LinuxPPC-Dev Archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] radix/kfence: map __kfence_pool at page granularity
Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 12:33:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a15752b4-011e-4a4a-82c2-9aa6b3b6d655@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240424110926.184077-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com>



Le 24/04/2024 à 13:09, Hari Bathini a écrit :
> When KFENCE is enabled, total system memory is mapped at page level
> granularity. But in radix MMU mode, ~3GB additional memory is needed
> to map 100GB of system memory at page level granularity when compared
> to using 2MB direct mapping. This is not desired considering KFENCE is
> designed to be enabled in production kernels [1]. Also, mapping memory
> allocated for KFENCE pool at page granularity seems sufficient enough
> to enable KFENCE support. So, allocate __kfence_pool during bootup and
> map it at page granularity instead of mapping all system memory at
> page granularity.


That seems to be more or less copied from ARM64 ? Is that the best 
approach ?

Can't you implement arch_kfence_init_pool() instead ?

Also, it seems your patch only addresses PPC64. The same should be done 
for PPC32 and there are probably parts that should be common.

> 
> Without patch:
>      # cat /proc/meminfo
>      MemTotal:       101201920 kB
> 
> With patch:
>      # cat /proc/meminfo
>      MemTotal:       104483904 kB
> 
> All kfence_test.c testcases passed with this patch.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20201103175841.3495947-2-elver@google.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/kfence.h        |  5 ++++
>   arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++------
>   arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c                | 14 ++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kfence.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kfence.h
> index 424ceef82ae6..18ec2b06ba1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kfence.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kfence.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>   #ifndef __ASM_POWERPC_KFENCE_H
>   #define __ASM_POWERPC_KFENCE_H
>   
> +#include <linux/kfence.h>

Why do you need that ? It can't be needed by the extern bool you are 
adding below.

If it is needed by some C file that includes asm/kfence.h, it should 
include linux/kfence.h by itself, see for instance 
mm/kfence/kfence_test.c and mm/kfence/core.c

>   #include <linux/mm.h>
>   #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>   
> @@ -15,6 +16,10 @@
>   #define ARCH_FUNC_PREFIX "."
>   #endif
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KFENCE
> +extern bool kfence_early_init;
> +#endif
> +
>   static inline bool arch_kfence_init_pool(void)
>   {
>   	return true;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c
> index 15e88f1439ec..fccbf92f279b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/radix_pgtable.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
>   #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>   #include <asm/ultravisor.h>
>   #include <asm/set_memory.h>
> +#include <asm/kfence.h>
>   
>   #include <trace/events/thp.h>
>   
> @@ -291,9 +292,8 @@ static unsigned long next_boundary(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
>   	return end;
>   }
>   
> -static int __meminit create_physical_mapping(unsigned long start,
> -					     unsigned long end,
> -					     int nid, pgprot_t _prot)
> +static int __meminit create_physical_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int nid,
> +					     pgprot_t _prot, unsigned long mapping_sz_limit)
>   {
>   	unsigned long vaddr, addr, mapping_size = 0;
>   	bool prev_exec, exec = false;
> @@ -301,7 +301,10 @@ static int __meminit create_physical_mapping(unsigned long start,
>   	int psize;
>   	unsigned long max_mapping_size = memory_block_size;
>   
> -	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled_or_kfence())
> +	if (mapping_sz_limit < max_mapping_size)
> +		max_mapping_size = mapping_sz_limit;
> +
> +	if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
>   		max_mapping_size = PAGE_SIZE;
>   
>   	start = ALIGN(start, PAGE_SIZE);
> @@ -358,6 +361,7 @@ static int __meminit create_physical_mapping(unsigned long start,
>   
>   static void __init radix_init_pgtable(void)
>   {
> +	phys_addr_t kfence_pool __maybe_unused;

Don't do that. Avoid using __maybe_unused.

Instead, declare this var where it is used.

>   	unsigned long rts_field;
>   	phys_addr_t start, end;
>   	u64 i;
> @@ -365,6 +369,13 @@ static void __init radix_init_pgtable(void)
>   	/* We don't support slb for radix */
>   	slb_set_size(0);
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KFENCE
> +	if (kfence_early_init) {

Declare kfence_pool here.

> +		kfence_pool = memblock_phys_alloc(KFENCE_POOL_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		memblock_mark_nomap(kfence_pool, KFENCE_POOL_SIZE);
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Create the linear mapping
>   	 */
> @@ -380,10 +391,18 @@ static void __init radix_init_pgtable(void)
>   			continue;
>   		}
>   
> -		WARN_ON(create_physical_mapping(start, end,
> -						-1, PAGE_KERNEL));
> +		WARN_ON(create_physical_mapping(start, end, -1, PAGE_KERNEL, ~0UL));
>   	}
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KFENCE
> +	if (kfence_early_init) {
> +		create_physical_mapping(kfence_pool, kfence_pool + KFENCE_POOL_SIZE, -1,
> +					PAGE_KERNEL, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		memblock_clear_nomap(kfence_pool, KFENCE_POOL_SIZE);
> +		__kfence_pool = __va(kfence_pool);
> +	}
> +#endif
> +
>   	if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_HVMODE) &&
>   			cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_P9_RADIX_PREFETCH_BUG)) {
>   		/*
> @@ -874,8 +893,7 @@ int __meminit radix__create_section_mapping(unsigned long start,
>   		return -1;
>   	}
>   
> -	return create_physical_mapping(__pa(start), __pa(end),
> -				       nid, prot);
> +	return create_physical_mapping(__pa(start), __pa(end), nid, prot, ~0UL);
>   }
>   
>   int __meminit radix__remove_section_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> index d96bbc001e73..8155bfd6c16b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,20 @@
>   
>   #include <mm/mmu_decl.h>
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KFENCE
> +bool __ro_after_init kfence_early_init = !!CONFIG_KFENCE_SAMPLE_INTERVAL;
> +
> +static int __init parse_kfence_early_init(char *arg)
> +{
> +	int val;
> +
> +	if (get_option(&arg, &val))
> +		kfence_early_init = !!val;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +early_param("kfence.sample_interval", parse_kfence_early_init);
> +#endif
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
>   /*
>    * Given an address within the vmemmap, determine the page that

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-07 12:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-24 11:09 [PATCH 1/2] radix/kfence: map __kfence_pool at page granularity Hari Bathini
2024-04-24 11:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] radix/kfence: support late __kfence_pool allocation Hari Bathini
2024-05-01  7:03   ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-05-01  5:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] radix/kfence: map __kfence_pool at page granularity Ritesh Harjani
2024-05-07 12:33 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a15752b4-011e-4a4a-82c2-9aa6b3b6d655@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).