* [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers Wengang Wang
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
Background:
We have the existing xfs_fsr tool which do defragment for files. It has the
following features:
1. Defragment is implemented by file copying.
2. The copy (to a temporary file) is exclusive. The source file is locked
during the copy (to a temporary file) and all IO requests are blocked
before the copy is done.
3. The copy could take long time for huge files with IO blocked.
4. The copy requires as many free blocks as the source file has.
If the source is huge, say it’s 1TiB, it’s hard to require the file
system to have another 1TiB free.
The use case in concern is that the XFS files are used as images files for
Virtual Machines.
1. The image files are huge, they can reach hundreds of GiB and even to TiB.
2. Backups are made via reflink copies, and CoW makes the files badly fragmented.
3. fragmentation make reflink copies super slow.
4. during the reflink copy, all IO requests to the file are blocked for super
long time. That makes timeout in VM and the timeout lead to disaster.
This feature aims to:
1. reduce the file fragmentation making future reflink (much) faster and
2. at the same time, defragmentation works in non-exclusive manner, it doesn’t
block file IOs long.
Non-exclusive defragment
Here we are introducing the non-exclusive manner to defragment a file,
especially for huge files, without blocking IO to it long. Non-exclusive
defragmentation divides the whole file into small pieces. For each piece,
we lock the file, defragment the piece and unlock the file. Defragmenting
the small piece doesn’t take long. File IO requests can get served between
pieces before blocked long. Also we put (user adjustable) idle time between
defragmenting two consecutive pieces to balance the defragmentation and file IOs.
So though the defragmentation could take longer than xfs_fsr, it balances
defragmentation and file IOs.
Operation target
The operation targets are files in XFS filesystem
User interface
A fresh new command xfs_defrag is provided. User can
start/stop/suspend/resume/get-status the defragmentation against a file.
With xfs_defrag command user can specify:
1. target extent size, extents under which are defragment target extents.
2. piece size, the whole file are divided into piece according to the piece size.
3. idle time, the idle time between defragmenting two adjacent pieces.
Piece
Piece is the smallest unit that we do defragmentation. A piece contains a range
of contiguous file blocks, it may contain one or more extents.
Target Extent Size
This is a configuration value in blocks indicating which extents are
defragmentation targets. Extents which are larger than this value are the Target
Extents. When a piece contains two or more Target Extents, the piece is a Target
Piece. Defragmenting a piece requires at least 2 x TES free file system contiguous
blocks. In case TES is set too big, the defragmentation could fail to allocate
that many contiguous file system blocks. By default it’s 64 blocks.
Piece Size
This is a configuration value indicating the size of the piece in blocks, a piece
is no larger than this size. Defragmenting a piece requires up to PS free
filesystem contiguous blocks. In case PS is set too big, the defragmentation could
fail to allocate that many contiguous file system blocks. 4096 blocks by default,
and 4096 blocks as maximum.
Error reporting
When the defragmentation fails (usually due to file system block allocation
failure), the error will return to user application when the application fetches
the defragmentation status.
Idle Time
Idle time is a configuration value, it is the time defragmentation would idle
between defragmenting two adjacent pieces. We have no limitation on IT.
Some test result:
50GiB file with 2013990 extents, average 6.5 blocks per extent.
Relink copy used 40s (then reflink copy removed before following tests)
Use above as block device in VM, creating XFS v5 on that VM block device.
Mount and build kernel from VM (buffered writes + fsync to backed image file) without defrag: 13m39.497s
Kernel build from VM (buffered writes + sync) with defrag (target extent = 256,
piece size = 4096, idle time = 1000 ms): 15m1.183s
Defrag used: 123m27.354s
Wengang Wang (9):
xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers.
xfs: defrag: initialization and cleanup
xfs: defrag implement stop/suspend/resume/status
xfs: defrag: allocate/cleanup defragmentation
xfs: defrag: process some cases in xfs_defrag_process
xfs: defrag: piece picking up
xfs: defrag: guarantee contigurous blocks in cow fork
xfs: defrag: copy data from old blocks to new blocks
xfs: defrag: map new blocks
fs/xfs/Makefile | 1 +
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h | 1 +
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 1074 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.h | 11 +
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 4 +
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 1 +
fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 17 +
fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 3 +
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h | 37 ++
fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 7 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h | 3 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 3 +
include/linux/fs.h | 5 +
15 files changed, 1165 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
create mode 100644 fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.h
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/9] xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers.
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 5:35 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: defrag: initialization and cleanup Wengang Wang
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
introduce strucutures and numbers only.
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/Makefile | 1 +
fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h | 1 +
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.h | 11 ++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 17 ++++++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
create mode 100644 fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.h
diff --git a/fs/xfs/Makefile b/fs/xfs/Makefile
index 7762c01a85cf..ba7f7bc4abf9 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/Makefile
+++ b/fs/xfs/Makefile
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ xfs-y += xfs_aops.o \
xfs_sysfs.o \
xfs_trans.o \
xfs_xattr.o \
+ xfs_defrag.o \
kmem.o
# low-level transaction/log code
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
index 6360073865db..4b0fdb900df5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h
@@ -837,6 +837,7 @@ struct xfs_scrub_metadata {
#define XFS_IOC_FSGEOMETRY _IOR ('X', 126, struct xfs_fsop_geom)
#define XFS_IOC_BULKSTAT _IOR ('X', 127, struct xfs_bulkstat_req)
#define XFS_IOC_INUMBERS _IOR ('X', 128, struct xfs_inumbers_req)
+#define XFS_IOC_DEFRAG _IOWR('X', 129, struct xfs_defrag)
/* XFS_IOC_GETFSUUID ---------- deprecated 140 */
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..954d05376809
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
+ * Author: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
+ */
+#include "xfs.h"
+#include "xfs_fs.h"
+#include "xfs_format.h"
+#include "xfs_shared.h"
+#include "xfs_trans_resv.h"
+#include "xfs_mount.h"
+#include "xfs_bmap.h"
+#include "xfs_inode_fork.h"
+#include "xfs_inode.h"
+#include "xfs_reflink.h"
+#include "xfs_log_format.h"
+#include "xfs_trans.h"
+#include "xfs_bit.h"
+#include "xfs_buf.h"
+#include "xfs_bmap_btree.h"
+#include "xfs_trans_space.h"
+#include "xfs_ag.h"
+#include "xfs_alloc.h"
+#include "xfs_refcount_btree.h"
+#include "xfs_btree.h"
+#include "xfs_refcount.h"
+#include "xfs_defer.h"
+#include "xfs_log_priv.h"
+#include "xfs_extfree_item.h"
+#include "xfs_bmap_item.h"
+#include "xfs_quota_defs.h"
+#include "xfs_quota.h"
+
+#include <linux/sort.h>
+
+/*
+ * The max number of extents in a piece.
+ * can't be too big, it will have log space presure
+ */
+#define XFS_DEFRAG_PIECE_MAX_EXT 512
+
+/*
+ * Milliseconds we leave the info unremoved when a defrag failed.
+ * This aims to give user space a way to get the error code.
+ */
+#define XFS_DERFAG_GRACE_PERIOD 30000
+
+/* limitation of pending online defrag */
+#define XFS_DEFRAG_MAX_PARALLEL 128
+
+/*
+ * The max size, in blocks, of a piece.
+ * can't be too big, it may hard to get such a free extent
+ */
+#define XFS_DEFRAG_MAX_PIECE_BLOCKS 4096U
+
+int xfs_file_defrag(struct file *filp, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..21113d8c1567
--- /dev/null
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.h
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
+ * Author: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
+ */
+#ifndef __XFS_DEFRAG_H__
+#define __XFS_DEFRAG_H__
+void xfs_initialize_defrag(struct xfs_mount *mp);
+int xfs_file_defrag(struct file *filp, struct xfs_defrag *defrag);
+void xfs_stop_wait_defrags(struct xfs_mount *mp);
+#endif /* __XFS_DEFRAG_H__ */
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
index 6c3919687ea6..7f7a7094ace9 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
#include "xfs_ioctl.h"
#include "xfs_xattr.h"
#include "xfs_rtbitmap.h"
+#include "xfs_defrag.h"
#include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
@@ -2160,6 +2161,22 @@ xfs_file_ioctl(
return error;
}
+ case XFS_IOC_DEFRAG: {
+ struct xfs_defrag defrag;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (xfs_is_readonly(mp))
+ return -EROFS;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(&defrag, arg, sizeof(defrag)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ ret = xfs_file_defrag(filp, &defrag);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ ret = copy_to_user(arg, &defrag, sizeof(defrag));
+ return ret;
+ }
+
default:
return -ENOTTY;
}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
index 503fe3c7edbf..05b372cde389 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
@@ -71,6 +71,34 @@ struct xfs_inodegc {
unsigned int cpu;
};
+/* Online Defrag */
+enum xfs_defrag_cmd {
+ XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_START = 1, /* start defrag, or change configuration */
+ XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_STOP, /* stop defrag */
+ XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_SUSPEND, /* suspend on going defrag */
+ XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_RESUME, /* resume suspended defrag */
+ XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_STATUS, /* get status */
+};
+
+struct xfs_defrag {
+ /* [IN] XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_* */
+ enum xfs_defrag_cmd df_cmd;
+ /* [IN] the size of piece in blocks */
+ unsigned int df_piece_size;
+ /* [IN] the target extent size */
+ unsigned int df_tgt_extsize;
+ /* [IN] idle time in ms between adjacent pieces */
+ unsigned int df_idle_time;
+ /* [OUT] current running status */
+ int df_status;
+ /* [OUT] the number of the processed blocks */
+ unsigned long long df_blocks_done;
+ /* [OUT] inode number of the file under defragmentation */
+ unsigned long df_ino;
+ /* [OUT] defragmenting on this file is suspended */
+ bool df_suspended;
+};
+
/*
* The struct xfsmount layout is optimised to separate read-mostly variables
* from variables that are frequently modified. We put the read-mostly variables
@@ -252,6 +280,15 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
/* cpus that have inodes queued for inactivation */
struct cpumask m_inodegc_cpumask;
+
+ /* lock to serialize the access of defrags fields */
+ struct semaphore m_defrag_lock;
+ /* number of pending defragmentation in this FS */
+ unsigned int m_nr_defrag;
+ /* list that links up all pending defragmentation */
+ struct list_head m_defrag_list;
+ /* the task which does defragmentation job */
+ struct task_struct *m_defrag_task;
} xfs_mount_t;
#define M_IGEO(mp) (&(mp)->m_ino_geo)
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/9] xfs: defrag: initialization and cleanup
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 14:09 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: defrag implement stop/suspend/resume/status Wengang Wang
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
initialization online defrag on a new mount.
cleanup when unmounting.
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 3 +++
fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 3 +++
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
index 954d05376809..8bdc6290a69d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
@@ -54,6 +54,29 @@
*/
#define XFS_DEFRAG_MAX_PIECE_BLOCKS 4096U
+/* initialization called for new mount */
+void xfs_initialize_defrag(struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ sema_init(&mp->m_defrag_lock, 1);
+ mp->m_nr_defrag = 0;
+ mp->m_defrag_task = NULL;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mp->m_defrag_list);
+}
+
+/* stop all the defragmentations on this mount and wait until they really stopped */
+void xfs_stop_wait_defrags(struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&mp->m_defrag_list)) {
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ return;
+ }
+ ASSERT(mp->m_defrag_task);
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ kthread_stop(mp->m_defrag_task);
+ mp->m_defrag_task = NULL;
+}
+
int xfs_file_defrag(struct file *filp, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
{
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
index aed5be5508fe..ed7e1f150b59 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include "xfs_trace.h"
#include "xfs_ag.h"
#include "scrub/stats.h"
+#include "xfs_defrag.h"
static DEFINE_MUTEX(xfs_uuid_table_mutex);
static int xfs_uuid_table_size;
@@ -1056,6 +1057,8 @@ xfs_unmountfs(
uint64_t resblks;
int error;
+ xfs_stop_wait_defrags(mp);
+
/*
* Perform all on-disk metadata updates required to inactivate inodes
* that the VFS evicted earlier in the unmount process. Freeing inodes
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
index 764304595e8b..f74706130e35 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include "xfs_dahash_test.h"
#include "xfs_rtbitmap.h"
#include "scrub/stats.h"
+#include "xfs_defrag.h"
#include <linux/magic.h>
#include <linux/fs_context.h>
@@ -2023,6 +2024,8 @@ static int xfs_init_fs_context(
fc->s_fs_info = mp;
fc->ops = &xfs_context_ops;
+ xfs_initialize_defrag(mp);
+
return 0;
}
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/9] xfs: defrag implement stop/suspend/resume/status
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: defrag: initialization and cleanup Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: defrag: allocate/cleanup defragmentation Wengang Wang
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
1. we support at most 128 running file defragmentation at a time.
2. the max piece size is 4096
3. the max piece size must no less than twice of target extent size
4. defrag jobs are stored in mp->m_defrag_list.
5. for 'status' command, set the inode number to -1UL for return
6. a separated process m_defrag_task processes all defragmentation jobs
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 200 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 199 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
index 8bdc6290a69d..4a10528912ca 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
@@ -54,6 +54,47 @@
*/
#define XFS_DEFRAG_MAX_PIECE_BLOCKS 4096U
+/*
+ * A piece is a contigurous (by file block number) range in a file. It contains one
+ * or more extents. When it contains two or more extents, it's subject to be
+ * defragmented. During the defragmenting, the original extents are
+ * deallocated and replaced by a single new-allocated extent covering this
+ * whole piece.
+ */
+struct xfs_defrag_piece {
+ /* the start file block in this piece */
+ xfs_fileoff_t dp_start_off;
+ /* number of blocks contained in this piece */
+ xfs_filblks_t dp_len;
+ /*
+ * the extents in this piece. they are contigourous by file block
+ * number after the piece is picked. they are sorted by filesystem
+ * lock number (low -> high) before unmapping.
+ */
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec dp_extents[XFS_DEFRAG_PIECE_MAX_EXT];
+ /* number of xfs_bmbt_irecs in dp_extents */
+ int dp_nr_ext;
+};
+
+struct xfs_defrag_info {
+ /* links to xfs_mount.m_defrag_list */
+ struct list_head di_list; /* links to xfs_mount.m_defrag_list */
+ /* defrag configuration and status */
+ struct xfs_defrag di_defrag;
+ /* the xfs_inode to defragment on */
+ struct xfs_inode *di_ip;
+ /* next file block to start with */
+ xfs_fileoff_t di_next_blk;
+ /* number of pieces which are defragmented */
+ unsigned long di_round_nr;
+ /* current piece to defragment */
+ struct xfs_defrag_piece di_dp;
+ /* timestamp of last defragmenting in jiffies */
+ unsigned long di_last_process;
+ /* flag indicating if defragmentation is stopped by user */
+ bool di_user_stopped;
+};
+
/* initialization called for new mount */
void xfs_initialize_defrag(struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
@@ -77,7 +118,164 @@ void xfs_stop_wait_defrags(struct xfs_mount *mp)
mp->m_defrag_task = NULL;
}
-int xfs_file_defrag(struct file *filp, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
+
+static bool xfs_is_defrag_param_valid(struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
+{
+ if (defrag->df_piece_size > XFS_DEFRAG_MAX_PIECE_BLOCKS)
+ return false;
+ if (defrag->df_piece_size < 2 * defrag->df_tgt_extsize)
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool __xfs_new_defrag_allowed(struct xfs_mount *mp)
+ {
+ if (mp->m_nr_defrag >= XFS_DEFRAG_MAX_PARALLEL)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * lookup this mount for the xfs_defrag_info structure specified by @ino
+ * m_defrag_lock is held by caller.
+ * returns:
+ * The pointer to that structure on found or NULL if not found.
+ */
+struct xfs_defrag_info *__xfs_find_defrag(unsigned long ino,
+ struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *di;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(di, &mp->m_defrag_list, di_list) {
+ if (di->di_defrag.df_ino == ino)
+ return di;
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+/* start a new defragmetation or change the parameters on the existing one */
+static int xfs_file_defrag_start(struct inode *inode, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
{
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if ((inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) != S_IFREG) {
+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (IS_DAX(inode)) {
+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!xfs_is_defrag_param_valid(defrag)) {
+ ret = EINVAL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+out:
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
+static void xfs_file_defrag_status(struct inode *inode, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
+{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = XFS_I(inode)->i_mount;
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *di;
+
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ di = __xfs_find_defrag(inode->i_ino, mp);
+ if (di == NULL) {
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ defrag->df_ino = -1UL;
+ return;
+ }
+ di->di_defrag.df_cmd = defrag->df_cmd;
+ *defrag = di->di_defrag;
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+}
+
+static int xfs_file_defrag_stop(struct inode *inode, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
+{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = XFS_I(inode)->i_mount;
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *di;
+
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ di = __xfs_find_defrag(inode->i_ino, mp);
+ if (di == NULL) {
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ defrag->df_ino = -1UL;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ di->di_user_stopped = true;
+ di->di_defrag.df_cmd = defrag->df_cmd;
+ *defrag = di->di_defrag;
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ /* wait up the process to process the dropping */
+ wake_up_process(mp->m_defrag_task);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int xfs_file_defrag_suspend(struct inode *inode, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
+{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = XFS_I(inode)->i_mount;
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *di;
+
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ di = __xfs_find_defrag(inode->i_ino, mp);
+ if (di == NULL) {
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ defrag->df_ino = -1UL;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ di->di_defrag.df_suspended = true;
+ di->di_defrag.df_cmd = defrag->df_cmd;
+ *defrag = di->di_defrag;
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int xfs_file_defrag_resume(struct inode *inode, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
+{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = XFS_I(inode)->i_mount;
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *di;
+
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ di = __xfs_find_defrag(inode->i_ino, mp);
+ if (di == NULL) {
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ defrag->df_ino = -1UL;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ di->di_defrag.df_suspended = false;
+
+ di->di_defrag.df_cmd = defrag->df_cmd;
+ *defrag = di->di_defrag;
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ wake_up_process(mp->m_defrag_task);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int xfs_file_defrag(struct file *filp, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
+{
+ struct inode *inode = filp->f_inode;
+
+ defrag->df_ino = inode->i_ino;
+
+ switch (defrag->df_cmd) {
+ case XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_START:
+ return xfs_file_defrag_start(inode, defrag);
+ case XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_STOP:
+ return xfs_file_defrag_stop(inode, defrag);
+ case XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_STATUS:
+ xfs_file_defrag_status(inode, defrag);
+ return 0;
+ case XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_SUSPEND:
+ return xfs_file_defrag_suspend(inode, defrag);
+ case XFS_DEFRAG_CMD_RESUME:
+ return xfs_file_defrag_resume(inode, defrag);
+ default:
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
}
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/9] xfs: defrag: allocate/cleanup defragmentation
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: defrag implement stop/suspend/resume/status Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: defrag: process some cases in xfs_defrag_process Wengang Wang
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
1. allocate new defragmentation
2. clean up defragentations
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
index 4a10528912ca..fec617ac5945 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
@@ -154,9 +154,74 @@ struct xfs_defrag_info *__xfs_find_defrag(unsigned long ino,
return NULL;
}
+static void xfs_change_defrag_param(struct xfs_defrag *to, struct xfs_defrag *from)
+{
+ to->df_piece_size = from->df_piece_size;
+ to->df_tgt_extsize = from->df_tgt_extsize;
+ to->df_idle_time = from->df_idle_time;
+ to->df_ino = from->df_ino;
+}
+
+/* caller holds m_defrag_lock */
+static struct xfs_defrag_info *__alloc_new_defrag_info(struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *di;
+
+ di = kmem_alloc(sizeof(struct xfs_defrag_info), KM_ZERO);
+ mp->m_nr_defrag++;
+ return di;
+}
+
+/* sleep some jiffies */
+static inline void xfs_defrag_idle(unsigned int idle_jiffies)
+{
+ if (idle_jiffies > 0) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ schedule_timeout(idle_jiffies);
+ }
+}
+
+/* caller holds mp->m_defrag_lock */
+static void __xfs_drop_defrag(struct xfs_defrag_info *di, struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ list_del(&di->di_list);
+ mp->m_nr_defrag--;
+ iput(VFS_I(di->di_ip));
+ kfree(di);
+}
+
+/* clean up all defragmentation jobs in this XFS */
+void clean_up_defrags(struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *di, *tmp;
+
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(di, tmp, &mp->m_defrag_list, di_list) {
+ __xfs_drop_defrag(di, mp);
+ }
+ ASSERT(mp->m_nr_defrag == 0);
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+}
+
+/* run as a separated process.
+ * defragment files in mp->m_defrag_list
+ */
+int xfs_defrag_process(void *data)
+{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = data;
+
+ while (!kthread_should_stop())
+ xfs_defrag_idle(1000);
+
+ clean_up_defrags(mp);
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* start a new defragmetation or change the parameters on the existing one */
static int xfs_file_defrag_start(struct inode *inode, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = XFS_I(inode)->i_mount;
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *di = NULL;
int ret = 0;
if ((inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) != S_IFREG) {
@@ -174,9 +239,63 @@ static int xfs_file_defrag_start(struct inode *inode, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
goto out;
}
+ /* racing with unmount and freeze */
+ if (down_read_trylock(&inode->i_sb->s_umount) == 0) {
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ if (!__xfs_new_defrag_allowed(mp)) {
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ goto up_return;
+ }
+
+ di = __xfs_find_defrag(inode->i_ino, mp);
+ if (di) {
+ /*
+ * the file is already under defragmentation,
+ * a subsequential "start" is used to adjust parameters
+ * on the existing defragmentation
+ */
+ xfs_change_defrag_param(&di->di_defrag, defrag);
+ ret = 0;
+ goto up_return;
+ }
+
+ inode = igrab(inode);
+ if (!inode) {
+ ret = -EAGAIN;
+ goto up_return;
+ }
+
+ /* a new defragmentation */
+ di = __alloc_new_defrag_info(mp);
+ xfs_change_defrag_param(&di->di_defrag, defrag);
+ di->di_ip = XFS_I(inode);
+ list_add_tail(&di->di_list, &mp->m_defrag_list);
+
+ /*
+ * defrag process per FS is creatd on demand and keep alive until
+ * FS is unmounted.
+ */
+ if (mp->m_defrag_task == NULL) {
+ mp->m_defrag_task = kthread_run(xfs_defrag_process, mp,
+ "xdf_%s", mp->m_super->s_id);
+ if (IS_ERR(mp->m_defrag_task)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(mp->m_defrag_task);
+ mp->m_defrag_task = NULL;
+ }
+ } else {
+ wake_up_process(mp->m_defrag_task);
+ }
+
+up_return:
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ up_read(&inode->i_sb->s_umount);
out:
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- }
+ return ret;
+}
static void xfs_file_defrag_status(struct inode *inode, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
{
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/9] xfs: defrag: process some cases in xfs_defrag_process
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: defrag: allocate/cleanup defragmentation Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: defrag: piece picking up Wengang Wang
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
In the main process xfs_defrag_process(), deal with following cases:
1. sleep until next defragmentation time come
2. sleep if no defragmetation job exist
3. defragmentation job is stopped by user
4. defragmentation job failed (stay a while for user to pick up error)
5. defragmentation job is suspended
6. defragmentation job is done successfully
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 144 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
index fec617ac5945..aee4cfd3f86e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
@@ -190,6 +190,14 @@ static void __xfs_drop_defrag(struct xfs_defrag_info *di, struct xfs_mount *mp)
kfree(di);
}
+/* cleanup when a defragmentation is done, failed, or cancelled. */
+static void xfs_drop_defrag(struct xfs_defrag_info *di, struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ __xfs_drop_defrag(di, mp);
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+}
+
/* clean up all defragmentation jobs in this XFS */
void clean_up_defrags(struct xfs_mount *mp)
{
@@ -203,15 +211,149 @@ void clean_up_defrags(struct xfs_mount *mp)
up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
}
+/*
+ * if mp->m_defrag_list is not empty, return the first one in the list.
+ * returns NULL otherwise.
+ */
+static struct xfs_defrag_info *get_first_defrag(struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *first;
+
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&mp->m_defrag_list))
+ first = NULL;
+ else
+ first = container_of(mp->m_defrag_list.next,
+ struct xfs_defrag_info, di_list);
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ return first;
+}
+
+/*
+ * if mp->m_defrag_list is not empty, return the last one in the list.
+ * returns NULL otherwise.
+ */
+static struct xfs_defrag_info *get_last_defrag(struct xfs_mount *mp)
+{
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *last;
+
+ down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ if (list_empty(&mp->m_defrag_list))
+ last = NULL;
+ else
+ last = container_of(mp->m_defrag_list.prev,
+ struct xfs_defrag_info, di_list);
+ up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
+ return last;
+}
+
+static inline bool xfs_defrag_failed(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
+{
+ return di->di_defrag.df_status != 0;
+}
+
+/* so far do nothing */
+static bool xfs_defrag_file(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool xfs_defrag_suspended(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
+{
+ return di->di_defrag.df_suspended;
+}
+
/* run as a separated process.
* defragment files in mp->m_defrag_list
*/
int xfs_defrag_process(void *data)
{
+ unsigned long smallest_wait = ULONG_MAX;
struct xfs_mount *mp = data;
+ struct xfs_defrag_info *di, *last;
+
+ while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
+ bool defrag_any = false;
- while (!kthread_should_stop())
- xfs_defrag_idle(1000);
+ if (smallest_wait != ULONG_MAX) {
+ smallest_wait = max_t(unsigned long, smallest_wait, 10);
+ xfs_defrag_idle(smallest_wait);
+ smallest_wait = ULONG_MAX;
+ }
+
+ last = get_last_defrag(mp);
+ if (!last) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ schedule();
+ continue; /* while loop */
+ }
+
+ do {
+ unsigned long next_defrag_time;
+ unsigned long save_jiffies;
+
+ if (kthread_should_stop())
+ break; /* do */
+
+ di = get_first_defrag(mp);
+ /* done this round */
+ if (!di)
+ break; /* do */
+
+ /* stopped by user, clean up right now */
+ if (di->di_user_stopped) {
+ xfs_drop_defrag(di, mp);
+ continue; /* do */
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Defrag failed on this file, give some grace time, say 30s
+ * for user space to capture the error
+ */
+ if (xfs_defrag_failed(di)) {
+ unsigned long drop_time = di->di_last_process
+ + msecs_to_jiffies(XFS_DERFAG_GRACE_PERIOD);
+ save_jiffies = jiffies;
+ /* not the time to drop this failed file yet */
+ if (time_before(save_jiffies, drop_time)) {
+ /* wait a while before dropping this file */
+ if (smallest_wait > drop_time - save_jiffies)
+ smallest_wait = drop_time - save_jiffies;
+ } else {
+ xfs_drop_defrag(di, mp);
+ }
+ continue; /* do */
+ }
+
+ if (xfs_defrag_suspended(di))
+ continue; /* do */
+
+ next_defrag_time = di->di_last_process
+ + msecs_to_jiffies(di->di_defrag.df_idle_time);
+
+ save_jiffies = jiffies;
+ if (time_before(save_jiffies, next_defrag_time)) {
+ if (smallest_wait > next_defrag_time - save_jiffies)
+ smallest_wait = next_defrag_time - save_jiffies;
+ continue; /* do */
+ }
+
+ defrag_any = true;
+ /* whole file defrag done successfully */
+ if (xfs_defrag_file(di))
+ xfs_drop_defrag(di, mp);
+
+ /* avoid tight CPU usage */
+ xfs_defrag_idle(2);
+ } while (di != last);
+
+ /* all the left defragmentations are suspended */
+ if (defrag_any == false && smallest_wait == ULONG_MAX) {
+ set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ schedule();
+ }
+
+ }
clean_up_defrags(mp);
return 0;
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 6/9] xfs: defrag: piece picking up
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: defrag: process some cases in xfs_defrag_process Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: defrag: guarantee contigurous blocks in cow fork Wengang Wang
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
A extent in a piece must:
1. be real extent
2. not 'unwritten' extent
3. size no bigger than target extent size
Extents in a piece must be contigurous by file block, there can't
be holes in pieces.
There can be up to XFS_DEFRAG_PIECE_MAX_EXT (512) extents in a piece.
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 1 +
include/linux/fs.h | 5 ++
3 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
index aee4cfd3f86e..3b90ba07c73a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
@@ -252,10 +252,191 @@ static inline bool xfs_defrag_failed(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
return di->di_defrag.df_status != 0;
}
-/* so far do nothing */
+static inline void xfs_set_defrag_error(struct xfs_defrag *df, int error)
+{
+ if (df->df_status == 0)
+ df->df_status = error;
+}
+
+static void xfs_piece_reset(struct xfs_defrag_piece *dp)
+{
+ dp->dp_start_off = 0;
+ dp->dp_len = 0;
+ dp->dp_nr_ext = 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check if the given extent should be skipped from defragmenting
+ * The following extents are skipped
+ * 1. non "real"
+ * 2. unwritten
+ * 3. size bigger than target
+ * returns:
+ * true -- skip this extent
+ * false -- don't skip
+ */
+static bool xfs_extent_skip_defrag(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *check,
+ struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
+{
+ if (!xfs_bmap_is_real_extent(check))
+ return true;
+ if (check->br_state == XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN)
+ return true;
+ if (check->br_blockcount > defrag->df_tgt_extsize)
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * add extent to piece
+ * the extent is expected to be behind all the existing extents.
+ * returns:
+ * true -- the piece is full with extents
+ * false -- not full yet
+ */
+static bool xfs_add_extent_to_piece(struct xfs_defrag_piece *dp,
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec *add,
+ struct xfs_defrag *defrag,
+ int pos_in_piece)
+{
+ ASSERT(dp->dp_nr_ext < XFS_DEFRAG_PIECE_MAX_EXT);
+ ASSERT(pos_in_piece < XFS_DEFRAG_PIECE_MAX_EXT);
+ dp->dp_extents[pos_in_piece] = *add;
+ dp->dp_len += add->br_blockcount;
+
+ /* set up starting file offset */
+ if (dp->dp_nr_ext == 0)
+ dp->dp_start_off = add->br_startoff;
+ dp->dp_nr_ext++;
+ if (dp->dp_nr_ext == XFS_DEFRAG_PIECE_MAX_EXT)
+ return true;
+ if (dp->dp_len >= defrag->df_piece_size)
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * check if the given extent is contiguous, by file block number, with the
+ * previous one in the piece
+ */
+static bool xfs_is_contig_ext(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *check,
+ struct xfs_defrag_piece *dp)
+{
+ /* it's contig if the piece is empty */
+ if (dp->dp_len == 0)
+ return true;
+ return dp->dp_start_off + dp->dp_len == check->br_startoff;
+}
+
+/*
+ * pick next piece to defragment starting from the @di->di_next_blk
+ * takes and drops XFS_ILOCK_SHARED lock
+ * returns:
+ * true: piece is selected.
+ * false: no more pieces in this file.
+ */
+static bool xfs_pick_next_piece(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
+{
+ struct xfs_defrag *defrag = &di->di_defrag;
+ int pos_in_piece = 0;
+ struct xfs_defrag_piece *dp = &di->di_dp;
+ struct xfs_inode *ip = di->di_ip;
+ bool found;
+ struct xfs_iext_cursor icur;
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec got;
+
+ xfs_piece_reset(dp);
+ xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
+ found = xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, &ip->i_df, di->di_next_blk, &icur, &got);
+
+ /* fill the piece until it get full or the it reaches block limit */
+ while (found) {
+ if (xfs_extent_skip_defrag(&got, defrag)) {
+ if (dp->dp_len) {
+ /* this piece already has some extents, return */
+ break;
+ }
+ goto next_ext;
+ }
+
+ if (!xfs_is_contig_ext(&got, dp)) {
+ /* this extent is not contigurous with previous one, finish this piece */
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (xfs_add_extent_to_piece(dp, &got, defrag, pos_in_piece++)) {
+ /* this piece is full */
+ break;
+ }
+
+next_ext:
+ found = xfs_iext_next_extent(&ip->i_df, &icur, &got);
+ }
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
+
+ /* set the starting file block for next piece */
+ di->di_next_blk = dp->dp_start_off + dp->dp_len;
+ return !!dp->dp_len;
+}
+
+/*
+ * defrag a piece of a file
+ * error code is stored in di->di_defrag.df_status.
+ * returns:
+ * true -- whole file defrag done successfully.
+ * false -- not all done or error happened.
+ */
+
static bool xfs_defrag_file(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
{
- return true;
+ struct xfs_defrag *df = &(di->di_defrag);
+ struct xfs_inode *ip = di->di_ip;
+ bool ret = false;
+ int error;
+
+ xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ error = xfs_iread_extents(NULL, ip, XFS_DATA_FORK);
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ if (error) {
+ xfs_set_defrag_error(df, error);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* prevent further read/write/map/unmap/reflink/GC requests to this file */
+ if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL))
+ goto out;
+
+ if (!filemap_invalidate_trylock(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping)) {
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ inode_dio_wait(VFS_I(ip));
+ /*
+ * flush the whole file to get stable data/cow extents
+ */
+ error = filemap_write_and_wait(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping);
+ if (error) {
+ xfs_set_defrag_error(df, error);
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
+
+ xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IDEFRAG); //set after dirty pages get flushed
+ /* pick up next piece */
+ if (!xfs_pick_next_piece(di)) {
+ /* no more pieces to defrag, we are done */
+ ret = true;
+ goto clear_out;
+ }
+ df->df_blocks_done = di->di_next_blk;
+clear_out:
+ xfs_iflags_clear(ip, XFS_IDEFRAG);
+unlock_out:
+ filemap_invalidate_unlock(VFS_I(ip)->i_mapping);
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL);
+out:
+ di->di_last_process = jiffies;
+ return ret;
}
static inline bool xfs_defrag_suspended(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
@@ -266,7 +447,7 @@ static inline bool xfs_defrag_suspended(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
/* run as a separated process.
* defragment files in mp->m_defrag_list
*/
-int xfs_defrag_process(void *data)
+static int xfs_defrag_process(void *data)
{
unsigned long smallest_wait = ULONG_MAX;
struct xfs_mount *mp = data;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index 3beb470f1892..4f4e27cb9bbe 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ static inline bool xfs_inode_has_large_extent_counts(struct xfs_inode *ip)
/* Quotacheck is running but inode has not been added to quota counts. */
#define XFS_IQUOTAUNCHECKED (1 << 14)
+#define XFS_IDEFRAG (1 << 15) /* defrag in progress */
/*
* Remap in progress. Callers that wish to update file data while
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 98b7a7a8c42e..87497c4ca552 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -847,6 +847,11 @@ static inline void filemap_invalidate_lock(struct address_space *mapping)
down_write(&mapping->invalidate_lock);
}
+static inline int filemap_invalidate_trylock(struct address_space *mapping)
+{
+ return down_write_trylock(&mapping->invalidate_lock);
+}
+
static inline void filemap_invalidate_unlock(struct address_space *mapping)
{
up_write(&mapping->invalidate_lock);
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 7/9] xfs: defrag: guarantee contigurous blocks in cow fork
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: defrag: piece picking up Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: defrag: copy data from old blocks to new blocks Wengang Wang
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
Make sure there are contigurous blocks in cow fork covers the piece.
1. if the piece is covered, we are done
2. if the piece is partially overlap with existing extents in cow fork,
reclaim the overlap parts.
3. allocate exact piece size contigurous blocks skipping cow hint, fail out
if the allocation failed.
4. new blocks are stored in cow fork
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 4 ++
2 files changed, 161 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
index 3b90ba07c73a..3c86dd1f5cd4 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
@@ -379,6 +379,154 @@ static bool xfs_pick_next_piece(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
return !!dp->dp_len;
}
+/*
+ * check if the extent _imap_ covers the range specified by 'off_start'
+ * and 'length'.
+ * returns the following codes
+ */
+#define XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_NOOVERLAP 0 /* no overlap */
+#define XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_COVER 1 /* fully cover */
+#define XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_PARTIAL_COVER 2 /* partially cover */
+static int xfs_extent_cover_range(struct xfs_bmbt_irec *imap,
+ xfs_fileoff_t off_start,
+ xfs_fileoff_t length)
+{
+ if (off_start >= imap->br_startoff + imap->br_blockcount)
+ return XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_NOOVERLAP;
+
+ if (off_start + length <= imap->br_startoff)
+ return XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_NOOVERLAP;
+
+ if (imap->br_startoff <= off_start &&
+ imap->br_blockcount + imap->br_startoff - off_start >= length)
+ return XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_COVER;
+
+ return XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_PARTIAL_COVER;
+}
+
+/*
+ * make sure there is contiguous blocks to cover the given piece in cowfp.
+ * if there is already such an extent covering the piece, we are done.
+ * otherwise, we reclaim the non-contigurous blocks if there are, and allocate
+ * new contigurous blocks.
+ * parameters:
+ * dp --> [input] the piece
+ * icur --> [output] cow tree context
+ * imap --> [outout] the extent that covers the piece.
+ */
+static int xfs_guarantee_cow_extent(struct xfs_defrag_info *di,
+ struct xfs_iext_cursor *icur,
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec *imap)
+{
+#define XFS_DEFRAG_NO_ALLOC 0 /* Cow extent covers, no alloc */
+#define XFS_DEFRAG_ALLOC_NO_CANCEL 1 /* No Cow extents to cancel, alloc */
+#define XFS_DEFRAG_ALLOC_CANCEL 2 /* Cow extents to cancel, alloc */
+ struct xfs_inode *ip = di->di_ip;
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
+ struct xfs_defrag_piece *dp = &di->di_dp;
+ int need_alloc;
+ int nmap = 1;
+ unsigned int resblks;
+ int error;
+ struct xfs_trans *tp;
+
+ xfs_ifork_init_cow(ip);
+ if (!xfs_inode_has_cow_data(ip)) {
+ need_alloc = XFS_DEFRAG_ALLOC_NO_CANCEL;
+ } else if (!xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ip->i_cowfp, dp->dp_start_off,
+ icur, imap)) {
+ need_alloc = XFS_DEFRAG_ALLOC_NO_CANCEL;
+ } else {
+ int ret = xfs_extent_cover_range(imap, dp->dp_start_off, dp->dp_len);
+
+ if (ret == XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_COVER)
+ need_alloc = XFS_DEFRAG_NO_ALLOC;
+ else if (ret == XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_PARTIAL_COVER)
+ need_alloc = XFS_DEFRAG_ALLOC_CANCEL;
+ else // XFS_DEFRAG_IMAP_NOOVERLAP
+ need_alloc = XFS_DEFRAG_ALLOC_NO_CANCEL;
+ }
+
+ /* this piece is fully covered by exsting Cow extent, we are done */
+ if (need_alloc == XFS_DEFRAG_NO_ALLOC)
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * this piece is partially covered by existing Cow extent, reclaim the
+ * overlapping blocks
+ */
+ if (need_alloc == XFS_DEFRAG_ALLOC_CANCEL) {
+ /*
+ * reclaim overlap (but not covers) extents in a separated
+ * transaction
+ */
+ error = xfs_reflink_cancel_cow_range(ip,
+ XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, dp->dp_start_off),
+ XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, dp->dp_len), true);
+ if (error)
+ return error;
+ }
+
+ resblks = XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK) + dp->dp_len;
+ error = xfs_trans_alloc_inode(ip, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write,
+ resblks, 0, false, &tp);
+ if (error)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* now we have ILOCK_EXCL locked */
+ error = xfs_bmapi_write(tp, ip, dp->dp_start_off, dp->dp_len,
+ XFS_BMAPI_COWFORK | XFS_BMAPI_CONTIG, 0, imap, &nmap);
+ if (error)
+ goto cancel_out;
+
+ if (nmap == 0) {
+ error = -ENOSPC;
+ goto cancel_out;
+ }
+
+ error = xfs_trans_commit(tp);
+ if (error)
+ goto unlock_out;
+
+ xfs_iext_lookup_extent(ip, ip->i_cowfp, dp->dp_start_off, icur, imap);
+
+ /* new extent can be merged into existing extent(s) though it's rare */
+ ASSERT(imap->br_blockcount >= dp->dp_len);
+ goto unlock_out;
+
+cancel_out:
+ xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
+unlock_out:
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+out:
+ return error;
+}
+
+/* defrag on the given piece
+ * XFS_ILOCK_EXCL is held by caller
+ */
+static int xfs_defrag_file_piece(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
+{
+ struct xfs_inode *ip = di->di_ip;
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec imap;
+ int error;
+ struct xfs_iext_cursor icur;
+
+ if (xfs_is_shutdown(ip->i_mount)) {
+ error = -EIO;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* allocate contig new blocks to Cow fork */
+ error = xfs_guarantee_cow_extent(di, &icur, &imap);
+ if (error)
+ goto out;
+
+ ASSERT(imap.br_blockcount >= di->di_dp.dp_len);
+out:
+ return error;
+}
+
/*
* defrag a piece of a file
* error code is stored in di->di_defrag.df_status.
@@ -428,6 +576,14 @@ static bool xfs_defrag_file(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
ret = true;
goto clear_out;
}
+
+ if (di->di_dp.dp_nr_ext > 1) {
+ /* defrag the piece */
+ error = xfs_defrag_file_piece(di);
+ if (error)
+ xfs_set_defrag_error(df, error);
+ }
+
df->df_blocks_done = di->di_next_blk;
clear_out:
xfs_iflags_clear(ip, XFS_IDEFRAG);
@@ -536,6 +692,7 @@ static int xfs_defrag_process(void *data)
}
+ /* unmount in progress, clean up the defrags */
clean_up_defrags(mp);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index c0f1c89786c2..e0e319847f7d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -82,6 +82,10 @@ xfs_get_cowextsz_hint(
{
xfs_extlen_t a, b;
+ /* defrag need exact required size and skip the hint */
+ if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IDEFRAG))
+ return 0;
+
a = 0;
if (ip->i_diflags2 & XFS_DIFLAG2_COWEXTSIZE)
a = ip->i_cowextsize;
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 8/9] xfs: defrag: copy data from old blocks to new blocks
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: defrag: guarantee contigurous blocks in cow fork Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: defrag: map " Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 21:35 ` [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Darrick J. Wong
9 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
copy data from old blocks to new blocks synchronously
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
index 3c86dd1f5cd4..0375b542024e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
@@ -502,6 +502,57 @@ static int xfs_guarantee_cow_extent(struct xfs_defrag_info *di,
return error;
}
+static int xfs_do_copy_extent_sync(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_fsblock_t src_blk,
+ xfs_fsblock_t tgt_blk, xfs_filblks_t count)
+{
+ struct xfs_buf *bp = NULL;
+ xfs_daddr_t src_daddr, tgt_daddr;
+ size_t nblocks;
+ int error;
+
+ src_daddr = XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp, src_blk);
+ tgt_daddr = XFS_FSB_TO_DADDR(mp, tgt_blk);
+ nblocks = XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, count);
+
+ error = xfs_buf_read_uncached(mp->m_ddev_targp, src_daddr, nblocks, 0, &bp, NULL);
+ if (error)
+ goto rel_bp;
+
+ /* write to new blocks */
+ bp->b_maps[0].bm_bn = tgt_daddr;
+ error = xfs_bwrite(bp);
+rel_bp:
+ if (bp)
+ xfs_buf_relse(bp);
+ return error;
+}
+
+/* Physically copy data from old extents to new extents synchronously
+ * Note: @new extent is expected either exact same as piece size or it's bigger
+ * than that.
+ */
+static int xfs_defrag_copy_piece_sync(struct xfs_defrag_info *di,
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec *new)
+{
+ struct xfs_defrag_piece *dp = &di->di_dp;
+ xfs_fsblock_t new_strt_blk;
+ int error = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ new_strt_blk = new->br_startblock + dp->dp_start_off - new->br_startoff;
+ for (i = 0; i < dp->dp_nr_ext; i++) {
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec = &dp->dp_extents[i];
+
+ error = xfs_do_copy_extent_sync(di->di_ip->i_mount,
+ irec->br_startblock, new_strt_blk,
+ irec->br_blockcount);
+ if (error)
+ break;
+ new_strt_blk += irec->br_blockcount;
+ }
+ return error;
+}
+
/* defrag on the given piece
* XFS_ILOCK_EXCL is held by caller
*/
@@ -523,6 +574,11 @@ static int xfs_defrag_file_piece(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
goto out;
ASSERT(imap.br_blockcount >= di->di_dp.dp_len);
+
+ /* copy data to new blocks */
+ error = xfs_defrag_copy_piece_sync(di, &imap);
+ if (error)
+ goto out;
out:
return error;
}
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 9/9] xfs: defrag: map new blocks
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: defrag: copy data from old blocks to new blocks Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 17:05 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 21:35 ` [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Darrick J. Wong
9 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw
To: linux-xfs; +Cc: wen.gang.wang
Unmap original extents.
Drop refcounter for shared blocks; free not shared ones.
Fre Cow orphon record.
map new blocks to data fork and remove them from cow fork.
copy data from old blocks to new blocks synchronously
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 7 ++-
fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h | 3 +-
5 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
index 731260a5af6d..09053c0abe28 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ xfs_getbmap_report_one(
bool shared = false;
int error;
- error = xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(ip, got, &shared);
+ error = xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(ip, got, &shared, NULL);
if (error)
return error;
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
index 0375b542024e..6867f81783a0 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
@@ -553,13 +553,102 @@ static int xfs_defrag_copy_piece_sync(struct xfs_defrag_info *di,
return error;
}
+/* caller makes sure both irec1 and irec2 are real ones. */
+static int compare_bmbt_by_fsb(const void *a, const void *b)
+{
+ const struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec1 = a, *irec2 = b;
+
+ return irec1->br_startblock > irec2->br_startblock ? 1 : -1;
+}
+
+/* sort the extents in dp_extents to be in fsb order, low to high */
+static void xfs_sort_piece_exts_by_fsb(struct xfs_defrag_piece *dp)
+{
+ sort(dp->dp_extents, dp->dp_nr_ext, sizeof(struct xfs_bmbt_irec),
+ compare_bmbt_by_fsb, NULL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * unmap the given extent from inode
+ * free non-shared blocks and decrease shared counter for shared ones.
+ */
+static int xfs_defrag_unmap_ext(struct xfs_inode *ip,
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec,
+ struct xfs_trans *tp)
+{
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec unmap = *irec; /* don't update original extent */
+ xfs_fsblock_t irec_end = irec->br_startblock + irec->br_blockcount;
+ int error = 0;
+
+ while (unmap.br_startblock < irec_end) {
+ bool shared;
+
+ error = xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(ip, &unmap, &shared, tp);
+ if (error)
+ goto out;
+
+ /* unmap blocks from data fork */
+ xfs_bmap_unmap_extent(tp, ip, &unmap);
+ /*
+ * decrease refcount counter for shared blocks, or free the
+ * non-shared blocks
+ */
+ if (shared) {
+ xfs_refcount_decrease_extent(tp, &unmap);
+ } else {
+ ASSERT(unmap.br_state != XFS_EXT_UNWRITTEN);
+ __xfs_free_extent_later(tp, unmap.br_startblock,
+ unmap.br_blockcount, NULL, 0, false);
+ }
+ xfs_trans_mod_dquot_byino(tp, ip, XFS_TRANS_DQ_BCOUNT,
+ -unmap.br_blockcount);
+
+ /* for next */
+ unmap.br_startoff += unmap.br_blockcount;
+ unmap.br_startblock += unmap.br_blockcount;
+ unmap.br_blockcount = irec_end - unmap.br_startblock;
+ }
+out:
+ return error;
+}
+
+/*
+ * unmap original extents in this piece
+ * for those non-shared ones, also free them; for shared, decrease refcount
+ * counter.
+ * XFS_ILOCK_EXCL is locked by caller.
+ */
+static int xfs_defrag_unmap_piece(struct xfs_defrag_info *di, struct xfs_trans *tp)
+{
+ struct xfs_defrag_piece *dp = &di->di_dp;
+ xfs_fsblock_t last_fsb = 0;
+ int i, error;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < dp->dp_nr_ext; i++) {
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec = &dp->dp_extents[i];
+
+ /* debug only, remove the following two lines for production use */
+ ASSERT(last_fsb == 0 || irec->br_startblock > last_fsb);
+ last_fsb = irec->br_startblock;
+
+ error = xfs_defrag_unmap_ext(di->di_ip, irec, tp);
+ if (error)
+ break;
+ }
+ return error;
+}
+
/* defrag on the given piece
* XFS_ILOCK_EXCL is held by caller
*/
static int xfs_defrag_file_piece(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
{
struct xfs_inode *ip = di->di_ip;
- struct xfs_bmbt_irec imap;
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
+ struct xfs_trans *tp = NULL;
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec imap, del;
+ unsigned int resblks;
+
int error;
struct xfs_iext_cursor icur;
@@ -579,6 +668,55 @@ static int xfs_defrag_file_piece(struct xfs_defrag_info *di)
error = xfs_defrag_copy_piece_sync(di, &imap);
if (error)
goto out;
+
+ /* sort the extents by FSB, low -> high, for later unmapping*/
+ xfs_sort_piece_exts_by_fsb(&di->di_dp);
+
+ resblks = XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK);
+ error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write, resblks, 0,
+ XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);
+ if (error)
+ goto out;
+
+ xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+ xfs_trans_ijoin(tp, ip, 0);
+
+ /* unmap original extents in data fork */
+ error = xfs_defrag_unmap_piece(di, tp);
+ if (error) {
+ xfs_trans_cancel(tp);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* adjust new blocks to proper range */
+ del = imap;
+ if (del.br_blockcount > di->di_dp.dp_len) {
+ xfs_filblks_t diff = di->di_dp.dp_start_off - del.br_startoff;
+
+ del.br_startoff += diff;
+ del.br_startblock += diff;
+ del.br_blockcount = di->di_dp.dp_len;
+ }
+
+ /* Free the CoW orphan record. */
+ xfs_refcount_free_cow_extent(tp, del.br_startblock, del.br_blockcount);
+
+ /* map the adjusted new blocks to data fork */
+ xfs_bmap_map_extent(tp, ip, &del);
+
+ /* Charge this new data fork mapping to the on-disk quota. */
+ xfs_trans_mod_dquot_byino(tp, ip, XFS_TRANS_DQ_DELBCOUNT,
+ (long)del.br_blockcount);
+
+ /* remove the extent from Cow fork */
+ xfs_bmap_del_extent_cow(ip, &icur, &imap, &del);
+
+ /* modify inode change time */
+ xfs_trans_ichgtime(tp, ip, XFS_ICHGTIME_CHG);
+
+ error = xfs_trans_commit(tp);
+ xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
+
out:
return error;
}
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
index 18c8f168b153..f6fdff3bdca4 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
@@ -1256,7 +1256,7 @@ xfs_read_iomap_begin(
error = xfs_bmapi_read(ip, offset_fsb, end_fsb - offset_fsb, &imap,
&nimaps, 0);
if (!error && ((flags & IOMAP_REPORT) || IS_DAX(inode)))
- error = xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(ip, &imap, &shared);
+ error = xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(ip, &imap, &shared, NULL);
seq = xfs_iomap_inode_sequence(ip, shared ? IOMAP_F_SHARED : 0);
xfs_iunlock(ip, lockmode);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
index e5b62dc28466..7d7d67087fcc 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
@@ -168,7 +168,8 @@ int
xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(
struct xfs_inode *ip,
struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec,
- bool *shared)
+ bool *shared,
+ struct xfs_trans *tp)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
struct xfs_perag *pag;
@@ -190,7 +191,7 @@ xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(
agbno = XFS_FSB_TO_AGBNO(mp, irec->br_startblock);
aglen = irec->br_blockcount;
- error = xfs_reflink_find_shared(pag, NULL, agbno, aglen, &fbno, &flen,
+ error = xfs_reflink_find_shared(pag, tp, agbno, aglen, &fbno, &flen,
true);
xfs_perag_put(pag);
if (error)
@@ -238,7 +239,7 @@ xfs_bmap_trim_cow(
}
/* Trim the mapping to the nearest shared extent boundary. */
- return xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(ip, imap, shared);
+ return xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(ip, imap, shared, NULL);
}
static int
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h
index 65c5dfe17ecf..d751420650f2 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h
@@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ static inline bool xfs_is_cow_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip)
}
extern int xfs_reflink_trim_around_shared(struct xfs_inode *ip,
- struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec, bool *shared);
+ struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec, bool *shared,
+ struct xfs_trans *tp);
int xfs_bmap_trim_cow(struct xfs_inode *ip, struct xfs_bmbt_irec *imap,
bool *shared);
--
2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: defrag: map " Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-14 21:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-15 3:15 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-15 4:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
9 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2023-12-14 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Wengang Wang; +Cc: linux-xfs
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 09:05:21AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
> Background:
> We have the existing xfs_fsr tool which do defragment for files. It has the
> following features:
> 1. Defragment is implemented by file copying.
> 2. The copy (to a temporary file) is exclusive. The source file is locked
> during the copy (to a temporary file) and all IO requests are blocked
> before the copy is done.
> 3. The copy could take long time for huge files with IO blocked.
> 4. The copy requires as many free blocks as the source file has.
> If the source is huge, say it’s 1TiB, it’s hard to require the file
> system to have another 1TiB free.
>
> The use case in concern is that the XFS files are used as images files for
> Virtual Machines.
> 1. The image files are huge, they can reach hundreds of GiB and even to TiB.
> 2. Backups are made via reflink copies, and CoW makes the files badly fragmented.
> 3. fragmentation make reflink copies super slow.
> 4. during the reflink copy, all IO requests to the file are blocked for super
> long time. That makes timeout in VM and the timeout lead to disaster.
>
> This feature aims to:
> 1. reduce the file fragmentation making future reflink (much) faster and
> 2. at the same time, defragmentation works in non-exclusive manner, it doesn’t
> block file IOs long.
>
> Non-exclusive defragment
> Here we are introducing the non-exclusive manner to defragment a file,
> especially for huge files, without blocking IO to it long. Non-exclusive
> defragmentation divides the whole file into small pieces. For each piece,
> we lock the file, defragment the piece and unlock the file. Defragmenting
> the small piece doesn’t take long. File IO requests can get served between
> pieces before blocked long. Also we put (user adjustable) idle time between
> defragmenting two consecutive pieces to balance the defragmentation and file IOs.
> So though the defragmentation could take longer than xfs_fsr, it balances
> defragmentation and file IOs.
I'm kinda surprised you don't just turn on alwayscow mode, use an
iomap_funshare-like function to read in and dirty pagecache (which will
hopefully create a new large cow fork mapping) and then flush it all
back out with writeback. Then you don't need all this state tracking,
kthreads management, and copying file data through the buffer cache.
Wouldn't that be a lot simpler?
--D
> Operation target
> The operation targets are files in XFS filesystem
>
> User interface
> A fresh new command xfs_defrag is provided. User can
> start/stop/suspend/resume/get-status the defragmentation against a file.
> With xfs_defrag command user can specify:
> 1. target extent size, extents under which are defragment target extents.
> 2. piece size, the whole file are divided into piece according to the piece size.
> 3. idle time, the idle time between defragmenting two adjacent pieces.
>
> Piece
> Piece is the smallest unit that we do defragmentation. A piece contains a range
> of contiguous file blocks, it may contain one or more extents.
>
> Target Extent Size
> This is a configuration value in blocks indicating which extents are
> defragmentation targets. Extents which are larger than this value are the Target
> Extents. When a piece contains two or more Target Extents, the piece is a Target
> Piece. Defragmenting a piece requires at least 2 x TES free file system contiguous
> blocks. In case TES is set too big, the defragmentation could fail to allocate
> that many contiguous file system blocks. By default it’s 64 blocks.
>
> Piece Size
> This is a configuration value indicating the size of the piece in blocks, a piece
> is no larger than this size. Defragmenting a piece requires up to PS free
> filesystem contiguous blocks. In case PS is set too big, the defragmentation could
> fail to allocate that many contiguous file system blocks. 4096 blocks by default,
> and 4096 blocks as maximum.
>
> Error reporting
> When the defragmentation fails (usually due to file system block allocation
> failure), the error will return to user application when the application fetches
> the defragmentation status.
>
> Idle Time
> Idle time is a configuration value, it is the time defragmentation would idle
> between defragmenting two adjacent pieces. We have no limitation on IT.
>
> Some test result:
> 50GiB file with 2013990 extents, average 6.5 blocks per extent.
> Relink copy used 40s (then reflink copy removed before following tests)
> Use above as block device in VM, creating XFS v5 on that VM block device.
> Mount and build kernel from VM (buffered writes + fsync to backed image file) without defrag: 13m39.497s
> Kernel build from VM (buffered writes + sync) with defrag (target extent = 256,
> piece size = 4096, idle time = 1000 ms): 15m1.183s
> Defrag used: 123m27.354s
>
> Wengang Wang (9):
> xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers.
> xfs: defrag: initialization and cleanup
> xfs: defrag implement stop/suspend/resume/status
> xfs: defrag: allocate/cleanup defragmentation
> xfs: defrag: process some cases in xfs_defrag_process
> xfs: defrag: piece picking up
> xfs: defrag: guarantee contigurous blocks in cow fork
> xfs: defrag: copy data from old blocks to new blocks
> xfs: defrag: map new blocks
>
> fs/xfs/Makefile | 1 +
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_fs.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c | 1074 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.h | 11 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 4 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h | 1 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_ioctl.c | 17 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 2 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 3 +
> fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h | 37 ++
> fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c | 7 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.h | 3 +-
> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 3 +
> include/linux/fs.h | 5 +
> 15 files changed, 1165 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
> create mode 100644 fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.h
>
> --
> 2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-14 21:35 ` [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Darrick J. Wong
@ 2023-12-15 3:15 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-15 17:07 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 4:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2023-12-15 3:15 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Wengang Wang, linux-xfs
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:35:02PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 09:05:21AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
> > Background:
> > We have the existing xfs_fsr tool which do defragment for files. It has the
> > following features:
> > 1. Defragment is implemented by file copying.
> > 2. The copy (to a temporary file) is exclusive. The source file is locked
> > during the copy (to a temporary file) and all IO requests are blocked
> > before the copy is done.
> > 3. The copy could take long time for huge files with IO blocked.
> > 4. The copy requires as many free blocks as the source file has.
> > If the source is huge, say it’s 1TiB, it’s hard to require the file
> > system to have another 1TiB free.
> >
> > The use case in concern is that the XFS files are used as images files for
> > Virtual Machines.
> > 1. The image files are huge, they can reach hundreds of GiB and even to TiB.
> > 2. Backups are made via reflink copies, and CoW makes the files badly fragmented.
> > 3. fragmentation make reflink copies super slow.
> > 4. during the reflink copy, all IO requests to the file are blocked for super
> > long time. That makes timeout in VM and the timeout lead to disaster.
> >
> > This feature aims to:
> > 1. reduce the file fragmentation making future reflink (much) faster and
> > 2. at the same time, defragmentation works in non-exclusive manner, it doesn’t
> > block file IOs long.
> >
> > Non-exclusive defragment
> > Here we are introducing the non-exclusive manner to defragment a file,
> > especially for huge files, without blocking IO to it long. Non-exclusive
> > defragmentation divides the whole file into small pieces. For each piece,
> > we lock the file, defragment the piece and unlock the file. Defragmenting
> > the small piece doesn’t take long. File IO requests can get served between
> > pieces before blocked long. Also we put (user adjustable) idle time between
> > defragmenting two consecutive pieces to balance the defragmentation and file IOs.
> > So though the defragmentation could take longer than xfs_fsr, it balances
> > defragmentation and file IOs.
>
> I'm kinda surprised you don't just turn on alwayscow mode, use an
> iomap_funshare-like function to read in and dirty pagecache (which will
> hopefully create a new large cow fork mapping) and then flush it all
> back out with writeback. Then you don't need all this state tracking,
> kthreads management, and copying file data through the buffer cache.
> Wouldn't that be a lot simpler?
Hmmm. I don't think it needs any kernel code to be written at all.
I think we can do atomic section-by-section, crash-safe active file
defrag from userspace like this:
scratch_fd = open(O_TMPFILE);
defrag_fd = open("file-to-be-dfragged");
while (offset < target_size) {
/*
* share a range of the file to be defragged into
* the scratch file.
*/
args.src_fd = defrag_fd;
args.src_offset = offset;
args.src_len = length;
args.dst_offset = offset;
ioctl(scratch_fd, FICLONERANGE, args);
/*
* For the shared range to be unshared via a
* copy-on-write operation in the file to be
* defragged. This causes the file needing to be
* defragged to have new extents allocated and the
* data to be copied over and written out.
*/
fallocate(defrag_fd, FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE, offset, length);
fdatasync(defrag_fd);
/*
* Punch out the original extents we shared to the
* scratch file so they are returned to free space.
*/
fallocate(scratch_fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH, offset, length);
/* move onto next region */
offset += length;
};
As long as the length is large enough for the unshare to create a
large contiguous delalloc region for the COW, I think this would
likely acheive the desired "non-exclusive" defrag requirement.
If we were to implement this as, say, and xfs_spaceman operation
then all the user controlled policy bits (like inter chunk delays,
chunk sizes, etc) then just becomes command line parameters for the
defrag command...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-14 21:35 ` [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-15 3:15 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2023-12-15 4:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-15 16:48 ` Wengang Wang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2023-12-15 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Wengang Wang, linux-xfs
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:35:02PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> I'm kinda surprised you don't just turn on alwayscow mode, use an
> iomap_funshare-like function to read in and dirty pagecache (which will
> hopefully create a new large cow fork mapping) and then flush it all
> back out with writeback. Then you don't need all this state tracking,
> kthreads management, and copying file data through the buffer cache.
> Wouldn't that be a lot simpler?
Yes, although with a caveat or two.
We did that for the zoned XFS project, where a 'defragmentation' like
this which we call garbage collection is an essential part of the
operation to free entire zones. I ended up initially implementing it
using iomap_file_unshare as that is page cache coherent and a nicely
available library function. But it turns out iomap_file_unshare sucks
badly as it will read the data sychronously one block at a time.
I ended up coming up with my own duplication of iomap_file_unshare
that doesn't do it which is a bit hack by solves this problem.
I'd love to eventually merge it back into iomap_file_unshare, for
which we really need to work on our writeback iterators.
The relevant commit or the new helper is here:
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/xfs.git/commitdiff/cc4a639e3052fefb385f63a0db5dfe07db4e9d58
which also need a hacky readahead helper:
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/xfs.git/commitdiff/f6d545fc00300ddfd3e297d17e4f229ad2f15c3e
The code using this for zoned GC is here:
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/xfs.git/blob/refs/heads/xfs-zoned:/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c#l764
It probably would make sense to be able to also use this for a regular
fs for the online defrag use case, although the wire up would be a bit
different.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers.
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-15 5:35 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-12-15 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Wengang Wang, linux-xfs; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all, wen.gang.wang
Hi Wengang,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v6.7-rc5 next-20231214]
[cannot apply to xfs-linux/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wengang-Wang/xfs-defrag-introduce-strucutures-and-numbers/20231215-011549
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214170530.8664-2-wen.gang.wang%40oracle.com
patch subject: [PATCH 1/9] xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers.
config: loongarch-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231215/202312151311.w1V2863m-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231215/202312151311.w1V2863m-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312151311.w1V2863m-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c:57:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'xfs_file_defrag' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
57 | int xfs_file_defrag(struct file *filp, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/xfs_file_defrag +57 fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
56
> 57 int xfs_file_defrag(struct file *filp, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: defrag: initialization and cleanup
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: defrag: initialization and cleanup Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-15 14:09 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-12-15 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Wengang Wang, linux-xfs; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all, wen.gang.wang
Hi Wengang,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v6.7-rc5 next-20231215]
[cannot apply to xfs-linux/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wengang-Wang/xfs-defrag-introduce-strucutures-and-numbers/20231215-011549
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214170530.8664-3-wen.gang.wang%40oracle.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: defrag: initialization and cleanup
config: loongarch-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231215/202312152127.vB6dhbqO-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231215/202312152127.vB6dhbqO-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312152127.vB6dhbqO-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c:58:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'xfs_initialize_defrag' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
58 | void xfs_initialize_defrag(struct xfs_mount *mp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c:67:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'xfs_stop_wait_defrags' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
67 | void xfs_stop_wait_defrags(struct xfs_mount *mp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c:80:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'xfs_file_defrag' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
80 | int xfs_file_defrag(struct file *filp, struct xfs_defrag *defrag)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/xfs_initialize_defrag +58 fs/xfs/xfs_defrag.c
56
57 /* initialization called for new mount */
> 58 void xfs_initialize_defrag(struct xfs_mount *mp)
59 {
60 sema_init(&mp->m_defrag_lock, 1);
61 mp->m_nr_defrag = 0;
62 mp->m_defrag_task = NULL;
63 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mp->m_defrag_list);
64 }
65
66 /* stop all the defragmentations on this mount and wait until they really stopped */
> 67 void xfs_stop_wait_defrags(struct xfs_mount *mp)
68 {
69 down(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
70 if (list_empty(&mp->m_defrag_list)) {
71 up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
72 return;
73 }
74 ASSERT(mp->m_defrag_task);
75 up(&mp->m_defrag_lock);
76 kthread_stop(mp->m_defrag_task);
77 mp->m_defrag_task = NULL;
78 }
79
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-15 4:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2023-12-15 16:48 ` Wengang Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-15 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Thanks Darrick and Christoph for such a quick look at this!
Yes, iomap_funshare sounds more interesting. I will look into it.
Wengang
> On Dec 14, 2023, at 8:06 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:35:02PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> I'm kinda surprised you don't just turn on alwayscow mode, use an
>> iomap_funshare-like function to read in and dirty pagecache (which will
>> hopefully create a new large cow fork mapping) and then flush it all
>> back out with writeback. Then you don't need all this state tracking,
>> kthreads management, and copying file data through the buffer cache.
>> Wouldn't that be a lot simpler?
>
> Yes, although with a caveat or two.
>
> We did that for the zoned XFS project, where a 'defragmentation' like
> this which we call garbage collection is an essential part of the
> operation to free entire zones. I ended up initially implementing it
> using iomap_file_unshare as that is page cache coherent and a nicely
> available library function. But it turns out iomap_file_unshare sucks
> badly as it will read the data sychronously one block at a time.
>
> I ended up coming up with my own duplication of iomap_file_unshare
> that doesn't do it which is a bit hack by solves this problem.
> I'd love to eventually merge it back into iomap_file_unshare, for
> which we really need to work on our writeback iterators.
>
> The relevant commit or the new helper is here:
>
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/xfs.git/commitdiff/cc4a639e3052fefb385f63a0db5dfe07db4e9d58
>
> which also need a hacky readahead helper:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/xfs.git/commitdiff/f6d545fc00300ddfd3e297d17e4f229ad2f15c3e
>
> The code using this for zoned GC is here:
>
> http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/xfs.git/blob/refs/heads/xfs-zoned:/fs/xfs/xfs_zone_alloc.c#l764
>
> It probably would make sense to be able to also use this for a regular
> fs for the online defrag use case, although the wire up would be a bit
> different.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-15 3:15 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2023-12-15 17:07 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 17:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-15 20:20 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-15 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
> On Dec 14, 2023, at 7:15 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:35:02PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 09:05:21AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>>> Background:
>>> We have the existing xfs_fsr tool which do defragment for files. It has the
>>> following features:
>>> 1. Defragment is implemented by file copying.
>>> 2. The copy (to a temporary file) is exclusive. The source file is locked
>>> during the copy (to a temporary file) and all IO requests are blocked
>>> before the copy is done.
>>> 3. The copy could take long time for huge files with IO blocked.
>>> 4. The copy requires as many free blocks as the source file has.
>>> If the source is huge, say it’s 1TiB, it’s hard to require the file
>>> system to have another 1TiB free.
>>>
>>> The use case in concern is that the XFS files are used as images files for
>>> Virtual Machines.
>>> 1. The image files are huge, they can reach hundreds of GiB and even to TiB.
>>> 2. Backups are made via reflink copies, and CoW makes the files badly fragmented.
>>> 3. fragmentation make reflink copies super slow.
>>> 4. during the reflink copy, all IO requests to the file are blocked for super
>>> long time. That makes timeout in VM and the timeout lead to disaster.
>>>
>>> This feature aims to:
>>> 1. reduce the file fragmentation making future reflink (much) faster and
>>> 2. at the same time, defragmentation works in non-exclusive manner, it doesn’t
>>> block file IOs long.
>>>
>>> Non-exclusive defragment
>>> Here we are introducing the non-exclusive manner to defragment a file,
>>> especially for huge files, without blocking IO to it long. Non-exclusive
>>> defragmentation divides the whole file into small pieces. For each piece,
>>> we lock the file, defragment the piece and unlock the file. Defragmenting
>>> the small piece doesn’t take long. File IO requests can get served between
>>> pieces before blocked long. Also we put (user adjustable) idle time between
>>> defragmenting two consecutive pieces to balance the defragmentation and file IOs.
>>> So though the defragmentation could take longer than xfs_fsr, it balances
>>> defragmentation and file IOs.
>>
>> I'm kinda surprised you don't just turn on alwayscow mode, use an
>> iomap_funshare-like function to read in and dirty pagecache (which will
>> hopefully create a new large cow fork mapping) and then flush it all
>> back out with writeback. Then you don't need all this state tracking,
>> kthreads management, and copying file data through the buffer cache.
>> Wouldn't that be a lot simpler?
>
> Hmmm. I don't think it needs any kernel code to be written at all.
> I think we can do atomic section-by-section, crash-safe active file
> defrag from userspace like this:
>
> scratch_fd = open(O_TMPFILE);
> defrag_fd = open("file-to-be-dfragged");
>
> while (offset < target_size) {
>
> /*
> * share a range of the file to be defragged into
> * the scratch file.
> */
> args.src_fd = defrag_fd;
> args.src_offset = offset;
> args.src_len = length;
> args.dst_offset = offset;
> ioctl(scratch_fd, FICLONERANGE, args);
>
> /*
> * For the shared range to be unshared via a
> * copy-on-write operation in the file to be
> * defragged. This causes the file needing to be
> * defragged to have new extents allocated and the
> * data to be copied over and written out.
> */
> fallocate(defrag_fd, FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE, offset, length);
> fdatasync(defrag_fd);
>
> /*
> * Punch out the original extents we shared to the
> * scratch file so they are returned to free space.
> */
> fallocate(scratch_fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH, offset, length);
>
> /* move onto next region */
> offset += length;
> };
>
> As long as the length is large enough for the unshare to create a
> large contiguous delalloc region for the COW, I think this would
> likely acheive the desired "non-exclusive" defrag requirement.
>
> If we were to implement this as, say, and xfs_spaceman operation
> then all the user controlled policy bits (like inter chunk delays,
> chunk sizes, etc) then just becomes command line parameters for the
> defrag command...
Ha, the idea from user space is very interesting!
So far I have the following thoughts:
1). If the FICLONERANGE/FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE/FALLOC_FL_PUNCH works on a FS without reflink
enabled.
2). What if there is a big hole in the file to be defragmented? Will it cause block allocation and writing blocks with
zeroes.
3). In case a big range of the file is good (not much fragmented), the ‘defrag’ on that range is not necessary.
4). The use space defrag can’t use a try-lock mode to make IO requests have priorities. I am not sure if this is very important.
Maybe we can work with xfs_bmap to get extents info and skip good extents and holes to help case 2) and 3).
I will figure above out.
Again, the idea is so amazing, I didn’t reallize it.
Thanks,
Wengang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-15 17:07 ` Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-15 17:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-15 20:03 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 20:20 ` Dave Chinner
1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2023-12-15 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Wengang Wang; +Cc: Dave Chinner, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 05:07:36PM +0000, Wengang Wang wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 2023, at 7:15 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:35:02PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 09:05:21AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
> >>> Background:
> >>> We have the existing xfs_fsr tool which do defragment for files. It has the
> >>> following features:
> >>> 1. Defragment is implemented by file copying.
> >>> 2. The copy (to a temporary file) is exclusive. The source file is locked
> >>> during the copy (to a temporary file) and all IO requests are blocked
> >>> before the copy is done.
> >>> 3. The copy could take long time for huge files with IO blocked.
> >>> 4. The copy requires as many free blocks as the source file has.
> >>> If the source is huge, say it’s 1TiB, it’s hard to require the file
> >>> system to have another 1TiB free.
> >>>
> >>> The use case in concern is that the XFS files are used as images files for
> >>> Virtual Machines.
> >>> 1. The image files are huge, they can reach hundreds of GiB and even to TiB.
> >>> 2. Backups are made via reflink copies, and CoW makes the files badly fragmented.
> >>> 3. fragmentation make reflink copies super slow.
> >>> 4. during the reflink copy, all IO requests to the file are blocked for super
> >>> long time. That makes timeout in VM and the timeout lead to disaster.
> >>>
> >>> This feature aims to:
> >>> 1. reduce the file fragmentation making future reflink (much) faster and
> >>> 2. at the same time, defragmentation works in non-exclusive manner, it doesn’t
> >>> block file IOs long.
> >>>
> >>> Non-exclusive defragment
> >>> Here we are introducing the non-exclusive manner to defragment a file,
> >>> especially for huge files, without blocking IO to it long. Non-exclusive
> >>> defragmentation divides the whole file into small pieces. For each piece,
> >>> we lock the file, defragment the piece and unlock the file. Defragmenting
> >>> the small piece doesn’t take long. File IO requests can get served between
> >>> pieces before blocked long. Also we put (user adjustable) idle time between
> >>> defragmenting two consecutive pieces to balance the defragmentation and file IOs.
> >>> So though the defragmentation could take longer than xfs_fsr, it balances
> >>> defragmentation and file IOs.
> >>
> >> I'm kinda surprised you don't just turn on alwayscow mode, use an
> >> iomap_funshare-like function to read in and dirty pagecache (which will
> >> hopefully create a new large cow fork mapping) and then flush it all
> >> back out with writeback. Then you don't need all this state tracking,
> >> kthreads management, and copying file data through the buffer cache.
> >> Wouldn't that be a lot simpler?
> >
> > Hmmm. I don't think it needs any kernel code to be written at all.
> > I think we can do atomic section-by-section, crash-safe active file
> > defrag from userspace like this:
> >
> > scratch_fd = open(O_TMPFILE);
> > defrag_fd = open("file-to-be-dfragged");
> >
> > while (offset < target_size) {
> >
> > /*
> > * share a range of the file to be defragged into
> > * the scratch file.
> > */
> > args.src_fd = defrag_fd;
> > args.src_offset = offset;
> > args.src_len = length;
> > args.dst_offset = offset;
> > ioctl(scratch_fd, FICLONERANGE, args);
> >
> > /*
> > * For the shared range to be unshared via a
> > * copy-on-write operation in the file to be
> > * defragged. This causes the file needing to be
> > * defragged to have new extents allocated and the
> > * data to be copied over and written out.
> > */
> > fallocate(defrag_fd, FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE, offset, length);
> > fdatasync(defrag_fd);
> >
> > /*
> > * Punch out the original extents we shared to the
> > * scratch file so they are returned to free space.
> > */
> > fallocate(scratch_fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH, offset, length);
You could even set args.dst_offset = 0 and ftruncate here.
But yes, this is a better suggestion than adding more kernel code.
> > /* move onto next region */
> > offset += length;
> > };
> >
> > As long as the length is large enough for the unshare to create a
> > large contiguous delalloc region for the COW, I think this would
> > likely acheive the desired "non-exclusive" defrag requirement.
> >
> > If we were to implement this as, say, and xfs_spaceman operation
> > then all the user controlled policy bits (like inter chunk delays,
> > chunk sizes, etc) then just becomes command line parameters for the
> > defrag command...
>
>
> Ha, the idea from user space is very interesting!
> So far I have the following thoughts:
> 1). If the FICLONERANGE/FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE/FALLOC_FL_PUNCH works
> on a FS without reflink enabled.
It does not.
That said, for your usecase (reflinked vm disk images that fragment over
time) that won't be an issue. For non-reflink filesystems, there's
fewer chances for extreme fragmentation due to the lack of COW.
> 2). What if there is a big hole in the file to be defragmented? Will
> it cause block allocation and writing blocks with zeroes.
FUNSHARE ignores holes.
> 3). In case a big range of the file is good (not much fragmented), the
> ‘defrag’ on that range is not necessary.
Yep, so you'd have to check the bmap/fiemap output first to identify
areas that are more fragmented than you'd like.
> 4). The use space defrag can’t use a try-lock mode to make IO requests
> have priorities. I am not sure if this is very important.
>
> Maybe we can work with xfs_bmap to get extents info and skip good
> extents and holes to help case 2) and 3).
Yeah, that sounds necessary.
--D
> I will figure above out.
> Again, the idea is so amazing, I didn’t reallize it.
>
> Thanks,
> Wengang
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-15 17:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2023-12-15 20:03 ` Wengang Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-15 20:03 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Darrick J. Wong; +Cc: Dave Chinner, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
> On Dec 15, 2023, at 9:30 AM, Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 05:07:36PM +0000, Wengang Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 14, 2023, at 7:15 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:35:02PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 09:05:21AM -0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
>>>>> Background:
>>>>> We have the existing xfs_fsr tool which do defragment for files. It has the
>>>>> following features:
>>>>> 1. Defragment is implemented by file copying.
>>>>> 2. The copy (to a temporary file) is exclusive. The source file is locked
>>>>> during the copy (to a temporary file) and all IO requests are blocked
>>>>> before the copy is done.
>>>>> 3. The copy could take long time for huge files with IO blocked.
>>>>> 4. The copy requires as many free blocks as the source file has.
>>>>> If the source is huge, say it’s 1TiB, it’s hard to require the file
>>>>> system to have another 1TiB free.
>>>>>
>>>>> The use case in concern is that the XFS files are used as images files for
>>>>> Virtual Machines.
>>>>> 1. The image files are huge, they can reach hundreds of GiB and even to TiB.
>>>>> 2. Backups are made via reflink copies, and CoW makes the files badly fragmented.
>>>>> 3. fragmentation make reflink copies super slow.
>>>>> 4. during the reflink copy, all IO requests to the file are blocked for super
>>>>> long time. That makes timeout in VM and the timeout lead to disaster.
>>>>>
>>>>> This feature aims to:
>>>>> 1. reduce the file fragmentation making future reflink (much) faster and
>>>>> 2. at the same time, defragmentation works in non-exclusive manner, it doesn’t
>>>>> block file IOs long.
>>>>>
>>>>> Non-exclusive defragment
>>>>> Here we are introducing the non-exclusive manner to defragment a file,
>>>>> especially for huge files, without blocking IO to it long. Non-exclusive
>>>>> defragmentation divides the whole file into small pieces. For each piece,
>>>>> we lock the file, defragment the piece and unlock the file. Defragmenting
>>>>> the small piece doesn’t take long. File IO requests can get served between
>>>>> pieces before blocked long. Also we put (user adjustable) idle time between
>>>>> defragmenting two consecutive pieces to balance the defragmentation and file IOs.
>>>>> So though the defragmentation could take longer than xfs_fsr, it balances
>>>>> defragmentation and file IOs.
>>>>
>>>> I'm kinda surprised you don't just turn on alwayscow mode, use an
>>>> iomap_funshare-like function to read in and dirty pagecache (which will
>>>> hopefully create a new large cow fork mapping) and then flush it all
>>>> back out with writeback. Then you don't need all this state tracking,
>>>> kthreads management, and copying file data through the buffer cache.
>>>> Wouldn't that be a lot simpler?
>>>
>>> Hmmm. I don't think it needs any kernel code to be written at all.
>>> I think we can do atomic section-by-section, crash-safe active file
>>> defrag from userspace like this:
>>>
>>> scratch_fd = open(O_TMPFILE);
>>> defrag_fd = open("file-to-be-dfragged");
>>>
>>> while (offset < target_size) {
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * share a range of the file to be defragged into
>>> * the scratch file.
>>> */
>>> args.src_fd = defrag_fd;
>>> args.src_offset = offset;
>>> args.src_len = length;
>>> args.dst_offset = offset;
>>> ioctl(scratch_fd, FICLONERANGE, args);
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * For the shared range to be unshared via a
>>> * copy-on-write operation in the file to be
>>> * defragged. This causes the file needing to be
>>> * defragged to have new extents allocated and the
>>> * data to be copied over and written out.
>>> */
>>> fallocate(defrag_fd, FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE, offset, length);
>>> fdatasync(defrag_fd);
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * Punch out the original extents we shared to the
>>> * scratch file so they are returned to free space.
>>> */
>>> fallocate(scratch_fd, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH, offset, length);
>
> You could even set args.dst_offset = 0 and ftruncate here.
>
> But yes, this is a better suggestion than adding more kernel code.
>
>>> /* move onto next region */
>>> offset += length;
>>> };
>>>
>>> As long as the length is large enough for the unshare to create a
>>> large contiguous delalloc region for the COW, I think this would
>>> likely acheive the desired "non-exclusive" defrag requirement.
>>>
>>> If we were to implement this as, say, and xfs_spaceman operation
>>> then all the user controlled policy bits (like inter chunk delays,
>>> chunk sizes, etc) then just becomes command line parameters for the
>>> defrag command...
>>
>>
>> Ha, the idea from user space is very interesting!
>> So far I have the following thoughts:
>> 1). If the FICLONERANGE/FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE/FALLOC_FL_PUNCH works
>> on a FS without reflink enabled.
>
> It does not.
>
> That said, for your usecase (reflinked vm disk images that fragment over
> time) that won't be an issue. For non-reflink filesystems, there's
> fewer chances for extreme fragmentation due to the lack of COW.
>
>> 2). What if there is a big hole in the file to be defragmented? Will
>> it cause block allocation and writing blocks with zeroes.
>
> FUNSHARE ignores holes.
>
>> 3). In case a big range of the file is good (not much fragmented), the
>> ‘defrag’ on that range is not necessary.
>
> Yep, so you'd have to check the bmap/fiemap output first to identify
> areas that are more fragmented than you'd like.
>
>> 4). The use space defrag can’t use a try-lock mode to make IO requests
>> have priorities. I am not sure if this is very important.
>>
>> Maybe we can work with xfs_bmap to get extents info and skip good
>> extents and holes to help case 2) and 3).
>
> Yeah, that sounds necessary.
>
Thanks for answering!
Wengang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-15 17:07 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 17:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
@ 2023-12-15 20:20 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-18 16:27 ` Wengang Wang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2023-12-15 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Wengang Wang; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 05:07:36PM +0000, Wengang Wang wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 2023, at 7:15 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
> > If we were to implement this as, say, and xfs_spaceman operation
> > then all the user controlled policy bits (like inter chunk delays,
> > chunk sizes, etc) then just becomes command line parameters for the
> > defrag command...
>
>
> Ha, the idea from user space is very interesting!
> So far I have the following thoughts:
> 1). If the FICLONERANGE/FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE/FALLOC_FL_PUNCH works on a FS without reflink
> enabled.
Personally, I don't care if reflink is not enabled. It's the default
for new filesystems, and it's cost free for anyone who is not
using reflink so there is no reason for anyone to turn it off.
What I'm saying is "don't compromise the design of the functionality
required just because someone might choose to disable that
functionality".
> 2). What if there is a big hole in the file to be defragmented? Will it cause block allocation and writing blocks with
> zeroes.
Unshare skips holes.
> 3). In case a big range of the file is good (not much fragmented), the ‘defrag’ on that range is not necessary.
xfs_fsr already deals with this - it uses XFS_IOC_GETBMAPX to scan
the extent list to determine what to defrag, to replicate unwritten
regions and to skip holes. Having to scan the extent list is kinda
expected for a defrag utility
> 4). The use space defrag can’t use a try-lock mode to make IO requests have priorities. I am not sure if this is very important.
As long as the individual operations aren't holding locks for a long
time, I doubt it matters. And you can use ionice to make sure the IO
being issued has background priority in the block scheduler...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-15 20:20 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2023-12-18 16:27 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-19 21:17 ` Wengang Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-18 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
> On Dec 15, 2023, at 12:20 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 05:07:36PM +0000, Wengang Wang wrote:
>>> On Dec 14, 2023, at 7:15 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>>> If we were to implement this as, say, and xfs_spaceman operation
>>> then all the user controlled policy bits (like inter chunk delays,
>>> chunk sizes, etc) then just becomes command line parameters for the
>>> defrag command...
>>
>>
>> Ha, the idea from user space is very interesting!
>> So far I have the following thoughts:
>> 1). If the FICLONERANGE/FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE/FALLOC_FL_PUNCH works on a FS without reflink
>> enabled.
>
> Personally, I don't care if reflink is not enabled. It's the default
> for new filesystems, and it's cost free for anyone who is not
> using reflink so there is no reason for anyone to turn it off.
>
> What I'm saying is "don't compromise the design of the functionality
> required just because someone might choose to disable that
> functionality".
>
>> 2). What if there is a big hole in the file to be defragmented? Will it cause block allocation and writing blocks with
>> zeroes.
>
> Unshare skips holes.
>
>> 3). In case a big range of the file is good (not much fragmented), the ‘defrag’ on that range is not necessary.
>
> xfs_fsr already deals with this - it uses XFS_IOC_GETBMAPX to scan
> the extent list to determine what to defrag, to replicate unwritten
> regions and to skip holes. Having to scan the extent list is kinda
> expected for a defrag utility
>
>> 4). The use space defrag can’t use a try-lock mode to make IO requests have priorities. I am not sure if this is very important.
>
> As long as the individual operations aren't holding locks for a long
> time, I doubt it matters. And you can use ionice to make sure the IO
> being issued has background priority in the block scheduler...
>
Yes, thanks for the answers.
I will try it out.
Thanks,
Wengang
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-18 16:27 ` Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-19 21:17 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-19 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-19 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Hi Dave,
Yes, the user space defrag works and satisfies my requirement (almost no change from your example code).
Let me know if you want it in xfsprog.
Thanks,
Wengang
> On Dec 18, 2023, at 8:27 AM, Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Dec 15, 2023, at 12:20 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 05:07:36PM +0000, Wengang Wang wrote:
>>>> On Dec 14, 2023, at 7:15 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>>>> If we were to implement this as, say, and xfs_spaceman operation
>>>> then all the user controlled policy bits (like inter chunk delays,
>>>> chunk sizes, etc) then just becomes command line parameters for the
>>>> defrag command...
>>>
>>>
>>> Ha, the idea from user space is very interesting!
>>> So far I have the following thoughts:
>>> 1). If the FICLONERANGE/FALLOC_FL_UNSHARE_RANGE/FALLOC_FL_PUNCH works on a FS without reflink
>>> enabled.
>>
>> Personally, I don't care if reflink is not enabled. It's the default
>> for new filesystems, and it's cost free for anyone who is not
>> using reflink so there is no reason for anyone to turn it off.
>>
>> What I'm saying is "don't compromise the design of the functionality
>> required just because someone might choose to disable that
>> functionality".
>>
>>> 2). What if there is a big hole in the file to be defragmented? Will it cause block allocation and writing blocks with
>>> zeroes.
>>
>> Unshare skips holes.
>>
>>> 3). In case a big range of the file is good (not much fragmented), the ‘defrag’ on that range is not necessary.
>>
>> xfs_fsr already deals with this - it uses XFS_IOC_GETBMAPX to scan
>> the extent list to determine what to defrag, to replicate unwritten
>> regions and to skip holes. Having to scan the extent list is kinda
>> expected for a defrag utility
>>
>>> 4). The use space defrag can’t use a try-lock mode to make IO requests have priorities. I am not sure if this is very important.
>>
>> As long as the individual operations aren't holding locks for a long
>> time, I doubt it matters. And you can use ionice to make sure the IO
>> being issued has background priority in the block scheduler...
>>
>
> Yes, thanks for the answers.
> I will try it out.
>
> Thanks,
> Wengang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-19 21:17 ` Wengang Wang
@ 2023-12-19 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-19 22:23 ` Wengang Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2023-12-19 21:29 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Wengang Wang; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 09:17:31PM +0000, Wengang Wang wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> Yes, the user space defrag works and satisfies my requirement (almost no change from your example code).
That's good to know :)
> Let me know if you want it in xfsprog.
Yes, i think adding it as an xfs_spaceman command would be a good
way for this defrag feature to be maintained for anyone who has need
for it.
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment
2023-12-19 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
@ 2023-12-19 22:23 ` Wengang Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Wengang Wang @ 2023-12-19 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: Darrick J. Wong, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
> On Dec 19, 2023, at 1:29 PM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 09:17:31PM +0000, Wengang Wang wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>> Yes, the user space defrag works and satisfies my requirement (almost no change from your example code).
>
> That's good to know :)
>
>> Let me know if you want it in xfsprog.
>
> Yes, i think adding it as an xfs_spaceman command would be a good
> way for this defrag feature to be maintained for anyone who has need
> for it.
>
Got it. Will try it.
Thanks,
Wengang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-19 22:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-12-14 17:05 [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: defrag: introduce strucutures and numbers Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 5:35 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: defrag: initialization and cleanup Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 14:09 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: defrag implement stop/suspend/resume/status Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: defrag: allocate/cleanup defragmentation Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: defrag: process some cases in xfs_defrag_process Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: defrag: piece picking up Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: defrag: guarantee contigurous blocks in cow fork Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: defrag: copy data from old blocks to new blocks Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 17:05 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: defrag: map " Wengang Wang
2023-12-14 21:35 ` [PATCH 0/9] xfs file non-exclusive online defragment Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-15 3:15 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-15 17:07 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 17:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-12-15 20:03 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 20:20 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-18 16:27 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-19 21:17 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-19 21:29 ` Dave Chinner
2023-12-19 22:23 ` Wengang Wang
2023-12-15 4:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-15 16:48 ` Wengang Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).