From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA1DC67861 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2024 15:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=YN1jK3ZT; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VB1zz5cXqz3vZ3 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 02:07:11 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=YN1jK3ZT; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com (client-ip=192.198.163.11; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VB1zB65vxz3d39 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 02:06:29 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1712329591; x=1743865591; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=qlwdvOusJure/L1Yv/zKMo5qRCUbM8BhZMF14KYnllA=; b=YN1jK3ZTGFdc7DKgJxCGy4LviAMEIvXMluJbed3zoygbpWMPWvpSj2oo fgYVaRGm+QejcSsadRN7fwfLMuRNxcrrZUdHPibuuEj8akHO8w5cWLoO6 4pEfcD4mQCJqApDmECpvdVe/ZVrxR5EKqaPBVZjvFt/kS8GeU6JrbqJxn x4tdkIpMpRKxvTVXPdt+B/y4z7/zDP0CuiwkH6FHG9Q//4749BYf8UOJj +sqvhg08swABmdof4S2zQL+U0lFNNlDcnqksCeSolRpM0kPtneH+2iXDK FX+sX7mcYdMPo2Q3LZlPmH7GeorH2F3e/7Lt9XOAgxilkPOeOZOfx9zVO Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: AW9771seTgKGxVVcJnQ9Bg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6cPSdNeXSHW1uqGCDJgmNQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11035"; a="18271644" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,181,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="18271644" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2024 08:06:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11035"; a="915256454" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,181,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="915256454" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Apr 2024 08:06:23 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rsl92-00000001mBS-3ubw; Fri, 05 Apr 2024 18:06:20 +0300 Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 18:06:20 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] powerpc/52xx: Replace of_gpio.h by proper one Message-ID: References: <20240313135645.2066362-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <871q7k8ytc.fsf@mail.lhotse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871q7k8ytc.fsf@mail.lhotse> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nicholas Piggin , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , "Naveen N. Rao" , Anatolij Gustschin , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 10:58:55AM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Andy Shevchenko writes: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:56:45PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> of_gpio.h is deprecated and subject to remove. > >> The driver doesn't use it directly, replace it > >> with what is really being used. > > > > Any comments on this? > > No comment :) > > I'll take it for 6.10, or do you want me to sneak it in as a fix for 6.9? Up to you and thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko