LKML Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] trace/kprobe: Remove limit on kretprobe maxactive
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:11:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1624005597.xbhcy9xr3f.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618132636.ceef49ba0fd01bd26508f672@kernel.org>

Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:07:13 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 22:04:34 +0530
>> "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > > 2. Move the kretprobe instance pool from kretprobe to struct task.
>> > >   This pool will allocates one page per task, and shared among all
>> > >   kretprobes. This pool will be allocated when the 1st kretprobe
>> > >   is registered. maxactive will be kept for someone who wants to
>> > >   use per-instance data. But since dynamic event doesn't use it,
>> > >   it will be removed from tracefs and perf.  
>> > 
>> > Won't this result in _more_ memory usage compared to what we have now?
>> 
>> Maybe or maybe not. At least with this approach (or the function graph
>> one), you will allocate enough for the environment involved. If there's
>> thousands of tasks, then yes, it will allocate more memory. But if you are
>> running thousands of tasks, you should have a lot of memory in the machine.
>> 
>> If you are only running a few tasks, it will be less than the current
>> approach.
> 
> Right, this depends on how many tasks you are running on your machine.
> Anyway, since you may not sure how much maxactive is enough, you will
> set maxactive high, then it can consume more than that. Of course you
> can optimize by trial and error. But that does not guarantee all cases,
> because the number of tasks can be increased while tracing. You might
> need to re-configure it by checking the nmissed count again.

Yes. If we go down this route, we should limit the per-task allocation 
to a more reasonable 4k -- powerpc uses 64k pages.

Thanks,
Naveen


  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-18  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-14 18:03 [PATCH 0/2] trace/kprobe: Two fixes for kretprobes Naveen N. Rao
2021-06-14 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] trace/kprobe: Fix count of missed kretprobes in kprobe_profile Naveen N. Rao
2021-06-15  5:47   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-14 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] trace/kprobe: Remove limit on kretprobe maxactive Naveen N. Rao
2021-06-15  9:35   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-15 17:41     ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-06-16  0:46       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-16  1:03         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-06-16  2:27           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-16 15:10             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-17 16:34               ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-06-17 17:07                 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-06-18  4:26                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18  8:41                     ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2021-06-17 16:19         ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-06-18  6:17           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-06-18 13:19             ` Naveen N. Rao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1624005597.xbhcy9xr3f.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=anton@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).