Live-Patching Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jpoimboe@redhat.com, pmladek@suse.com, jikos@kernel.org,
	mbenes@suse.cz, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net
Cc: void@manifault.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] livepatch: Fix kobject refcount bug on klp_init_patch_early failure path
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 07:39:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211221153930.137579-1-void@manifault.com> (raw)

When enabling a klp patch with klp_enable_patch(), klp_init_patch_early()
is invoked to initialize the kobjects for the patch itself, as well as the
'struct klp_object' and 'struct klp_func' objects that comprise it.
However, there are some error paths in klp_enable_patch() where some
kobjects may have been initialized with kobject_init(), but an error code
is still returned due to e.g. a 'struct klp_object' having a NULL funcs
pointer.

In these paths, the initial reference of the kobject of the 'struct
klp_patch' may never be released, along with one or more of its objects and
their functions, as kobject_put() is not invoked on the cleanup path if
klp_init_patch_early() returns an error code.

For example, if an object entry such as the following were added to the
sample livepatch module's klp patch, it would cause the vmlinux klp_object,
and its klp_func which updates 'cmdline_proc_show', to never be released:

static struct klp_object objs[] = {
	{
		/* name being NULL means vmlinux */
		.funcs = funcs,
	},
	{
		/* NULL funcs -- would cause reference leak */
		.name = "kvm",
	}, { }
};

Without this change, if CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT is enabled, and the sample klp
patch is loaded, the kobjects (the patch, the vmlinux 'struct klp_object',
and its func) are observed as initialized, but never released, in the dmesg
log output.  With the change, these kobject references no longer fail to be
released as the error case is properly handled before they are initialized.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
v3:
  - Update patch description to not specifically claim to be fixing a
    "leak", but rather a kobject reference counting bug.
  - Make klp_init_patch_early() void to match klp_init_object_early() and
    klp_init_func_early(), and move the arg validation that previously
    resided there into klp_enable_patch() (where other argument validation
    logic already resides).

v2:
  - Move try_module_get() and the patch->objs NULL check out of
    klp_init_patch_early() to ensure that it's safe to jump to the 'err'
    label on the error path in klp_enable_patch().
  - Fix the patch description to not use markdown, and to use imperative
    language.

 kernel/livepatch/core.c | 31 +++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
index 335d988bd811..7d228cdb44c5 100644
--- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
+++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
@@ -862,14 +862,11 @@ static void klp_init_object_early(struct klp_patch *patch,
 	list_add_tail(&obj->node, &patch->obj_list);
 }
 
-static int klp_init_patch_early(struct klp_patch *patch)
+static void klp_init_patch_early(struct klp_patch *patch)
 {
 	struct klp_object *obj;
 	struct klp_func *func;
 
-	if (!patch->objs)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&patch->list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&patch->obj_list);
 	kobject_init(&patch->kobj, &klp_ktype_patch);
@@ -879,20 +876,12 @@ static int klp_init_patch_early(struct klp_patch *patch)
 	init_completion(&patch->finish);
 
 	klp_for_each_object_static(patch, obj) {
-		if (!obj->funcs)
-			return -EINVAL;
-
 		klp_init_object_early(patch, obj);
 
 		klp_for_each_func_static(obj, func) {
 			klp_init_func_early(obj, func);
 		}
 	}
-
-	if (!try_module_get(patch->mod))
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static int klp_init_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
@@ -1024,10 +1013,17 @@ static int __klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
 int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
 {
 	int ret;
+	struct klp_object *obj;
 
-	if (!patch || !patch->mod)
+	if (!patch || !patch->mod || !patch->objs)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	klp_for_each_object_static(patch, obj) {
+		if (!obj->funcs)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+
 	if (!is_livepatch_module(patch->mod)) {
 		pr_err("module %s is not marked as a livepatch module\n",
 		       patch->mod->name);
@@ -1051,11 +1047,10 @@ int klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	ret = klp_init_patch_early(patch);
-	if (ret) {
-		mutex_unlock(&klp_mutex);
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (!try_module_get(patch->mod))
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	klp_init_patch_early(patch);
 
 	ret = klp_init_patch(patch);
 	if (ret)
-- 
2.30.2


             reply	other threads:[~2021-12-21 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-21 15:39 David Vernet [this message]
2021-12-22 10:22 ` [PATCH v3] livepatch: Fix kobject refcount bug on klp_init_patch_early failure path Petr Mladek
2021-12-22 13:40 ` Miroslav Benes
2021-12-23  0:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-12-23 11:09 ` Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211221153930.137579-1-void@manifault.com \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).