-pm, stern, akpm, pavel, LKML
On Saturday 23 May 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 May 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > > From: Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>
> > >
> > > Remove the ->suspend_late() and ->resume_early() callbacks
> > > from struct bus_type V2. These callbacks are legacy stuff
> > > at this point and since there seem to be no in-tree users
> > > we may as well remove them. New users should use dev_pm_ops.
> >
> > I'd like to apply this patch as is.
> >
> > Greg, is it fine with you?
>
> Yes, please feel free to apply this to your tree:
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
>
> or do you want me to take it in mine? If so, no problem, just let me
> know, and resend it.
I'll handle it, thanks!
Best,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pm: remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2
2009-05-23 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-05-24 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-05-24 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Greg KH; +Cc: Magnus Damm, linux-pm, stern, akpm, pavel, LKML
On Sunday 24 May 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 23 May 2009, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:58:26PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Thursday 21 May 2009, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > > > From: Magnus Damm <damm@igel.co.jp>
> > > >
> > > > Remove the ->suspend_late() and ->resume_early() callbacks
> > > > from struct bus_type V2. These callbacks are legacy stuff
> > > > at this point and since there seem to be no in-tree users
> > > > we may as well remove them. New users should use dev_pm_ops.
> > >
> > > I'd like to apply this patch as is.
> > >
> > > Greg, is it fine with you?
> >
> > Yes, please feel free to apply this to your tree:
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
> >
> > or do you want me to take it in mine? If so, no problem, just let me
> > know, and resend it.
>
> I'll handle it, thanks!
Patch applied to the suspend-2.6 tree (linux-next branch).
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-24 21:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20090521082754.1020.73349.sendpatchset@rx1.opensource.se>
2009-05-23 20:58 ` [PATCH] pm: remove bus_type suspend_late()/resume_early() V2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-23 21:25 ` Greg KH
2009-05-23 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-05-24 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).